To be honest, it's understandable: she and Marcus have five children of their own, and they've taken in 23 foster children, all girls. (They had to be girls: Marcus only has so much self-control, after all...)
However, this sounds like it leads to an interesting opportunity. If you're a homeless girl between the ages of 15 and 25, and you have the misfortune to live in Michigan, just go down to the Bachmann ranch. Slip in when nobody's looking, keep your head down and try to assimilate. How could anybody notice?
(If you're a homeless male, of course, your only choice is to join the endless stream of closed-mouthed rentboys going in the back door - so to speak - of Bachmann's clinic.)
Try to imagine growing up in Michelle Bachmann's house. If you're like me, you imagine it's all pillowfights and long, lingering hot showers; the reality, of course, would probably be more like those women's prison movies that became so popular in the 60s and 70s.
Except, of course, that as it turns out, the true reality isn't quite as it seems, either.
See, for most of us, "foster children" indicates a long-term commitment: yeah, maybe you get them in their teens, but you raise them. This myth spread by the Bachmann camp tells us what a wonderful, sharing person Michele is, opening her home so many times, to so many troubled girls. She said, in interviews, that she "raised" 23 foster children.
The truth is, Bachmann and her husband got a license to counsel girls with eating disorders. They lived in her house: some for a week, some for a year or so.
Bachmann often says she has "raised" 23 foster children. That may be a bit of a stretch. According to the Minnesota Department of Human Services, Bachmann's license, which she had for 7 1/2 years, allowed her to care for up to three children at a time. According to Kris Harvieux, a former senior social worker in the foster care system in Bachmann's county, some placements were almost certainly short term. "Some of them you have for a week. Some of them you have for three years, some you have for six months," says Harvieux, who also served as a foster parent herself. "She makes it sound like she got them at birth and raised them to adulthood, but that's not true."But she keeps saying that she's "raised" 23 kids. And that's because Bachmann isn't afraid to lie to make a point.
Yet Bachmann clearly had some of her foster children long enough to enroll them in local schools, and it was through them that she got involved in school politics. While she taught her own children at home before sending them to private Christian schools, state law required foster kids to go to public school. Seeing their curriculum, she became convinced that "politically correct attitudes, values, and beliefs" had supplanted objective education. She helped found a charter school but soon left the board amid allegations that she was trying to inject Christianity into the curriculum. Then, in 1999, she decided to run for the local school board.
That's what you have to keep in mind about Michele Bachmann. If she feels that she has a narrative that's important to make her point, she's more than happy to pretend that the story at the core of the narrative is true. Whether it is or not; it just has to conform to her agenda.
Like a few months ago, when, attempting to attack Rick Perry (September's GOP Flavor of the Month for the 2012
Bachmann first raised the issue during a Republican presidential debate on Monday as a swipe at Republican rival and Texas Governor Rick Perry, who issued an executive order in 2007 mandating girls get the HPV vaccine as part of a school immunization requirement. The order was later overturned.Of course, when she was later pressed for details as to how a vaccine which protected girls against the single most common cause of cervical cancer might be dangerous, she said that she met a woman who said her daughter became "mentally retarded" after getting the Gardasil vaccine.
In that forum, she questioned the state's authority to force "innocent little 12-year-old girls" to have a "government injection" that was "potentially dangerous."
This is a standard defense for the habitual liar: when called out for an unsupported spew of easily-debunked bullshit, they'll claim that somebody told them - it isn't their fault if somebody else is mistaken, is it?
(It's also interesting that this argument was over a vaccine that is specifically controversial among right-wing fundamentalists. Like Michele Bachman. Remember what I said earlier about lies which conform to her agenda?)
This is standard practice for Ms Bachmann. The more gentle among us might say that she "has a history of making inflammatory statements." But that isn't what's going on. The woman is a liar. Need more examples? She went on the Dennis Miller radio program and claimed things about the "Obamacare" bill that were just complete and utter crap.
"On the 16th page, it says whatever health care you have now, it’s going to be gone within five years. So your current health care plan, you’re not going to have in five years. What you’re going to have is a government plan and a federal bureau is going to decide what you get or if you get anything at all."In case anyone is curious, page 16 covered people whose healthcare plans would be grandfathered in - i.e., they'd get to keep it, not lose it.
She also claimed that 17 million illegal immigrants would start to get free healthcare under the bill. Ignoring the part that said "Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States."
(Factcheck.org has volumes of material on this woman.)
Michele Bachmann is never afraid to lie in support of what she considers a "higher truth." Because that's how her mind works.
I knew she had to be lying!! One of my friends here had foster children and I know how the system works.
ReplyDeleteAll,
ReplyDeleteMy litmus test for GOP candidates is simple: do they agree with Sister Sarah in what I've heard is her firm belief that dinosaurs and humans coexisted in the earliest times? I want them at least to get that issue right since the smarty-pants Democrats are of no use there. Naysayers all.... Why, they wouldn't recognize a dinosaur if it walked up to them and gave money to their campaign!
Does this mean Michelle Bachmann fits the definition of a pathological liar?
ReplyDeleteAnd to think, she still has 5% support among republicans in Iowa. Amazing!
RatNat - Bachmann is by no means pathological. She lies strictly on an agenda.
ReplyDeleteNewt is closer to pathological, and that's because, thinking himself the smartest man in the room, his agenda is slightly wider than hers.
Hell, Mittens is only pathologically in love with the idea of getting elected, to the point that he'll switch any position if he thinks you'll like him better.
Why is she waving that envelope around like a crazy lady?
ReplyDeleteAnd my reason for the season is cheese fondue and trifle!
Hells bells, virtually all GOP candidates have lied in some manner or another:
ReplyDeleteBachmann – as Nameless has noted above;
The Gingrich who stole Christmas – lying about his association with FM, claiming to be a historian when in fact he was a lobbyist (plus other lies too numerous to mention in one comment);
Cain – having The Audacity of Dishonesty in thinking he could brush off all those sexual harassment charges;
Romney – the veritable Leonard Zelig of American politics;
Santorum – lying to himself in thinking he has any brains for the job;
Perry – lying to himself in thinking he has any qualifications for the job;
Huntsman – lying to himself in thinking the rabid rabble would actually choose a moderate candidate.
The way today’s GOP picks their candidates: Slash-and-Burn Angry-Mob-O-Meter.
Captain,
Is Blue Moon ready yet?
Like the quest for a four-leaf clover, I'm sure if one looks long enough and hard enough, eventually, a Republican pol who doesn't lie easily and incessantly can be found. In the universe of all possible things, this, too, is possible.
ReplyDeleteJust don't hold your breath. ;)
Octo - I think you got your descriptions of Santorum and Perry backwards. Santorum isn't stupid, as such. He's just... he's just...
ReplyDeleteI can't even begin to express how off-the-rails the man is in less that a full page. Somebody go ask Pickled Baby Gabriel. Maybe he can explain it.
Nameless,
ReplyDeleteI understand Santa gave Baby Gabriel a dead puppy for Christmas, which made the Santorum household frothy and bright. Still more evidence of 'stupid,' don't you think? But if you insist on adding the words "fixated,' 'morbid,' and 'lunatic,' I'm in.