Sunday, January 22, 2012

Race, Gingrich, and South Carolina

I love living in the south--the mild winters, the summer heat, magnolia trees with those impossibly large white blooms nestled among glossy green leaves. I like iced tea, collard greens, and watermelon. I can make a sweet potato pie that will make you forget that there is such a thing as a pumpkin. I'm southern to the core and while I love my southern heritage, I also know that it includes a dark side, a little problem that has to do with race.

Please don't misunderstand, I know that race is not an issue only in the South. I've seen enough manifestations of racial prejudice in my lifetime to be certain that it is not limited by geography. The South just has a peculiar love/hate affair with its perceptions about race. The white guy with a confederate flag on his bumper and who would disown any child of his that dated outside of his race will stop to help a lone black woman standing by the road next to her broken down car.

This dichotomy of feelings about race is what fuels someone like Newt Gingrich, what allows him to make a statement such as the following with a sincere belief that it does not reflect racial stereotyping and should not be construed as offensive or racist.
I'm prepared, if the NAACP invites me, I'll go to their convention and talk about why the African American community should demand paychecks and not be satisfied with food stamps. (Gingrich Singles Out Blacks)
Gingrich conveniently ignores that  28% of American households receiving food stamps are black and 59% are white. About 78% of American households are white and about 13% are black. (U.S. Census Bureau)

NAACP President and CEO Ben Jealous points out, the majority of people receiving food stamps are not African-Americans and have jobs. (Gingrich Singles Out Blacks) Gingrich is fond of referring to Obama as the food stamp president. (Id.) More people are receiving food stamps under this administration. Of course more people are unemployed or under employed. The country is, after all, in a recession.

However, in spite of all my discussion of Newt and food stamps, my point isn't really about Gingrich's dissemination of misleading and down right false information. I'm more interested in Newt's win in South Carolina. 

This ability to hold on to racist ideology and simultaneously and sincerely believe that you are not acting in a racist manner is at the core of South Carolina's enthusiasm for Newt Gingrich. Gingrich responded with indignation when moderator Juan Williams dared inquire at the GOP presidential candidates debate in South Carolina:
Speaker Gingrich, you recently said black Americans should demand jobs, not food stamps. You also said poor kids lack a strong work ethic and proposed having them work as janitors in their schools. Can't you see that this is viewed, at a minimum, as insulting to all Americans, but particularly to black Americans?
Gingrich's response was swift and direct, "No. I don't see that." The audience in the debate hall also responded, standing and applauding Gingrich's snippy response.

Huffington Post reporter Jon Ward sums it up succinctly: 
From the moment that Gingrich slapped down Williams' questions about his attitude toward low-income blacks and thousands in the debate hall stood and roared their approval--several voters this week told The Huffington Post that Gingrich "put him in his place"--Gingrich was on fire. (Gingrich Wins Big in SC)
Newt Gingrich speaks southern, and he is particularly fluent in the dialect of white southerners. It sounds the same as regular southern on the surface but it includes all sorts of code words and phrases. Neighborhood schools is a euphemism for maintaining segregation. Putting paychecks in the hands of black people is code for, those people don't want to work and live to receive government handouts. Put him in his place is used to speak of putting down an uppity Negro who has forgotten his place. Juan Williams at the debate and President Obama in general, as he is the most uppity Negro of all time. Angry black woman refers to any black female who articulates her opinions and doesn't shy away from controversy. Example: First Lady Michelle Obama. (I'm proud to say that I have also been designated on more than one occasion as an angry black woman.)

Newt knows how to make southern whites who refuse to confront their own issues with race feel good about themselves. A discussion about race and racism is immediately ended when the focus becomes on declaring that one is not a racist, although no one has declared anyone to be a racist. Talking about racism is not the same as calling someone a racist. The discussion that needs to be done about lingering racist beliefs, attitudes,and practices rarely takes place in this country which is why Newt really doesn't get why there is anything wrong with declaring that black people need to seek paychecks instead of food stamps. The key word is seek,which assumes that black people are more likely to be low-wealth in America because we choose to be so.

Gingrich believes that he has the vision to lead low-wealth black folks to the promised land. All he has to do is show us the light so that we understand that we need to work and not just sit around waiting for government handouts. Newt, and his eager supporters in South Carolina function on the presumption that it is lack of effort and inherent laziness on the part of black people that makes for a disproportional number of African-Americans living at or below the poverty level in the U.S.  Lack of opportunities, systemic and institutional racial exclusion, and a continued fostering of racial stereotypes have nothing to do with it. 

