By (O)CT(O)PUS
If ye endure chastening,God dealeth with you as with sons;for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not?But if ye be without chastisement,whereof all are partakers,then are ye bastards and not sons.(Hebrews 12:6-8)
Celebrity gossip and tabloid news have never interested me. After weeks of nonstop Michael Jackson media noise, I made myself a promise to avoid the subject … until this caught my attention:
"How often would he beat you?" Martin asked.This dialogue is from a 2003 interview conducted by Martin Bashir. Here is Michael Jackson revealing a stolen childhood when he was the youngest member of the Jackson Five … beatings by strap and metal cord, rehearsals run like military drills, memories of being locked in closets, of being told by his father that his nose is “fat and ugly.” In short, his was a childhood marked by physical and emotional abuse, fear and humiliation, and ultimately trauma.
"Too much," Michael revealed.
"Would he only use a belt?" Martin asked.
Covering his face, Michael replied, "Why would you do this to me? No, more than a belt."
"I was scared, so scared that I would regurgitate," he added.
"What would produce that sort of reaction in you?" Martin asked.
"His presence, just seeing him," Michael said.
For years, media focused on Wacko Jacko, the Freak. A leering public witnessed his Dorian Gray transformation from child star to grotesque. Tabloid gossip condemned him with rumors and innuendos, maligned him for his flamboyant self-indulgences, and vilified him long after a jury acquitted him of child molestation charges. The real story of Michael Jackson is not about these sensationalized tabloid accounts but about the long-term consequences of child abuse and our celebrity culture that engages in victim blame. Why should we care about the tragedy of Michael Jackson’s life and his inner struggle?
The eminent child psychologist, Alice Miller, has waged a lifelong crusade against “poisonous pedagogy,” an outmoded parenting style aimed at breaking the will of children and turning them into obedient subjects by means of coercion, manipulation, and cruelty.
“Spare the rod and spoil the child” is an example of what Miller calls the burden of inherited wisdom that inflicts strict upbringing upon diabolical offspring for the purpose of forcing submission. Unlike adult survivors of abuse and torture, children do not always recount what has been done to them. Often, they feel shame. Sometimes, their memories contrive to forget their torments or deny or repress them outright. Nevertheless, those memories are preserved inside the victim in excruciating detail … only to emerge later in bizarre, seemingly irrational, or even violent behaviors.
When a cruel upbringing is represented to children as righteous and proper, they will grow into adults who will avenge themselves without qualms by inflicting the same cruel practices on their own children or charges. Society will revere and commend these newly minted authoritarians as upstanding, God-fearing enforcers of the community standard. Thus, sadism is allowed to originate, flourish, and pass from generation to generation under the cover of piety and patriotism and always accomplished with an injunction:
This is for your own good.
In her crusade against cruel childrearing practices, Miller reminds us that it takes time for scientific and social knowledge to gain acceptance, more time to reach those with less schooling or less access to information, and even more time to reach those whose own repressed experiences prevent them from accepting an uncomfortable truth [1].
Seemingly irrational behaviors headlined in tabloids are not irrational when understood as signs and symptoms of abuse and trauma. Why should it surprise us when a “lost child” casts himself as Peter Pan reincarnate, surrounds himself with a Neverland construct of perpetual childhood, and chooses children, no matter how specious and suspect, as peers and playmates - all in an effort to reclaim a stolen childhood!
Why should we be shocked by an addiction to plastic surgery to correct an imagined defect in appearance … and remake the “fat and ugly nose” ridiculed by his father at an age when adolescents are extra sensitive about their physical appearance!
Why should we be surprised by Michael Jackson’s alleged abuse of prescription drugs - craved and consumed in prodigious quantities ostensibly to numb feelings of depression, anxiety, and low self-esteem!
Let us avoid the temptation to characterize Michael Jackson in diagnostic terms, which are best left to qualified and licensed mental health practitioners. The inherent dangers of popularizing psycho-speak is simply this: Diagnostic terms are very often misunderstood by laypersons and misused by others whose purpose may be to engage in character assassination.
Abused children are never victimized once. They are victimized repeatedly when the guardians of conformity and public morality dismiss their signs and symptoms as character flaws and target them for ridicule and scorn, further reducing them to silence. Once compromised, the prodigal child turned adult is an easy target for continued abuse and exploitation, as Chris Hedges explains in this perspective:
Those who created Jackson’s public persona and turned him into a piece of property … are the agents, publicists, marketing people, promoters, script writers, television and movie producers, advertisers, video technicians, photographers, bodyguards, recording executives, wardrobe consultants, fitness trainers, pollsters, public announcers and television news personalities who create the vast stage of celebrity for profit (...) The moral nihilism of our culture licenses a dark voyeurism into other people’s humiliation, pain, weakness and betrayal … which is pretty much the story of Jackson’s life …As Chris Hedges reminds us, a successful celebrity raking in millions of dollars is a money tree to the legions of media vultures in the food chain. Media is a shallow, fast-moving stream intolerant of our need to pause, analyze, and understand the accelerated grimace of a culture turned monstrous.
The issues raised by Alice Miller have social and historical implications. Violence is learned in the home. Obedience is a condition of beatitude. Sometimes abused and traumatized children reenact their childhoods on the political stage and turn themselves into tyrants or become the adherents, adulators, and henchman of tyrants and lunatic ideologues. Systemic child abuse is the wellspring of injustice, ignorance, and evil in the world. When we finally treat our children with the dignity, love, and nurturing they deserve, only then can we dream of a world free of violence and tyranny.
