"this new report is proof positive that known and suspected terrorists are exploiting a major loophole in our law, threatening our families and our communities. This 'terror gap' has been open too long, and our national security demands that we shut it down."says Sen. Frank Lautenberg, (D-NJ.) No one my age can fail to be reminded of Tailgunner Joe McCarthy and his fake list of names. Frank, of course, is also a damn liar.
As might be expected, we're really not talking about "known" terrorists, but about people who have been put on a watch list, but against whom there is no evidence. The Justice Department tells us says CNN, that the FBI had thousands of names on its watch list based on outdated information and should have removed them. The GAO notes properly that being on a terrorist watch list does not mean that someone is involved in any terrorist activity, so as I said, we're not talking about "known terrorists" at all. Neither are we talking about a "loophole" here; we're talking about punishment without due process.
We should all be concerned when there's a proposal to make an accusation, an opinion, a conjecture or a suspicion reason to take away someones constitutional rights, but of course there are those so frightened of coming to harm that they just don't care, which makes them unfit to be participants in a democracy such as ours: a government of laws, not of fear. Sad to say, they're not all Republicans.
Lautenberg refers to a GAO report released yesterday, which reveals that about 90% of people who have sought to buy firearms and who had their names on a "watch list" were allowed to buy them because there was no evidence that they actually were involved in illegal acts. Perhaps they had opinions that were scary, beliefs that troubled the list makers and somehow knew other scary people: perhaps they were falsely accused or, as is often the case, had a name similar to that of a convicted felon. But of course our thoughts are supposed to be free and our associations as well. Should we start putting people who oppose abortion on a terrorism watch list because others with similar beliefs have committed crimes? What about people who have attended "Tea bag" parties? People with an 'unauthorized' religion? Why isn't thought crime abhorrent to us any more?
From his perch in the grandstand, Lautenberg claims to be introducing legislation that would give the U.S. attorney general "authority to stop the sale of guns or explosives to terrorists." That's something the law already addresses and of course it's deceptive since one is not a terrorist without some evidence of illegal activity and indeed without due process to determine guilt or innocence. So what Frank is saying here is that suspicion is guilt and suspicion trumps a fair trial and if you're different or someone doesn't like you, you have no rights. How long have we been fighting monsters that we're starting not to notice what we've become?
Why does this not surprise me? Oh yeah, he is from NJ. I tell ya some of the people here are complete idiots. Of course there are a few exceptions. :-)
ReplyDeleteThis post was excellent and spot on. I'm not sure where this 'differing opinions prevented you from purchasing guns' theory came from but it is ridiculous. One of the most treasured things about America is the fact that we all can have our own opinions and views. When that becomes jeopardized for having the "wrong ones" we lose our country's integrity. There should definitely be limits on buying a gun but having an opinion should not be one of them!
Thank you.
ReplyDeleteWhat I meant is that being a terrorist is much different than some attitude one has toward the US. Joe McCarthy essentially made it illegal even to have considered some economic theory.
I might think this is the worst country in the world, but that's an opinion, not terrorism and opinions should not be illegal in a free country.
I should Mention that CNN.com's non-scientific poll showed that 90% want the government to forbid gun sales to anyone on the admittedly inaccurate FBI list, thus proving that we're too cowardly to insist on due process and we hate freedom too much to care about the difference between rumor and a criminal conviction.
ReplyDeleteVery disturbing. Once again, we have a Democrat afraid to appear weak on national security. So he comes up with some cockamamie scheme that grossly restricts basic rights and, in the long run, makes us less safe. Bravo senator.
ReplyDeleteAs far as the CNN.com poll, I don't think its results prove anything by virtue of the fact that it is not scientific. That poll more likely suggests that the reading comprehension of those who visit CNN.com isn't very high (and given CNN's uncanny ability for dumbing down every piece of information it touches, I can't say this is entirely surprising). It's a disturbing result if it's accurate, but we should be careful not to jump to conclusions.
How about this solution:
ReplyDeleteWe have this grossly bloated and inaccurate "terrorist watch list"- another example of the inept and corrupt attempt of the Bush administration to make a show of protecting us while actually doing nothing. Yet, presumably, some (undoubtedly small) number of those people actually belong on such a list.
Here's one more mess left to Obama by the Republicans. How about if we make an honest attempt to see who belongs on the list and who doesn't, and then consider what to do about their right to purchase guns.