The reality is that the concept of racial equality is relatively new. Following emancipation in 1865 was a hundred years of Jim Crow, discrimination,restriction, and persecution based on the color of your skin. I grew up in a society in which where I could go and what I could do was determined by my skin color. I had to learn as a child not to display anything that could be construed as attitude or impudence to any white person regardless as to what that white person may have done or said to me.  I was denied access to schools, restaurants, hospitals, swimming pools, wherever there was a sign that designated "white only." Although there are days when I feel ancient, I'm only 56.

It remains to be seen if Newt Gingrich's bilingual abilities will make him the GOP presidential nominee. His substantial victory in South Carolina, 40.4% to Romney's 27.9%, may not translate well to other parts of the nation which are not as adept at self deception when it comes to matters of race. 

There are those who insist that the intense anti-Obama sentiment expressed by some has nothing to do with his being a black man. He is, by every definition that this country proposes about determining one's race a black man.  So when someone says to me, what's race got to do with it, my answer is "everything."

17 comments:

  1. A thought provoking post, much of which I agree with.

    What is difficult to understand (at least for me) is why race has anything to do with anything. Every man and women should be judged by their actions, both good and not so good. And, as any thinking person can see, there is both good (honorable) and not so good (dishonorable) individuals in every race.

    Positive change and understanding has been too slow with respect to race relations. It should be everyone's hope that they improve exponentially as people shed their prejudices and fears of those of different color or ethnicity.

    It is my belief that years into the future the human race may very well be shades of the same color. It is as it should be.

    During a discussion of race relations with my father many years ago I asked him what his feelings would be should his daughter(s), and my sister(s), ever date and then choose to marry a black man. His response was, I don't know. While he honestly believed he was not prejudiced in any way I simply told him until such time as he could welcome a black man (or women)into his family as a son or daughter in law he was harboring a degree of prejudice.

    There is a long way yet to travel before we finally get to where we should be. With frank and open discussion from you, and the many people like you Sheria we will arrive.

    Thank you for this post.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sheria,

    An excellent post. One way of coming at a definition of "ideology" is to say that it's what allows people to do deplorable things without thinking they're doing anything wrong -- Conquistadors killing people in the New World to "save their souls for Christ," etc.

    But as your post suggests, that definition doesn't quite close the matter -- on one hand, Newt Gingrich probably doesn't think he's a racist, and believes everything he says and does is for some greater good (he loves to deploy grandiose rhetoric when he's not busy savaging someone). On the other hand, it's clear, as you say, that like many savvy southern pols, he speaks in code that his audience evidently delights in processing in its own way. And that doesn't seem like something one can do without some level of awareness -- probably a very high level. Frankly, I thought what Gingrich did to Juan Williams (to the obvious glee of the usual howling mob of an audience) was the equivalent of calling a black man "boy." Nothing brought that home like the remark from some woman a day or so after the debate thanking Gingrich for -- close paraphrase -- "putting Juan Williams in his place." Uh-huh -- I think we all know what THAT means. The former Speaker's reference to Barack Obama as a "food stamp president" was one of the most viciously false and racist things I've heard in a good while. I find it a measure of the Right's utter disrespect for Mr. Obama that they reckon they can just plain make shit up about him without the slightest embarrassment or fear of exposure.

    I don't know see how Gingrich could possibly play well outside the Deep South. He comes across as mean, and national audiences aren't kind to such candidates. And for all his vaunting about his intellectual abilities and the usual lying racist tripe about "teleprompters," I think we can be reasonably certain that Barack Obama will clean his clock in any debate, three hours long or otherwise. Gingrich is exactly what someone once called him: a stupid person's model of what an intellectual would sound like.

    The GOP Establishment are no doubt in consternation and are determined to cut him off at the knees before he knocks Romney out of the race. Tonight's 12-point loss was significant and embarrassing for Romney, and the "tax thing" is making him look like a man with something to hide. Why didn't his team get together on that one about six months or a year back since, after all, his tax returns probably look like the plans for Apollo 11? It makes no sense.

    Finally, nothing disgusts me quite so much as the alleged "Christians" who find it so easy to forgive and even forget Gingrich's abominable behavior towards others -- apparently, these primitive bastards think it's okay to do anything you like so long as you mumble something about your renewed personal relationship with Jesus Christ afterwards and go right on being as nasty as you wanna be. It seems to me that this man is so transformed and filled with the Holy Spirit that he has no problem dog-whistling the most racist elements in the Republican Party to serve his cause, no problem calling our president a "food stamp president"? How does THAT show evidence of moral reformation? Santa Maria, Madre de Dios! What a heap of sanctimonious bunkum!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Brava Sheria -- that deserves a standing ovation. I love living in the South too, but it's like a beautiful old house with something very, very nasty down in the basement.

    Dino,

    Torquemada thought he was acting for the greater good and I'm sure he slept well at night. That's the power of reducing things to the abstract and arguing about "principle" which is simply a form of creating the enemy you shadow box with.

