Now, my family has been in this country for 6 generations which should be long enough to consider oneself an American, but particularly here in the South, it isn't -- at least if you're a Hindu, Muslim, Jew or none of the above. If you're one of those, you probably, like me, wish the mood of the country was less of a relentless crusade and more of the attitude: you go to your church, I'll go to mine, but the rest, like a veteran's cemetery, is neutral ground.
This weekend, as expected, I'm getting forwarded messages about "treasuring our war dead" and supporting the troops and how we'd all be shackled slaves if it weren't for the US military bombing all those third world countries and kidnapping people like Noriega and overthrowing any democracy that seemed too socialist. Of course I'm one of those emotional types who is known to get teary-eyed at war memorials, but it's more about the lost youth and the precariousness of life than the glory of war and the glory of Jesus the divine ( or Yahweh, or any of the infinite number of gods we go to war for.) We've lost enough over the glory of some myth, thank you very much. If the flag pin patriots don't mind, I'd rather reflect on history by myself rather than to conform to some ever more sectarian ritual of self congratulatory jingoism.
I don't think I'm alone or out of the mainstream to think that a cornerstone of our country was religious neutrality; a country where the government neither supported or suppressed any religion, any god and in the name of freedom -- but that mainstream seems rather silted up and narrow and unnavigable on occasions like this when people who speak for our government decide their personal gods are superior to those silly, second-rate gods of others and the courts share their smug, condescending crusade.
So when the Rev. Scott Rainey decided to give a Memorial Day invocation, as he's been doing for a couple of years at the Huston National Cemetery and which closed with
"While respecting people of every faith today, it is in the name of Jesus Christ, the risen Lord, that I pray. Amen."The Veterans Administration said no, you don't and presumably because it's not a Christian cemetery exclusively for Christians and because doing so at least hints at the establishment of a preferred state religion. Apparently Texans are offended that some heathen would dare to sit in the front of America's bus and took it to court. It being Texas, a judge arrogated that the government cannot
"gag citizens. . . in some bureaucrat's notion of cultural homogeneity"Not even if that bureaucrat wrote the First Amendment. In fact it's the court's notion of homogeneity, that we're all Christians here, that it's a christian universe but we'll allow you lesser folks to sit in the back if you keep quiet, that stinks up the polluted air of Texas.
Thus spake U.S. District Judge Lynn Hughes, God's own pimp. Did the VA have the right? Was this an unconstitutional integration of church and state? Was this about 'homogeneity' or about respect for the feelings and rights of others including the non-Christian dead? Even if not, it's a slap in the face, whether thoughtless or intentional, to every atheist who died in a foxhole, every Navaho, every Jew, Every Muslim or Buddhist or follower of Shinto who served in our armed forces and the families who honor them and mourn them today. They are ours, not the property of Hughes or Rainey or the State of Texas and not to be used as a sales tool and if there is some special circle for such people, may they reach it soon.
Captain, I agree with you 100%. I also hope that the VA has the funds to pursue an appeal to a higher court. This wasn't about cultural homogeneity. This sounds a lot like using a secular commemoration of all the people who have served in this country's armed forces to promote a single religious belief over all others and that smells like a violation of the anti-establishment clause. Maybe Judge Hughes missed the day that the 1st amendment was discussed in his/her Con Law class.
ReplyDeleteWhile I don't appreciate a blanket characterization of a belief in a higher power by any name as indicative that the believer is brain damaged, I also believe that church and state are best left separated and that it is an insult to non-Christian believers, atheists, agnostics, and those that worship the moon goddess to parade out Christian prayers at secular events. In fact, I don't believe that even if the spirit of the event is about remembrance that it is appropriate nor constitutional to force all the attendees to be a part of what is distinctly a Christian prayer.
I have been continually annoyed with our state legislature because each day that it is in session, both the House and the Senate open with a prayer in which the name of Jesus is invoked. From what I've gathered, this is a common practice across the country, although some legislatures do invite guests from different faiths to come in and offer the occasional prayer. However, I don't think that these guests are ever Muslim, Hindu, Buddhists, or atheists.
I can't find any evidence that this practice has ever been challenged. I need my job and I'm just not ready to bring a lawsuit that will have my name reviled in all 100 counties in North Carolina but I do speak in hushed whispers about what seems to me to be a blatant violation of the anti-establishment clause with close friends and family.
The latest blatant offense is an email flyer that all legislative employees received on Thursday announcing an historic event, the North Carolina National Call To Prayer Day to take place on June 20th at the State Capitol Bldg. According to the web site, NC is one of 20 states working on establishing legislative prayer caucuses. You may want to check and see what your state is doing. Eveidently there is alread a group identifying itself as the the Congressional Prayer Caucus Foundation, Inc..
The NC flyer proudly declares that the purposes of this historic event are:
• Supporting the formation of the North Carolina Legislative Prayer Caucus, a bi-partisan
group of state legislators united to defend America’s right to trust in God
• Signing the North Carolina Call to Prayer Proclamation
• Re-affirmation of our national motto – In God We Trust
A special little touch is that the accompanying email lists the names of the legislators who have signed on to support this event. So far it's only 30 out of 175 (mostly Republican but some Democrats) but I have no doubt there will be others. No one wants to be accused of being anti-Christian. Elections are next year.
