Tiger Woods named his Yacht "Privacy." It's obvious why he was seeking it, but we assume incorrectly that we have any right to privacy in these days of The Patriot Act and the mass marketing of fear.
Monitoring our phone calls, reading our e-mails -- that's old hat. Forcing us to produce birth certificates and citizenship papers for any cop who decides your car is weaving even if you're ancestors have lived in Arizona for 15,000 years -- coming soon to a Confederate State near you.
But wait, there's more.
Law Enforcement agencies are now adding vans equipped with side scan x-ray units that can inspect the contents of your car as well as the contents of your jockey shorts if you're walking down the sidewalk. Probable cause, my ass -- and yours.
Government agents can sneak onto your property in the middle of the night, put a GPS device on the bottom of your car and keep track of everywhere you go according to Time Magazine. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals -- the one Fox insists is so Liberaliberaliberal tells us we don't have a right to privacy if our cars are parked in our driveways. Search warrant? Don't make me laugh; they don't have to show you no stinking search warrant, at least not in the nine Western states under its jurisdiction, not to install the device or to use it to see who you visit or even how fast you drive . We have no reasonable expectation that the government isn't tracking our movements even if we pay cash at the gas station and at toll booths and don't use a cell phone. We're fools if we do.
Sound like a Libertarian, don't I? I'm not and I'm not because I am not blaming this on a straw man government, I'm blaming it on you. I'm blaming it on us. We voted for the people who are doing this, we supported the Patriot act, we wallow in the fear mongering the retailing of idiot rage that "justified" it. We fall for their distractions, their distortions and we bark and growl like Pavlov's dogs. When they push our buttons, we push their buttons on the voting machines.
Sure, the Ninth Circuit is Liberaliberaliberal, when they insist you can't use your religious beliefs to stop people from marrying, but they're not are they? They're not when they argue that your home is their castle as is your car, your mailbox and your telephone, and by pretending we're Conservative we vote for the people who appoint them to take our freedom and make us thank them for their trouble.
Captain, its better in the Bahamas. When does the boat leave?
ReplyDeleteBig Brother's keeper... So, what's the keeper's motivation? Who benefits from restricting or removing rights and freedoms?
ReplyDeleteOf course it has to do with power and money. One reason this blog exists, I suspect, is the realization that something has been going very wrong for the last 30 years. An elite class has firmly taken control of America, and is working hard to maintain and protect that control (and has been working that agenda since Roosevelt, who was seen as a class traitor).
Either one is in the elite club, or one is not. Left and right don't matter. Obama, who appeared to be on the left, is a very well connected centrist. It all gets very confusing—until one looks at the lines of control and succession.
Police security is a symptom of the political disease, as is control of the economy.
You may want to check this out...
http://www.therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=5518
That's an interesting site - thanks.
ReplyDeleteOf course the Right was calling for austerity during the Great Depression and right from the start. I'm not an economist, but I've slept in s lot of Holiday Inns and I think the Depression would have ended earlier if they had been deported.
I'm serious about the Bahamas.