Thursday, September 11, 2014
9/11
Riding my new bike yesterday, an elderly driver decided that the exit ramp was no longer the place for her and suddenly swerved back into the road without looking. It just so happens that's exactly where I was. I managed to avoid her at some risk of falling, but it happened so fast there was no question of using my horn and she simply continued on her way somewhere at ten under the limit. Why do I mention this? Because it's 9/11 again, the day of self pity and choreographed mourning and as the fellow on the news this morning said, "I used to feel invincible but now I feel so vulnerable."
Do we need a better example of how erratically, erroneously and stupidly people assess risk? If we were to make a statistically accurate list ranking the possibility of being harmed by a terrorist attack on any given day, would it be below a list of thousands of possibilities -- tens of thousands -- hundreds of thousands? But I didn't look over my shoulder in fear and dread getting on the bike on a sunny Wednesday afternoon and I'm not expecting an airplane to crash into my house in rural Florida today either. The chances of getting hurt by some nice old lady just a mile or so from home is almost incalculably larger, yet still small enough that I don't tremble in my steel toe boots thinking about the danger stalking the roads. Heart attacks, cancer, strokes, a fall in the bathroom, these are all things I legitimately worry about at my age and try to avoid. Terrorist attacks? Really? Isn't that an insult to people who wake up every morning in Syria, Iraq, Libya, Palestine, Israel, Lebanon?
But self pity and self absorption are so American. Beheadings and the other horrors of the day don't count so much unless it's an American head rolling and thousands dead anywhere hardly count in comparison to one possibly unjust American death.
I don't know how much Cola and shoes and Toyotas the obsession of the day will sell on CNN and Fox, but it sells fear by the carload. It sells so much fear that most of us still haven't noticed that we -- or our congress, that is, signed away the 4th amendment for the great majority of the country, that we began pumping up our police departments with heavy weaponry even in remote places like Wyoming in order to equip them for the hordes of Muslims falling from the sky over the Cheney ranch. It sold domestic surveillance, it sold countless quasi-military weapons. It sold the longest and most expensive wars in our history. We went to war with an uninvolved country and created so much chaos and so big a power vacuum that Iraq became helpless to keep out Al Qaeda and now ISIS.
But we still feel not only sorry for ourselves, but guilty for not feeling sorry enough. Eventually 9/11 will go the way of the Alamo, the Maine and Pearl Harbor, but not soon enough for me because as long as we weep and moan and fear to turn our heads lest a fearful beast pursues us, as long as we continue to conduct our petty civil wars, we won't do a damned thing about the real world and its real troubles.
Have nothing to add except I couldn't agree more Capt.
ReplyDeleteA reference to Obama’s “Michael Corleone Dilemma” caught my attention. It also reminds me of this Winston Churchill quote: “It is a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma …”
ReplyDeleteIf getting out of the family business is analogous to the USA getting out of Iraq, Obama is certainly dealing with a dilemma. Yet, I think the Winston Churchill quotation is more apt. This time around, there are dilemmas and riddles and mysteries, and the enigma is multi-layered.
A war-weary American public wants to disengage from Iraq; the rising threat of a savage entity tugs in the opposite direction.
Is ISIS the existential threat as claimed by our defense and foreign affairs establishment? This time around, the American public will want to vet all claims – having been burned by past fear mongering and false declarations of WMDs that never materialized.
Obama claims there will be “no boots on the ground” – reassuring words when your intended audience is a war weary American public. Suppose, however, your intended audience is the savage entity? Do you really want to say “no boots on the ground” when what you really should say is “all options are open!”
Finally, there is the layer of hyper-partisanship and the voices of nullification that blame Obama for anything and everything – for doing too little too late, for doing too much too soon, for waking up in the morning, for turning right or turning left on camera.
Is Obama’s Grand Strategy of the “willing and unable” a realistic one, or merely the best available compromise given a bad set of options?
Some genius once said that the simple truth is that nothing is simple. Another truth, simple or not, is that everything is marketing. Everything it seems, from particle physics to redneck politics, is like a turduckin with a lie or a fallacy or advertisement inside.
ReplyDeleteYou're right about the error of ruling out anything. It sets Obama up for the inevitable accusations no matter which way things go and you see it in Jack Kingston's, (R-Ga) comments Wednesday last.
Can Obama afford to be realistic when the most important thing is not to say anything the Party of Satan can't use against him even if he's successful? After such a carefully guarded and polished speech we never the less see the implication on the CNN screen the next day that the whole thing is Obama's fault. Posed as a question to give the slander some plausible deniability. Presented as bait to keep the haters tuned in, Tacitly suggesting but not saying anything they can be challenged on -- just askin'
Marketing of marketing - all is marketing.
How can the marketing of your marketing be your friend when your enemy has a bigger marketing budget than you have?
DeleteA salesman has no friends, only customers and potential customers.
Delete"Hi, we're the Koch brothers and we're here to help" Scary enough for you?