
He stops short of saying we ought to and of course it's illegal to clone humans in Europe and the US, but he thinks we might learn something important to our own future. Establishing a group of our long lost cousins and possible partial ancestors might show us that they were more intelligent, with their bigger brains or perhaps had some talents that we do not and might allow us an increase in human biodiversity.
"it's conceivable that their way of thinking could be beneficial" said Church to an interviewer from Der Spiegel.
Wayne LaPierre stated yesterday that a study should be initiated to determine the citizenship status of any non-Homo Sapiens clone born in the US or possessions so as to establish a Neanderthaler's right to keep and bear arms other than wooden spears. Several coaches and athletic associations have expressed interest in any such project, while Tea Party spokesmen have been rather unanimous in objecting to allowing such clones to take 'human' jobs as much as they would welcome them into the party ranks, should their intelligence not be too great.
Cloning humans, or even almost humans is illegal, sure, but America is waiting.
Harvard professor seeks adventurous woman to carry Neanderthal baby. A suitable volunteer: OctoMom.
ReplyDeleteAdventurous woman? You mean like Rogue and Maverick Grizzly mom Sarah?
ReplyDeleteHow fitting!
Captain,
ReplyDeleteIt seems I missed a cue. Re-reading the above link, it should have said:
"Harvard Neanderthal seeks adventurous woman for a shtup."
I agree with you about Mama Grizzly. For a person who spent half her life trickling down on pregnancy test strip, she's as good a candidate as any for the supply-side.
But if the offspring turns out to be a subhuman brute, how will we know it's not from the mother's side?
ReplyDelete