1) We can date the demise of Wall Street as an integral part of the American economy to a 1981 decision made by one man, once known as The King Of Wall Street, John Gutfreund.
I didn't know that. I didn't realize that, according to Michael Lewis in The Big Short, on the day Gutfreund took Salomon Brothers from a private partnership to Wall Street's first publicly traded corporation, Salomon Brothers stopped serving investors and started serving themselves. Of Gutfreund and the subsequent remake of The Street, Lewis writes,
He lifted a giant middle finger in the direction of the moral disapproval of his fellow Wall Street CEO's. And he'd seized the day. He and the other partners not only made a quick killing; they transferred the ultimate financial risk from themselves to their shareholders.
...from that moment, the Wall Street firm became a black box. The shareholders who financed the risk taking had no real understanding of what the risk takers were doing, and, as the risk taking grew ever more complex, their understanding diminished....The customers became, oddly, beside the point.
The moment Salomon Brothers demonstrated the potential gains to be had from turning an investment bank into a public corporation and leveraging its balance sheet with exotic risks, the psychological foundations of Wall Street shifted, from trust to blind faith.From there on out, it was all about the CEO's, for whom short-term gain so far outweighed the value of long-term loss that a culture of growing bonuses each year was fostered even when the customers and the stockholders lost money. Even when the government bailed them out of bankruptcy! Without that one little piece, the private-to-public piece, none of it hung together for me.
2) On October 6th, the SCOTUS is scheduled to hear the case of Snyder vs. Phelps, perhaps better known as the case of a grieving father's right to a private funeral for his military son vs. Westboro Baptist Church's right to picket that funeral with signs saying, "Thank God For Dead Soldiers."
I tackled this subject in the spring in "You! What Planet Is This?" and The Wedding Bends. The synopsis is that 20 year old Marine Matthew Snyder died in March, '06, and Fred Phelps' church group picketed his funeral. Matthew's father Albert sued Phelps and his church in '07 for willfully causing emotional distress and invading his privacy. A jury awarded Snyder approximately $11 million, but, in 2009, the US Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit in Richmond, VA, overturned the verdict and ordered Snyder to pay over $16,500 to Phelps for court costs. Snyder refused to pay.
The 1988 case of Hustler Magazine v. Jerry Falwell, " in which the U.S. Supreme Court's unanimous 8-0 decision held the First Amendment's free-speech guarantee prohibits awarding damages to public figures to compensate for emotional distress intentionally inflicted upon them," is cited as precedent. Phelps' daughter, Margie, will represent the family and the church. For Military.com, Craig Trebilcock, one of Snyder's attorneys, was interviewed by Andrew Lubin:
"People want to make this out as free speech," Trebilcock said Monday, "but actually it's about harassment and who is or is not a public figure." He continued "Lance Corporal Snyder was a 20 year-old Marine from Maryland who died in Iraq; how does a church group from Kansas declare him a ‘public figure? Because they're claiming that since the Snyder family ran an obituary in the local newspaper that makes him fair game.This is a verdict to watch for in October. And, if you ever doubted that it is the exception that proves the rule, here's a chance to watch the exception create the precedent for decades to come. Who ever, in their wildest and most horrible nightmares, could have dreamed up Fred Phelps? If this becomes a First Amendment ruling, then we are powerless in the face of insane and aggressive hatefulness. And there's plenty of that to go around these days. Fred Phelps is not the only demon capable of hiring or siring an attorney.
3) Something good--quick and quickly! There IS a place to listen to both sides in an entirely rational debate format.
Go to Intelligence Squared, where you can watch, download podcasts, and even buy tickets. Foremost authorities gather for classic debates of the most important issues we face. Their motto: Think Twice. This is exactly what I've been looking for.
In the most recent debate, the topic was, "Treat terrorists like enemy combatants, not criminals; for and against." The audience is polled prior to the debate and the outcome charted; after the debate, a re-polling shows the winner. I was naturally gratified to find that the audience agreed with me and with my own previously held position. (I'm so easily naturally gratified, in my opinion it just can't happen too frequently. Ahem.)
Outcome, Sept. 14, 2010 |
There's a Research In Depth link that provides titles, snippets, and articles used by each side in developing positions. I may disappear into this site, never to be seen again.
Who in the world knew?!