As I can't quite let this issue go, I wonder if y'all (meaning anyone who reads this blog) could help me out by leaving a simple yes or no as to whether your state legislature prays before, after, or during its legislative session and as to whether it has stared a legislative prayer caucus. Thanks from she-who-is-likely-to-be-unemployed.
Last paragraph, 3rd line, the word is "started" not stared.
ReplyDeleteThe Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) has been filing lawsuits to enjoin both the National Day of Prayer and similar events in other states (Arizona). They were successful but now the ruling is under appeal.
ReplyDeleteThe courts have found a new tactic to obfuscate such actions by saying that FFRF has "no standing" to bring suit. You see, the court is saying that non-believers are not compelled at the point of a gun to pray or attend church, hence: no harm.
Even though the Establishment Clause specifically states "Congress shall make no law..." congress has passed a law,: the National Day of Prayer! So apparently according to the court, congress can sidestep the Constitution as long as nobody is (physically) abused by the law.
Sheria,
ReplyDeleteI don't know whether the legislature here prays before they prey on us. I suspect they do, but I'm not going to ruin my weekend by looking it up! I do know that most organizations I belong to have been bullied into the ritual swearing that America is "under God" which to my way of thinking is just what the 3rd commandment defines as a vain use. But you know it's not about religion, it's about tribalism and about power -- the kind of thing that had Europe embroiled in religious wars almost forever.
We're all brain damaged, or at least irrational. None of us know everything or even enough, but I think a lot of non believers are in the same boat as you in needing to be quiet or risk repercussions. It's certainly always been that way for me and although some would like to tell you there are "new atheists" I don't buy it. I think it's just that more agnostics and free thinkers and secular humanists are willing to risk coming out of the closet, so to speak. In most of Europe, it's quite different, for what that's worth. We are one of the most overtly, in your face, religious activists anywhere, in my opinion and I think it's more difficult to express one's opinions now than it was 50 years ago.
"defend America’s right to trust in God"
Now isn't that an obnoxious scam? As if my disbelief takes away their rights - any rights! It's America's right to trust or not to trust or believe or not to believe at stake and that's what they're trying to do with slogans and pretend victimhood. It's nothing short of preferential treatment for a certain group of religions they're demanding.
It's just like the BS about "supporting the troops" when they're trying to promote an illegal or immoral or useless war. Verbal chicanery.
These people are trying to marginalize American citizens of different religious persuasions and to me it's no different, despite their pathetic rhetoric, than any other kind of retail bigotry.
RtS,
It's not just the national day of prayer, it's also the laws in some states that require a belief in God to hold public office and laws such as some counties here have, that require a student to recite a religious oath at school.
Captain, we are in full agreement; it is retail bigotry.
ReplyDeleteI'm appalled that public schools are getting away with making students recite a religious oath. The SCOTUS ruled on prayer in schools years ago. I remember because there were a lot of protests that they were killing Christianity. In NC, a favorite campaign speech is about how we need to get prayer back in schools if we want children to learn, stop doing drugs and alcohol, practice abstinence, and stop beating the hell out of each other in the school bathrooms. Yeah, I know it's laughable but I swear I can't make this stuff up!
If this National Day of Prayer was confined to promotion by churches I would argue that it was a legal action not prohibited under law as the 1st amendment guarantees the free practice of religion without government interference. However, this isn't a church or temple or mosque etc. thing, this is sponsored by members of the state and federal legislatures and the government is not to sponsor any religion!
One of the things that bothers me in our courts is that while a witness may ask not to be sworn in on the Bible, if your witness doesn't take the religious oath, then the jury looks at that witness as untruthful and a minion of Satan. Allowing the swearing of an oath to tell the truth on the Bible is prejudicial and in my legal opinion a constitutional violation of separation of church and state. Whether or not a person believes in God should not be a litmus test for whether or not he or she will testify truthfully. When you move the religion question out of the arena of personal private belief then I totally understand the level of frustration created by this unholy merger of Christianity and the state.
Well, if they're going to go and have a National Prayer Day, I INSIST that the Dinosaur Gods be included in the general benefaction. I also think the Greek Olympians should be included -- they're among my personal favorites....
ReplyDeleteHey, Jupiter Optimus Maximus! Hare Krishna and as far as the beliefs of anything taller than my house and with teeth - thy god is my god.
ReplyDeleteAs I think I said, there seems to be a great deal of support from religious leaders for a separation. Watching HBO's The Borgias reminded me of the thousand year horror of ecclesiastical power. It's the politicians using poor old god as a ventriloquist's dummy making the fuss and stirring up the superstitious and the tribal crusaders. "God wills it" may be the scariest words ever spoken.
Of course statistics, that annoying discipline suggests that crime and other social ills like alcoholism thrive quite well in areas we sometimes call the "Bible Belt" and have more to do with poverty and low education levels then with church attendance and bombastic preaching.
This is an ancient fight though and I expect my great great grandchildren to be fighting the same battle.