I mean, yeah, despite the name of your state, you fucked over the Native Americans living there, with various groups of Europeans alternately arming rival tribes so that they could pretty much wipe each other out before you pushed them off their land. But we were doing that all over the country, right?
Indiana has big chunks of the history we learned in school (well, you know, those of us who learned things in school, anyway): splitting off from the Northwest Territory, Tecumseh, the War of 1812, George Rogers Clark, William Henry Harrison - you can't avoid Indiana if you're studying the history of this country.
But it's weird. You, as a state, have this weird love of taking control of people's bodies away from them. It's like some kind of weird compulsion: "You are cattle! You will breed when and where we tell you! Und Indiana vill grow strong!!"
I mean, crap! What the hell is wrong with you people?
In 1907, Governor Frank Hanly, a good Republican, made Indiana the first state to practice eugenics when he signed the Compulsory Sterilization Law “to prevent procreation of confirmed criminals, idiots, imbeciles and rapists.”
The next governor, who was apparently less of a fan of fascism, stopped it two years later, and the law was found unconstitutional when it finally made it to the Indiana Supreme Court 14 years later! (the wheels of "justice" don't exactly spin quickly in the Hoosier state).
This flourishing of freedom and American values apparently made the people of Indiana cranky, because six years later, they pushed through an almost identical bill, which applied to "inmates of state institutions, who are insane, idiotic, imbecile, feebleminded, and epileptic, and who by the laws of heredity are the probable potential parents of socially inadequate offspring likewise afflicted." A law which stayed in effect in Indiana until 1974.
Despite their efforts to breed die Herrenrasse clear up to the Disco Era, Dan Quayle was still born in Indianapolis. Which tells you just how effective these policies actually are.
And now they're at it again. Republicans in Indiana have introduced a bill to make abortions illegal after 20 weeks. And when state Rep. Gail Riecken (D-Of Course) introduced an amendment to exempt "women who became pregnant due to rape or incest, or women for whom pregnancy threatens their life or could cause serious and irreversible physical harm," it was voted down 42 to 54.
"Oh, I'm sorry. Your baby is going to kill you? Tough shit. Hope you got a will." Interesting definition of Right to Life.
Apparently, according to state Rep. Eric Turner (R-Fuck You), this amendment would give women a "giant loophole" and they would just lie about getting raped. Or, presumably, dying.
(So, Eric Turner is a big supporter of incestuous families - I wonder what that says about his home life?)
I mean, there's really no excuse for this. Indiana ranks as the thirteenth smartest state, which... you know... top third, right? Good solid B average. And you've got Notre Dame... OK, admittedly a bad choice, being a Catholic university and all. But there's still Purdue! You've got education in your state! Why are you trying to go back to the dark ages?
But more than that, why is it that crazy people tend to rise to the top in Indiana? I mean, Michael Jackson, who single-handedly set out to destroy pop music forever, was born and raised in Gary, Indiana.
John Dillinger, gangster, bank robber, and legendary cocksman, was born in Indianapolis. Ten years later and 50 miles southwest, Jimmy Hoffa was born in Brazil, Indiana, and we still don't know where that fucker ended up.
There's just something about Indiana that makes crazy people end up getting into positions of power.
Like Carlos F. Lam, the Indiana prosecutor who ended up resigning after his advice to Wisconsin governor Scott Walker became public: Lam suggested Walker should fake an attack on himself to "discredit the unions." (To his credit, how was he to know that Walker had already discarded that idea because it might have backfired on him?)
And then, just because Indiana lawmakers hadn't embarrassed themselves enough, we get to find out about Ms. Bei Bei Shuai.
The facts of this case are heartbreaking. On December 23, 2010, Shuai, a 34-year-old pregnant woman who was suffering from a major depressive disorder, attempted to take her own life. Friends found her in time and persuaded her to get help. Six days later, Shuai underwent cesarean surgery and delivered a premature newborn girl who, tragically, died four days later.We need a new word for this crime. I'd like to suggest "Indianacide."
On March 14, 2011, Shuai was arrested, jailed, and charged with murder and attempted feticide...
The state is misconstruing the criminal laws in this case in such a way that any pregnant woman could be prosecuted for doing (or attempting) anything that may put her health at risk, regardless of the outcome of her pregnancy.
That's right: according to the ways the laws are being applied here, the state of Indiana believes that any pregnant woman who smokes or lives with a smoker, who works long hours on her feet, who is overweight, who doesn't exercise, or who fails to get regular prenatal care, is a felon.
So, we're opposed to big government. Unless we're allowed to use it to monitor every action of every pregnant woman in the state? Is that how this works?
But hey, say what you want about Indiana, at least the trains run on time, right?
Shared this on FB. As I've asked so many times, what is it about the people, especially minorities and women, who vote for these creeps?
ReplyDeleteGood read.
I put up a video on the jerk in the Indiana state house who worries about women faking rape and incest in order to get abortions.
ReplyDeleteAs I wrote on my blog, it is really, really difficult keeping up with the abominations that belong to the GOP.
I'm cross-posting this over at my blog.
This happened in Feb. of 2010 in this backward, anti-woman country:
ReplyDeleteLife can't get much worse for Christine Taylor. Last month, after an upsetting phone conversation with her estranged husband, Ms. Taylor became light-headed and fell down a flight of stairs in her home. Paramedics rushed to the scene and ultimately declared her healthy. However, since she was pregnant with her third child at the time, Taylor thought it would be best to be seen at the local ER to make sure her fetus was unharmed.
