(See, it's true - we Democrats are elitist. We can't help it. It's in our nature: we want the "elite" - the smartest, best and kindest - to be in charge. Why is that bad?)
Most of what I knew about Steve Pearce was that he was a featureless Republican rubber stamp, with no real personality and limited reason to exist. A wholly-owned subsidiary of the oil companies. A faceless, balding cipher who never had an original thought that wasn't given to him by Turdblossom and Associates.
Articles stolen from the Heritage Foundation were printed under Pearce's byline in small newspapers across New Mexico back in 2005. (His press secretary took the fall for him, so A+ for loyalty, but a big F for, you know, honesty and the like...)
He really only had one accomplishment to justify his existence. When the execrable Heather Wilson decided to give up her seat in the House of Representatives and try to jump into the Senate, Pearce kicked her butt, and then had the good grace to be defeated by Tom Udall (D-NM).
He's been endorsed by Sarah Palin, which might just be the kiss of death for him. Of course, with that nomination comes the requirement, apparently, to say blatantly ignorant crap, like refusing to admit that Obama is an American citizen.
If you're in a hurry, the lady's meds are wearing off, and she rambles on for the first 90 seconds of the video, trying to sound rational as she asks "Isn't the world about to end because we elected a Black Foreigner to a White House?" At about the 1:31 mark, Pearce tries to sound rational with "Barack Obama raised the most significant issues himself," and repeats the debunked lie that Obama traveled to Pakistan when it was illegal for Americans to be there.
Sorry, Stevie. No such ban ever existed, but the fact that you think there was... Well, a good Birther isn't willing to give up on a lie just because reality is rude enough to disagree, right?
If things follow their usual course with Stevie, he should be saying that Obama is a Muslim who pals around with terrorists next. He's a good follower; he'll say whatever he's told to say.
But that's not the only lie he wants to push forward. You wander around his website, and you find this page, where Stevie, or his Campaign Plagiarism Manager, writes:
Christians are just sick and tired of turning the other cheek while our courts strip us of all our rights. Our parents and grandparents taught us to pray before eating, to pray before we go to sleep. Our Bible tells us to pray without ceasing. Now a handful of people and their lawyers are telling us to cease praying.Sorry, Stevie, that's another lie. Nobody is trying to "take (y)our rights away." You just don't get to pay for it with the government's money.
God, help us. And if that last sentence offends you, well, just sue me.
The silent majority has been silent too long. It's time we tell that one or two who scream loud enough to be heard that the vast majority doesn't care what they want. It is time that the majority rules! It's time we tell them, "You don't have to pray; you don't have to say the Pledge of Allegiance; you don't have to believe in God or attend services that honour Him. That is your right, and we will honour your right; but by golly, you are no longer going to take our rights away. We are fighting back, and we WILL WIN!"
I mean, I could be snide and point out that the vast majority of America used to have no problem with enslaving blacks, either. Instead... well, since you brought up what the Bible says about prayer, how come your mindless ilk can never seem to remember what else it said?
And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.Yeah, sorry, Stevie. That's Jesus that just called you a hypocrite, not me.
But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly. (Matthew 6:5-6)
Oh, and you know that six years in the House of Representatives? Just think of it as your reward. We're done with you now.
That was smokin'!
ReplyDeleteThe point can't be made too often: no one among Democrats and liberals is trying to take away religious freedoms; we are trying to insure them by avoiding nationalized religion and welcoming religious diversity in America.
"thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are"
ReplyDeleteAnd one wonders why there's no call to engrave that one over all the courthouse doors in Dixie.
The nonsense about an attack on Christianity by godless liberals ( Jews, Atheists, Muslims, Commies, witches, pagans, Deists, Gnostics, agnostics and secular humanists) is the same gambit that appears in literature and history over and over again as the tool of tyrants and tinhorn politicians looking for cheap publicity and expensive contributions. Posing as, or actually being victimized seems to be good for the survival of any movement and very good for its secular power. These ignorant, hypocritical blowhards are just trying to ride into Jerusalem on a borrowed ass.
You know, the American Revolution itself was once portrayed as an attack on Christian values and with the inevitable gospel quotes given in support.
Just completed my paper on Fascism and one definition of it is that (paraphrasing) "it ignores truth and state that science is subjective"
ReplyDeleteSounds like Glen Beck and the Tea Party to me!
"You don't have to pray; you don't have to say the Pledge of Allegiance; you don't have to believe in God or attend services that honour Him. That is your right, and we will honour your right; but by golly, you are no longer going to take our rights away. We are fighting back, and we WILL WIN!"--SP
ReplyDeleteWhat a meathead. And the people who listen to and agree with hime are worse.
There isn't a shred of truth to what this hack said in his speech.
But it feeds into certain Christians' victimhood.
There isn't a Christian in this country who has been deprived of his or her right to pray. All he or she has to do is bow his/her head and do so.
What this asshat is talking about is Christians being stopped from imposing their prayers on a secular, tax supported venue. They can't do that and it pisses them off.
That sort of stupidity is offensive. And this jerk will probably win in a landslide.
Ugh.
Nicely said, Shaw. I've been trying to make that point since my hair was brown and I wore size 29 pants and I have to believe that these people cherish the notion of being persecuted as though it were a halo instead of a tactical lie. It's not persecution to keep you from persecuting others.
ReplyDeleteThe Poles are attacking Germany!
Spain sank our battleship!
Mexico is shedding American blood on American soil.
Saddam Hussein has nuclear and chemical weapons!
Same old Mierda. People treasure the illusion of victimhood as much as it's used to exploit them - remember Jonesstown where the 'government' was coming to get them so they had to kill themselves?
After nearly 2000 years of persecuting others, we're still hearing about the persecution of Christians - is it a way of avoiding self-examination, a way of rallying the troops or a way of exploiting the gullible?
I'm tired of it too.
Because it's so easy to persecute a majority party, isn't it? Especially when you define persecution as 'not being allowed to interfere with other people's lives.'
ReplyDelete