    I have to wonder if the BJ candidate's ability to triumph over straw Obamas and windmill Democrats will wither if somehow he's forced to face the real one, but it's possible he will keep on cutting paper dolls out of brown paper and doing horrible things to them and that it will be enough for these debased, atavistic and savage protohominids who still think their accursed war against the United States was all about "freedom."

    A little bit of religion is a dangerous thing and for the rabble who call themselves the Religious Right, it's only a way to gift wrap the ugliest, meanest things about the ugliest and meanest people. These aren't people who think God is good and want to align themselves with goodness, much less devote themselves to justice and mercy even if it involves people from outside their congregations. We will never have any worthwhile future until such people are confined in cages, but here we have the media treating them like serious contenders.

    God Damn the Republicans. Damn them each and every one and especially those who would knowingly support the devil just to get Obama out of the way and although it would be beneath me to dream of seeing these evil, greedy, lying men beaten to a pulp, tarred, feathered and dragged out of town behind a rusted-out 1972 Ford pickup belching blue smoke from worn-out piston rings -- yet still Die Gedanken sind Frei as the old song goes, and what dreams may come, will come.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Capt. Fogg,

    Damn 'em high! I only refrain from invoking the Curse of Ernulphus out of good manners. And yes, I figure Torquemada always got at least eight hours in. At least! Tormenting people over their religious "heresies" is exhausting.

    I think Obama wouldn't have much trouble with the Gingrinch -- the difference is that the former is a genuine scholar, while the latter writes teragigazillions of books, which to me sort of means that he thinks every so-called thought that flits through his mind even before his first cup of coffee in the morning needs to be published and read by the eager right-wing masses. Is there anything someone placed as he is could write that WOULDN'T get published? I think not. Obama would reduce him to what he is, which I'll leave decorously unsaid.

    RN,

    The race issue – yes, that’s a good question. I’m guessing that at base it’s some kind of eeee-volushunary reaction, a primitive way of separating one tribe from another and deciding they’re the enemy to shore up one’s own group and scarce resources against outsiders. It would therefore be derived from lack, from an impoverished sense of possibilities. Humans! We dinos are so much more open-minded. I, for instance (an allosaurus), don’t hate the stegosaurus because’s he’s olive rather than khaki. No, I hate him because HE’S DELICIOUS! Stegosaurus delendus est!

    My understanding is that so-called justifications for racial discrimination in the West are fairly recent. The Greeks were equal-opportunity snotty about anyone who wasn’t Greek. Not a Greek? Then you’re one of the barbaroi: bar-bar, bar-bar, bar-bar! I think we’re going to have to raid your village. It wasn’t until slavery came under attack in the American South that the slavemasters started talking so much race-rubbish, supposedly based on the Bible and on C19 science. They needed to feel that what they were doing was right with God and with the latest notions about racial differences.

    I would suggest that in the modern context, certain white folk look down on black folk because, being the low-status and low- self-esteem bunch that they are, they need somebody to look down on and “put in his or her place,” and America’s long and savage history of racial discrimination makes that possible.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sheria - as usual you have put up such a complete, cohesive post there isn't much to add. The commenters are so good, I can just sit here being lazy, but then I'd feel guilty for not at least letting you know I'm here reading.
    And yes, I think this election will have everything to do with race because whether Gingrich or any of the others consider themselves racist or not, the underlying current is not just get the Dems out of the White House but get the black man out of the White House.
    And most of these people will tell you they are not prejudice but, I cannot tell you how many times I've heard some racially charged stereotyping comment that was prefaced with,"You know, it's a fact..." then fill in the "fact" - most blacks are on welfare, all blacks can sing and dance, most murders are committed by blacks and on it goes.
    Yep, it's going to be about race for a long time because as Sheria reminds us racial equality is still a fairly new concept for many.
    It's up to those of us enlightened individuals to keep fighting back against these carefully couched "facts" with hard evidence of how wrong they are and not allow them a free pass on anything.
    We can change the world but it will take hard work and dedication of generations to do it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I really have nothing to add. Your comments are all so on target. Here, at the Zone, I am always comfortable writing about race because I feel that my words will be fairly weighed and understood.

    I also have some hope. I think that Dino is absolutely correct, we can change the world with hard work and dedication of generations to do it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I can make a sweet potato pie that will make you forget that there is such a thing as a pumpkin.

    If Aunt Clara was still alive, she would say that sounds an awful lot like a challenge. Herewith, the essential recipe for Tulsa-style pumpkin pie. It's really a custard and can be baked without any crust.

    One can of pumpkin. 2 cups of whole milk. 1 1/2 cups of sugar. 5 eggs. 1/2 tsp. salt. 1/2 tsp. vanilla extract. The real secret is the spices. The original recipe just calls for 1/2 tsp. of each.