That's when things got really bad and really crazy. Alone, distraught, and frightened, Taylor confided in the nurse treating her that she hadn't always been sure she'd wanted this baby, now that she was single and unemployed. She'd considered both adoption and abortion before ultimately deciding to keep the child. The nurse then summoned a doctor, who questioned her further about her thoughts on ending the pregnancy. Next thing Taylor knew, she was being arrested for attempted feticide. Apparently the nurse and doctor thought that Taylor threw herself down the stairs on purpose.
According to Iowa state law, attempted feticide is an trying "to intentionally terminate a human pregnancy, with the knowledge and voluntary consent of the pregnant person, after the end of the second trimester of the pregnancy." At least 37 states have similar laws. Taylor spent two days in jail before being released. That's right, a pregnant woman was jailed for admitting to thinking about an abortion at some point early in her pregnancy and then having the audacity to fall down some stairs a couple of months later. Please tell me you find this as horrifying as I do.
SOURCE
The right wing radical hate that is seeping into all aspects of American life is terrifying. They advertise their evil with a sugar pill and too many people fall for it.
ReplyDeletethe country is going crazy and we don't seem to be able to do a thing about it. Of course, it might help if we had a president who gave a damn about the truth and about common decency, instead of doing nothing but selling out to the Republicans out of fear that, if he did the right thing for once, they might be able to use it to campaign against him.
ReplyDeleteAmerican government is irrelevant. It is owned and run by the corporate collective. Reagan killed the unions. And democracy finally died under Bill Clinton's watch (when he dismantled Glass-Steagall).
ReplyDeleteObama is the current front man, stooge and public hypnotist. Should he actually undertake any real reform he'd be eradicated. He was/is even more owned than Hillary.
I hate all this pissing in teacups on this blog. It isn't the Republicans. It isn't the Democrats. It's the corporations, folks, and we've all been sold out—or supporting their mission and collecting the bonus checks.
Want a fix on America? It produces nothing but weapons. More than 48% of its national budget goes into the MIC. It has truly become the Evil Empire.
Nameless, you're a good writer and funny 'n' all, but where are the real solutions? This bitching about a million tiny cuts is killing me...
Is anybody out there willing to tackle the big picture?
Well, Edgy, funny thing.
ReplyDeleteSometimes, a doctor can't fight the underlying disease, because the symptoms are going to kill the patient in the meantime.
And then again, I can't help but notice your byline on a number of entries here. Why aren't you fixing the problem?
Trying to. And thoroughly bashed and ostracized for my efforts here in the region, thank you. And currently without a paying gig.
ReplyDeleteNo disrepect, but I was suggesting that the patient may already be dead. (Democracy, that is.)
And about treating the symptoms and not the disease? Never a successful strategy. Advil makes one feel better but at some point one faces the cancer and cuts out the tumor... in this case the belief that capitalism = the free world. Nothing could be further from the truth, and yet we've put the capitalists in charge... Do we think they're going to cut out the tumor? No, they're going to be buggering us up every time we try to treat another symptom.
ReplyDeleteThat's the difference between being tactical (death by a million tiny cuts) and strategic (eradicating the enemy). But being strategic takes vision—and courage, and motivation. All sadly lacking at the moment...
Octopus is still preoccupied with house closing and moving details (complications, complications!), but I am taking a brief respite to comment on this topic.
ReplyDeleteWhether the patient is sick or terminal seems a moot discussion inasmuch as we can't afford under any circumstances any fatality here. Which would you prefer: Civilization or inverse totalitarianism? Whatever it takes, we cannot allow a corporatist takeover of our lives, our financial security, and the welfare of future generations ... regardless of whether it takes a year, a decade, or class warfare in the streets.
I am willing to be patient and support our President, but I am totally unwilling to surrender ... whatever the cost!
OK. Real solutions? Raise corporate taxes. Punish (ostracize or tax) corporations that trade globally but reduce jobs locally. Raise personal taxes on high income earners to 1960 levels to pay off federal debt. Gas the private health care system, which is at least 5 times more expensive to administer. Eliminate corporate contributions to political candidates and parties and outlaw corporate lobbying. Provide public funding for all candidates and limit campaign expenses. Nationalize the Federal Reserve. Break the media monopolies and increase media ownership diversity. Dramatically increase public investment in alternative energy generation as well as in public transportation. Increase gas-guzzler taxes and reward tele-commuting and high-mileage modes of transportation. Increase public funding for US based production and especially R&D. Set up and ensure protection for labor groups. And finally, rebuild the collective national trust in a future-forward America—in which all citizens may benefit.
ReplyDeleteAnd where is Obama on any of this simple, common-sense agenda? Nowhere. Patience is not what this patient needs...
Have to agree with you on all but the first two points. Raise corporate taxes? Hell, close the loopholes that keep the big ones from paying anything - raising them will unfairly punish the little guys, and hardly faze the ones currently paying nothing.
ReplyDeleteAnd technically, rather than raising taxes on high earners, just let the Bush tax cuts expire.
Well, that would be a good beginning. But given how deeply the country is indebted I think a more aggressive approach might be required...
ReplyDelete