Friday, March 21, 2014

The Liar's Crusade

Reckless and incompetent expounders of Holy Scripture bring untold trouble and sorrow on their wiser brethren when they are caught in one of their mischievous false opinions and are taken to task by those who are not bound by the authority of our sacred books. For then, to defend their utterly foolish and obviously untrue statements, they will try to call upon Holy Scripture for proof and even recite from memory many passages which they think support their position, although they understand neither what they say nor the things about which they make assertion.

--Saint Augustine:  De Genesi ad litteram libri duodecim --

______________________

Well you knew it was going to happen.  When it comes to a vessel big enough to contain the egos of the illiterate Biblical literalists, the world is not enough and if anything can expand, can inflate faster than the early universe, it's those very egos who insist we consider their idiotic, superstitious, fatuous and fact-free delusions to be reasonable alternatives to demonstrated and proven physical law.

Too bad that moronic mob of pretenders to received authority know as little about Christianity and its foundations as they know about nature as revealed in science and mathematics. Anything once rational and functional in early Christianity seems to have shed those attributes as vestigial organs, like the hip bones in a whale as an example of just how evolution works in all things.

There is nothing about the origin of species in the Fox TV series Cosmos that is without massive evidential support or that hasn't been thoroughly and repeatedly demonstrated in the fossil record and in the laboratory. The truth is that DNA based life forms not only can and do but must evolve over long periods of time into quite different life forms because of the mechanisms involved.  To argue otherwise is either dishonest or stupid or pathological.  Face it, only if one is staggeringly uninformed about basic physics and chemistry, geology and paleontology or mentally impaired and basically dishonest, is there any need to treat the fundamentals of science and mathematics as "opinions" that can honestly and reasonably be held by honest and reasonable people.

Few people would take the argument that because one can't come up with a final figure for Pi all numbers are so equally probable that I can't be mocked for saying it's 4 or worse. Would anyone honestly assert that I must be allowed in every classroom to insist that it's 4 because there's an old paleolithic legend I choose to delude myself with?  But it seems that there are more than a few who will, for many sinister and stupid reasons, tell you that facts are irrelevant and demand the right to interrupt your evening's entertainment and your offspring's education to demand respect for stupidity.

Danny Falkner, of Answers In Genesis showed up on the "Christ Centered" Janet Mefford Show  yesterday to accuse the Fox television series and its host, Neil deGrasse Tyson, of "marginalizing" those marginally rational and totally dishonest delusionals with "dissenting"  views on accepted scientific truths, reports Right Wing Watch. They say it's only fair to be allowed to refute the irrefutable -- and because they "believe" and belief is all they need to shut you up.

“Boy, but when you have so many scientists who simply do not accept Darwinian evolution, it seems to me that that might be something to throw in there, you know, the old, ‘some scientists say this, others disagree and think this,’ but that’s not even allowed,” 

Said Mefford, and presumably there were nodding heads all over the halls of idiocy and  cesspits of mendacity.   It's frightening to think someone can think of getting away with asserting that we have "so many scientists" and can't see the inherent contradiction.  (If you prefer unsupportable tradition over science, you're not a scientist)

So perhaps we have so many football fans who think the Seahawks lost the Superbowl, that the Sun orbits the flat Earth and Methusala lived 900 years. I have the right to interrupt anyone to assert this and for free.  May I demand the right to show up in any church on any Sunday to insist that there is no Yahweh, no El or Elohim, no trinity, no creation and never could have been?  That Jesus was nothing but another of many, failed anti-Roman zealots, that there is no heaven, no hell, no sin, no forgiveness, no resurrection -- no spirits, demons, angels and no souls?  Do I have the right to set up an altar to Zog in every Church, synagogue, Temple, Mosque and public school?

And why the hell not? 

Because it's not about fairness. It's not about honesty, it's certainly not about freedom of speech or of belief .  As Salmon Rushdie said of Fundamentalism: it's about power. It's about bringing untold trouble and sorrow, it's the idiot's crusade.

7 comments:

  1. Only the stupid demand respect for stupidity.

    ReplyDelete
  2. A wonderful quotation from Saint Augustine.

    And a very truthful conclusion from you- even though it will be a cold day in Hell before you start seeing this simple truth finding its way into mainstream discussions.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey. I went to high school with Augie, so I got that first hand. But thanks. I Wish I could say that this is a tiny fringe element, but it's not. A large number of Americans deny science while using the results to do it and I fear it's our national disease which makes us the world's leper.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I wasn't at all surprised by the fanatical fundamentalists' outrage over this series. For the people who buy into myths over facts, those facts are frightening to hear, so for them it's best to believe in stories that provide temporary comfort and escape.

    I agree with Christopher Hitchens:

    "Our belief is not a belief. Our principles are not a faith. We do not rely solely upon science and reason, because these are necessary rather than sufficient factors, but we distrust anything that contradicts science or outrages reason. We may differ on many things, but what we respect is free inquiry, openmindedness, and the pursuit of ideas for their own sake."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Open mindedness often is a surrogate, a pseudonym for gullibility or intellectual capitulation. When I offer that there is no reason to assert things for which there is no evidence, that the statement is only supported by the argument from ignorance and more easily explained without reference to miracles, I'm accused of not being "open minded."

      Is it possible to be a fundamentalist and not be immune to reason? I have so often pointed out that every attempt I've seen to show the necessity for God is not only fallacious, but were it not so, it would prove an infinite number of gods to an equal extent. If God is anything and everything, it's no longer possible to assert anything about him/her/it.

      "Something must have caused our universe" beyond being an attempt at truth by assertion, does nothing to substantiate any particular religion; any entity at all or any particular characteristics of any deity or spirit. That something must have caused the decay of some particular atomic nucleus hardly argues for a divine hand or intelligent design and the notion that everything has a reason, is part of a plan is another faux axiom designed to keep your mind away from the idea -- readily demonstrable at the particle level -- that randomness underlies everything.

      Delete
  5. Augustine liked to cover his bases and have it both ways:
    "There is another form of temptation, even more fraught with danger. This is the disease of curiosity. It is this which drives us to try and discover the secrets of nature, those secrets which are beyond our understanding, which can avail us nothing and which man should not wish to learn." -Confessions

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm shocked to hear that such pillars of the Church could be hypocrites!

    I seem to remember that the Church had to admit that Galileo's toy did magnify images because he could read the names of ships others could not see, but they had to maintain it only worked when pointed at the horizon or below.

    Augustine was trying to preserve the credibility of Christianity by avoiding embarrassing situations. He was no friend of science, but the "don't make a dumb ass of yourself" recommendation seems to have been forgotten.

    ReplyDelete

We welcome civil discourse from all people but express no obligation to allow contributors and readers to be trolled. Any comment that sinks to the level of bigotry, defamation, personal insults, off-topic rants, and profanity will be deleted without notice.