Since 1992, the bottom 90 percent of Americans have seen their incomes rise by 13 percent in 2009 dollars, compared with an increase of 399 percent for the top 400.More tax cuts for the wealthy? Why isn't this called “socialism?”
The annual top 400 report was first made public by the Clinton administration, but the George W. Bush administration shut down access to the report. Its release was resumed a year ago when President Obama took office.
(…)
The top 400 reports understate actual top incomes because of deferral rules. For example, managers of offshore hedge funds who deferred their gains may not be counted in the top 400 reports, which are based on the figure on the last line of the front page of Form 1040.
At least three hedge fund managers made $3 billion in 2007. It is not known how much, if any, of their income they deferred.
(…)
The biggest source of income was capital gains, which are taxed at a maximum rate of 15 percent. Gains accounted for 66.3 percent of 2007 income for the top 400, up from 62.8 percent in 2006 and 36.1 percent in 1992.
(…)
The report shows that the number of the top 400 who paid an effective tax rate of 0 percent to 10 percent declined slightly, to 25 in 2007 from 31 in 2006. In 1992 only 6 of the top 400 paid an effective income tax rate of less than 10 percent.
Another 127 paid 10 percent to 15 percent in 2007, up from 113 in 2006.
Only 33 of the top 400 paid an effective tax rate of 30 percent to 35 percent, which is the maximum federal tax rate.
Thursday, February 18, 2010
THE RICH GET RICHER …
This article by David Cay Johnston, Tax Rates for Top 400 Earners Fall as Income Soars, is a damning indictment of economic inequities caused by Bush era tax cuts:
Thank you for your work on this topic....It's great to have this kind of info at our fingertips. The more we can focus a spotlight on this the better.
ReplyDeleteHmm, redistribution of wealth....
ReplyDeleteOf course when a conservative creates it it is capitalism and nothing is said about the fact that everytime a nation faces an extended period of extreme income concentration the economy always goes into a depression.
...oh, and lets not forget all the jobs these folks created....
But ... but ... but ... the conservatives always said if the rich paid less tax that fairy dust would trickle down on us all and we'd ALL be richer! Yet, unemployment is 10%, the middle class is vanishing, bankruptcies were at record levels.
ReplyDeleteConservative economics FAIL...
why do people like us get the hypocrisy, but not our trusted leaders? Trickle down, it's a joke, it's the reason never to give the rethugs power, ever...
ReplyDeleteOcto, I'm reading your post and thinking about the man who crashed his(?) plane into the IRS building in Austin this morning.
ReplyDeleteI first heard about it on NPR, where it was mentioned that the man left a "rambling and incoherent" suicide letter on his website (FBI has since taken it down).
I found the text of the letter here. See for yourself, but I don't find it incoherent -- on the contrary.
Elizabeth, I took a look at the link and found this:
ReplyDelete"I saw it written once that the definition of insanity is repeating the same process over and over and expecting the outcome to suddenly be different. I am finally ready to stop this insanity ...
The communist creed: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.
The capitalist creed: From each according to his gullibility, to each according to his greed.
Joe Stack (1956-2010)"
I find his last words to be desperate but, as you say, by no means incoherent. Very sad!
President Obama, Bernanke, and Jim Cramer are in a MOVIE about hedge funds called "Stock Shock." Even though the movie mostly focuses on Sirius XM stock being naked-short-sold to near bankruptcy (5 cents/share), I liked it because it exposes the dark side of Wall Street and reveals some of their secrets. DVD is everywhere but cheaper at www.stockshockmovie.com
ReplyDelete