Reference:
[1] Alice Miller (2001). The truth will set you free. NY: Basic Books.
Online Resources:
Child abuse and mistreatment - The Alice Miller Official Website.
For your own good: Hidden cruelty in child-rearing and the roots of violence - This book is available legally online - highly recommended.
The Andrew Vachss Official Website - A lawyer and novelist who writes about child abuse as the root of violence … its cost to individuals and society.
Terrific article! You were firing on all 8 tentacles here.
ReplyDeleteWould the "money vultures" make out so well if the public didn't lust for the mind numbing noise of or self-referential popular culture? Does the entertainment industry exist for any other reason than to make the rabble worship it and make them rich?
Would this man's childhood have been different if the prospect of vast wealth through boisterous banality weren't there for his father to strive for and make him enough money to indulge his warped fantasies and avoid the prosecution we have arranged for people with a vastly smaller drug problem?
Our relationship with celebrities mystifies me and nauseates me and
whether or not I can muster a grudging compassion for the fellow much less quasi-religious worship, the culture that made him remains as loathsome as his juvenile and simpering act. Give me the water board, but please, please don't make me listen to that crap!
Thank you, Captain. This is the first of a series of posts that I had been thinking about for a long time. Where am I going with this?
ReplyDeleteWhy do the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, and Michael Savage upset us so much? Because they offend not just our intellect but something deep within us ... perhaps some humiliation from a bully earlier in our lives. I will try to make the case that "hate radio" is not an expression of free speech but a manifestation of verbal abuse ... learned in childhood and manifest in our culture. It changes the frame of the argument.
We do not tolerate verbal abuse at home, in our workplaces, in our society ... why should we tolerate verbal abuse on the airwaves and in our media?
Help spread the word.
Sounds about right to me -- weak-minded, anxious people generally respond to bullies who exude untroubled self-confidence and who have the capacity to tell them what to think. One thing I've noticed about RL is that his pitch works pretty well because he has the voice for it -- a deep, self-assured, broadcasterly delivery makes even his most wrong-headed remarks sound oracular. If one isn't sharp enough to figure out that the guy is talking foolishness, I suppose he sounds like someone who can lead others to the promised land. I've sometimes been rather surprised that a certain right-wing station's ratings are so much better than, say, MSNBC, but perhaps that's because the high ratings indicate a ceiling of sorts: millions of people who are too scatterbrained to think for themselves and who therefore tune in regularly to get their dollop of certitude. Now, if you already know how to think for yourself, you may have better things to do with your time than listen to someone tell you what you already knew.
ReplyDeleteWell done post, Octo.
ReplyDeleteDuring the media blitz surrounding his death I was very bothered by how many times his father managed to get himself in front of cameras - including interviews - positioning himself as the families grand patriarch. And considering how little of the coverage I watched - I thought it very telling how much of the father I did see.
I have never been a particular fan of MJ's brand of music, though I certainly recognize its impact on the art of pop music - and it is an art form whether we personally care for it or not. And not being a fan I've never made any effort to keep up on the man's personal life. But - having said all of that - even I have always been cognizant of the dark presence/influence of his father behind MJ's eccentric behavior and often controversial lifestyle.
Thanks for so eloquently calling his father to account.
Squid, many thanks for your comment. There is more to this story that I left out (a follow-up article is planned). Consider this well publicized account of Michael Savage ridiculing children with autism, as if this pervasive developmental disability disorder were evidence of permissive parenting:
ReplyDelete“Now, the illness du jour is autism. You know what autism is? I'll tell you what autism is. In 99 percent of the cases, it's a brat who hasn't been told to cut the act out. That's what autism is (…) What do you mean they scream and they're silent? They don't have a father around to tell them, "Don't act like a moron. You'll get nowhere in life. Stop acting like a putz. Straighten up. Act like a man. Don't sit there crying and screaming, idiot.”
What does Michael Savage’s diatribe tell us about him? This biographical account of his childhood offers some insight:
“Benny [father of Michael Savage] had a chip on his shoulder and was always mad at the world, and he was tough on Michael. There was nothing Michael could ever do to please him," recalls Alan Zaitz, who has known the radio talker since the two of them were in Hebrew school together as second-graders (…) Benny Weiner verbally abused his son and didn't hesitate to embarrass him in front of his teenage friends, Zaitz says. "Michael would have on tight black jeans and a boat-necked sweater and his dad would say, 'I don't like the way you're dressed. You look like a fag,' stuff like that," he recalls.”
One wonders whose voice we hear, that of the father or that of that son? The apple does not fall far from the tree, as the saying goes, and it does not require a leap of imagination to recognize the trans-generational passage of anger from Benny Weiner, the father, to the son who would later call himself Michael “Savage.”
The follow-up I have in mind is to discuss this culture of abuse in our public life, the above being a prime example.
Octo, thank you for directing me here. Brilliant post. I think sometimes we need to look beyond what we see, to what we don't. That is so much more telling. I never realized what his childhood was like. It helps you to understand the man.
ReplyDeleteYou know, people go to jail for treating dogs that way.
ReplyDelete