"With regards to immigration policy, that those that come here illegally should not be given favoritism or a special route to becoming residents or citizens that's not given to those people that stayed in line legally,"
-Willard Mitt Romney-
One would think, if one had the fortitude to spend more than a moment watching what passes for television news, that for the last half decade or so there were nothing of more than momentary interest happening than the American political circus and perpetual campaign. Geological and meteorological calamities do get reported, but the vast bulk of air time is given over to "the candidates" and the unchallenged lies they perpetrate. There are no pauses between campaigns, no half time shows and no seventh inning stretches.
I say circus although circuses are intended to be family entertainment these days and freak shows have gone the way of Times Square peep shows, cock fights and lynchings -- and sadly, the traces of any sense of shame, decency and honesty that ever had the audacity to interrupt or question the ragemongering has disappeared.
At the South Carolina Fox News debate Monday last (and I call it debate with all awareness of the inherent dishonesty of the appellation) Mitt Romney was booed, not because of what discernible policies he may be espousing at the moment, but because his father was born in Mexico. I don't recall any booing in response to John McCain's having been born in Panama, but of course anything done or said more than ten minutes ago is irrelevant in today's Republican world and that hobgoblin called consistency is always foolish.
George Romney, Mitt's father, entered the US illegally from Mexico, which might have given a better, more decent, less ambnitious Mitt pause before making such harsh statements about not tolerating any mercy for illegal Mexican immigrants, but of course it's a racial and ethnic issue, not an immigration one despite assurances to the contrary. The name is Romney after all, not Ramirez -- and this was South Carolina, Glossolalia, Holy Ghost Power and Rebel Flags, just he way God likes it.
But the mood of the South Carolinian Republican Rabble was ugly and when moderator Juan Williams asked if it wasn't a bit insulting to minorities when Newt Gingrich spewed that nonsense about black people needing to demand jobs instead of food stamps, as though the unemployment problem were caused by laziness and a president that encourages it, the
Is it any worse that they insist on being called 'conservatives' and not snarling beasts and that our only sources of news collaborate in that farce? Is it surprising that the state of South Carolina, still unrepentant for having been the first to take up arms against the United States, would once again boo at Ron Paul's suggestion that the 'Golden Rule' so often quoted as a core Christian value be applied in US foreign policy?
" Quit warmongering, stop going to war, and treat other nations like we want to be treated. "Hell, no! Boo the bastard! Ask not what Jesus would do, ask what Attila the Hun would do, what a tribe of savage head hunters and cannibals would do, what a pack of giggling, stinking hyenas would do while ripping and tearing at the corpse of America.
It's been suggested to me, that I should approach such people with a more polite demeanor -- that the people who have made most of human history a horror story need to be given a chance to discuss things, to debate things and that monsters and the people who promote monsters can be persuaded by kind words and reason to change.
Boooooooo!
Excellent post, Captain.
ReplyDeleteOne would run out of epithets trying to describe these Frankenstein's-Creature-persecuting, pitchfork-and-torchlight-bearing mobs that find themselves attracted to the Republican debates. But you've made a good start.
I actually watched the most recent one (South Carolina) as background TV while doing some Latin study. Fine as Latin is, it was a bit hard to concentrate thanks to the spectacle before my forward-scanning lizard eyes. The mobs seem to attend these debates solely for the purpose of carefully monitoring the candidates for any verboten signs of weakness such as decency or compassion or even sanity. And when they catch them out in such weakness, the hissing and booing begin in earnest.
If a bucketful of cute puppies were brought on stage, the mob would no doubt hiss the candidates into stomping on the poor critters just to show their good faith in the Grand Old Cause.
You gotta wonder -- do any of these candidates, even inwardly, pause to reflect now and then on the callousness and indecency of those whose good will and votes they court? Perhaps, but I have my doubts: reflection is another one of those signs of "weakness," and therefore it must be avoided at all costs.
"Is it any worse that they insist on being called 'conservatives' and not snarling beasts..."
ReplyDeleteBut...but "conservative," at least in Tralfamadorian, DOES mean "snarling beast." Perhaps the snarling earthbound South Carolinians are not familiar with that language?
Poo Tee Weet.
I'm waiting for the sequel: The Tea Party meets the Wolfman, or maybe Bride of Bachmann -- oh wait. . .
ReplyDeleteHollywood at it's cheesiest couldn't really pull off a Republican debate, although Godzilla Vs. Mothra did come close. For people who don't eat cheese, the Japanese do a good job of making it.
I think τρώγοντες των νεκρών means Conservative in Greek, but I'm not sure.