    My own spice proportions:

    Scant 3/4 tsp. cinnamon
    Scant 3/4 tsp. ground ginger
    Rounded 1/2 tsp. nutmeg
    1/2 tsp. ground cloves

    Use your sense to determine exact amounts. If mixture turns a dark brown, you have added too many spices.

    Bake in pie crust for 50-60 minutes at 425 degrees or until edges begin to pull away and center is nearly solidified. Center will continue to solidify as the pies cool. For crustless custard, subtract five minutes.

    ReplyDelete
  8. a while ago the white druggie you know the one that rhymes with thrush did a segment called million man math it was just another in a long line of racially inclined jokes that helps this worthless radio show limp along, any way at the time I was struck by the fact that race really is a numbers game real math does matter and the underlying demographics for the U.S. are scaring the shit out of these poor white southern crackers as bloggingdino can attest extinction is all to real and the white southern republican is a dinosaur the meteor has already struck their extinction is inevitable unless they can subvert our democracy and almost any cursory examination of the gingrinch shows this to be his MO his only MO besides getting his freak on which hey each to their own (no children please) the gingrinch is as bad as he can be, a god damn caricature, the personification of the most reprehensible portions of a system that is mired in it's own excrement, in other words the perfect republican candidate.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Question now is... Will (can) Newt maintain his surge? Polls already show him with a healthy early lead in Florida amongst republicans.

    I just don't understand why. There are smart aware republicans, aren't there?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Flying Junior, your pumpkin pie sounds delicious! However, in my neck of the woods, we rarely eat pumpkin pie. We grow a lot of sweet potatoes in North Carolina and we have to do something with them!

    My sweet potato pie recipe is a combination of my mother's recipe and a few additions on my part--butterscotch morsels and sweetened condensed milk.

    The following makes one pie although I never make just one. Too many people want a slice and I also give them away at Christmas as gifts. The recipe is easily doubled or tripled.

    1 (1 pound) sweet potato (real potatoes, not canned stuff)
    1/2 cup butter, softened
    1/2 cup white sugar
    1/2 cup light brown sugar
    1/2 cup sweetened condensed milk
    8 oz Nestles butterscotch morsels
    2 eggs lightly beaten
    1/2 teaspoon ground nutmeg
    1 teaspoon ground cinnamon
    1 teaspoon vanilla extract
    1 (9 inch) unbaked pie crust

    Directions

    Boil sweet potatoes whole in skin for 40 to 50 minutes, or until done. Run cold water over the sweet potatoes, and remove the skin.

    Break apart sweet potatoes in a bowl. Add butter, and mix well by hand (a mixer beats out all the texture) Stir in sugar, and butterscotch morsels and mix until morsels have been incorporated with sweet potatoes (the heat from the potatoes should melt the butterscotch morsels into the mix). Add condensed milk, eggs, nutmeg, cinnamon and vanilla. Mix by hand until mixture is well blended.

    Pour filling into an unbaked pie crust.

    Bake at 350 degrees F for 55 to 60 minutes, or until knife inserted in center comes out clean. Pie will puff up like a souffle, and then will sink down as it cools.

    ReplyDelete
  11. P.S. If the sweet potatoes are large, one potato may weigh a pound. If not, add another potato. Sometimes I when mixing filling for multiple pies, I probably use more sweet potato that one pound per pie. I cook by how it looks and I really don't do a lot of precise measuring.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thanks for the recipe Sheria. I'll try it out at a family get-together!

    ReplyDelete
  13. You're welcome, Flying Junior. My nephew has been requesting pumpkin pie during the holidays so Im also going to try out your recipe. I like your increase of the spices and I totally understand what you mean by use your sense when it comes to the spices.

    ReplyDelete
  14. RN,

    "There are smart aware republicans, aren't there?"

    In theory, but in practice loyalty seems to trump decency or even sanity. If Eisenhower and even Reagan would be called 'Far Left Liberals' today, does it really mean anything other than tribalism to be a Republican?

    ReplyDelete
  15. The recipe is for two pies but leaves a little extra to put in a small bowl. It's actually 1/4 teaspoon salt. At least I remembered it. I think I called Mom every November for ten years.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Capt. - It ls sad, but there is truth in your observations. If the republican party had remained the party of Eisenhower, Goldwater, and Reagan I likely would still be a republican. As it stands now I have no party affiliation.

    ReplyDelete
  17. There's nothing conservative about any of this thoroughly reprehensible gang of liars, cheats, hypocrites and thugs. Conservative is, by definition, I think, reasonable. Today's GOP is simply a gang.

    ReplyDelete

We welcome civil discourse from all people but express no obligation to allow contributors and readers to be trolled. Any comment that sinks to the level of bigotry, defamation, personal insults, off-topic rants, and profanity will be deleted without notice.