Nance, thank you for the info on Gutfreund and the Salomon connection. My personal take on the situation, there has always been a culture of greed and corruption on Wall Street, and there is not one villain but many.
ReplyDeleteConsider the insider trading scandal that brought down Ivan Boesky; the SEC investigation that landed junk bond trader Michael Milken in prison; the deregulation of the S&L industry that resulted in a massive government bailout during the Reagan/Bush years; and the role of Joseph Cassano in the 2008 global financial meltdown. This is no coincidence: Cassano worked at Drexel Burnham Lambert during the junk bond years until he was hired by AIG to head the credit default swaps division, literally the ‘ground zero’ of the latest crisis.
In all cases, the villains shared a common mindset: All regarded SEC laws, rules, and regulations with contempt … believing these hindered the free flow of trade. This is the same refrain we hear these days from the GOP and their corporate clients.
Greed and corruption is pandemic: After every financial crisis, the crooks and scoundrels keep getting recycled back into system … and rehired to pull off the same sleazy stunts that got us into trouble in the first place.
More than new rules and regulations, what I would also like to see is a licensing system that qualifies people for Wall Street jobs (i.e., an exam that tests their regulatory knowledge and a license that can be revoked in order to keep these sleaze bags off the Street forever. Try getting Congress to pass this bill. Meanwhile, the sleaze bags cling tenaciously to their right to steal with impunity.
I saw an article yesterday about the new Wall Street movie, the sequel to the 1987 original. Apparently, a lot of people who saw "Wall Street" in the late '80s thought to themselves "Cool, look at all the money I can make. That's my new career!"
ReplyDeleteThe complete opposite of the message Oliver Stone was trying to get out.
Amazing info ... I did not know about Intelligence Squared, I will definitely check it out.
ReplyDeleteI vote for making "News To Me" a regular feature!
SoBe, yes, i agree. I like the idea of a regular News To Me column. It is a quick thumbnail way to share information without time consuming formalities.
ReplyDeleteNance, the Intelligence Squared link is a gem. It brings me back to a problem I have been wrestling with for a long time:
Bipartisan outreach and dialogue
versus
Partisan self-segregation and apartheid
It seems when we cluster with like-minded people, our respective information sources become more limited in scope and our respective viewpoints turn more extreme. Thus, opposing sides find each other ever more incomprehensible ... almost like a bad marriage whose combatants no longer communicate.
Yes, I know. If TAO is reading this comment, he will probably say: NO, NOT AGAIN, OCTO (along with some choice epithets).
But my point is: The impasse and gridlock in Washington is like a bad marriage bringing the country to a bad end, and we need to find moderate and sincere conservatives with whom we CAN carry on a conversation and demonstrate how to break an impasse
The Intelligence Squared site seems a good place to start a dialogue ... and share mind-changing information.
Nance, please don't lose yourself in it. We need you.
We don't need to be formal about the "News To Me" idea, do we?
ReplyDeleteI mean if any of us comes up with some interesting links, we can just post them under the heading "News To Me?"
I think it's a great idea, and Nance, the link to Intelligence Squared is great.
Thanks for this very informative post.
I am very happy and willing to see News To Me be a regular feature.
ReplyDeleteOcto, I've been reading hard and learning fast about Wall St., regulation, un-regulated free market myths, etc. since '07. It's been of some help to learn the immediate, personal, and systemic operational causes of market cycles and abuses.
But I think my gut instinct as an investor, that intuitive "short-form" situational awareness that powered a car-alarm warning for me, was based on what I'd gleaned from ALL the landscape: history, ecology, geography, philosophy, etc. One part of my mind watches for specific pieces of information and the other stirs those pieces into the big mix.
In other words, in the aftermath, when it comes to The Great Recession, I'm looking for facts to explain what we all sensed was coming, what we knew to expect.
My big job before I exit the ecosystem is to trust my short form of knowing, instead of trusting some jerk-head "expert." Not an easy thing--maybe partly because I disempower myself as a female in the traditionally male world of finance. Elizabeth Warren is my current Super Hero.
And there were some very quotable bits in your comment here--may I?
Tom,
I haven't seen either movie, but I think I'm up for a back-to-back viewing of the two on DVD when they are both available. It's no way to learn economics, but it might be a great way to consolidate a good case of pissed-off.
SoBeale,
I just need Intelligence Squared to tackle more subjects, more often. There's are short debates available to podcast, too, and they fill in some issue gaps.