Monday, December 1, 2014

Are Democrats racist?

Wandering around the conservative end of the internet, every so often I'll slam up against the phrase "the Democrat Party is the most racist!" Usually misspelled, and often in all-caps.

It's easy to refute, but you end up knocking down the same arguments, over and over. For example:
The Democrats are the Party of the Klan
Now, it's true that Nathan Bedford Forrest was a Democrat even before he set up the first iteration of the Ku Klux Klan (there have been three, if you're curious). And it's also true that Abraham Lincoln was a Republican when he was first elected.

(Fun fact: Lincoln left the Republican Party at the end of his first term. Republicans are rarely aware of that: for his second term, Lincoln created the National Union Party, a coalition party made up of both Republicans and Democrats.)

But here's the thing: at that point in time, the Republican Party was liberal, and the Democratic Party was conservative. (This fact particularly angers the Teabaggers, who've been brainwashed to think that liberalism is synonymous with "evil.") And from the Civil War to about 1950, the Southern Democrats (sometimes called "Dixiecrats") were among the most conservative (and usually racist) people in America.

In 1948, though, Truman, as the Democratic candidate, put forward a very mild civil rights platform, and that was too much for the Southern Democrats: 35 of them walked out of the Democratic National Convention, and they split off into their own political party, called the States Rights Democratic Party (a.k.a. "Dixiecrats," a term which has been used ever since for hyper-conservative Southern Democrats).

The Dixiecrats ran Strom Thurmond for president, and actually managed to carry four states (Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi and South Carolina) along with one stray electoral vote from Tennessee. (Incidentally, that, plus the 39 electoral votes drained from Truman by Progressive Party nominee Henry A. Wallace, was expected to have produced a Republican victory, which is why we have the most famous newspaper flub of all time.)

The Dixiecrats never ran another presidential candidate, and eventually the party dissolved. And following that victory, the liberal Democrats became a stronger and stronger force in the party, eventually reversing the formerly conservative platforms, and passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

This same action, of course, drew the Republican Party to the right, in an effort to pick up the disillusioned Southern Democrats.

Following the 1964 Civil Rights act, LBJ famously said “I think we just lost the South,” which would prove to be remarkably prescient: in the late Sixties, Richard Nixon, with the help of his advisor Pat Buchanan, devised the "Southern Strategy," using dog-whistle racist terms (example: "states' rights" - the states would have the "right" to ignore these new civil rights laws).

In 1980, Ronald Reagan (working with Nixon's advisor Pat Buchanan) further honed the "Southern Strategy." In fact, it was another of his aides, Lee Atwater, who famously spilled the beans years later, thinking he was speaking off the record to a reporter.
You start out in 1954 by saying, "Nigger, nigger, nigger." By 1968 you can't say "nigger" — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me — because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "Nigger, nigger."
And that's where the Republican myth of the "racist Democrats" comes from: the Dixiecrats, and the changing face of the Democratic party. Back when Democrats were the conservative party, they were, in fact, racist; in swinging to the left, they also became the party of racial equality. To the point that, yes, the Ku Klux Klan may have been founded by Democrats, but these days, while not every Republican is in the KKK, almost every Klansman votes Republican.

__________________

Edit: (12/6/14) Corrected "North Carolina" to "South Carolina," with apologies to any North Carolinian in the audience.

14 comments:

  1. Shaw has a troll named 'scudrunner’ who has leveled this claim on several occasions. Each time, it offends me … infuriates me. And each time, I have posted comments similar to this article. Instead of reinventing the wheel, I can now link to this post and save myself time. Not that this will make a difference.

    Former Dixicrats – resurrected into Southern White Male Republicans - have a sleazy way of deflecting criticism:

    Distort, misquote, harp, carp, nitpick, accuse, slander, insult, heckle, taunt, and get angry. Never concede an argument (no matter how specious); always play the victim card (while painting your opponent in preposterously extreme terms verging on caricature); deny; attack, attack; repeat often.

    Liberals err in considering these Southern White Male bigots to be stupid. Quite the opposite. If there is one trick GOP strategists have mastered well: Never let a claim (even if true) go unchallenged. They know that labels, when repeated often enough, have a tendency to stick long after the adhesive dries; hence, conservatives make liberal use of deception, projection, historical revisionism, half-truths and untruths to counteract any adverse claim. In Republican parlance, the strategic lie is raised to the level of an artform. To counteract the counter actors, I offer a few humble talking points of my own:

    You might be a Dixicrat if ...

    You are still holding Confederate money because you think the South will rise again.
    Your wife can climb a tree faster than your cat.
    The Salvation Army declines your mattress.
    You've been kicked out of the zoo for heckling monkeys.
    You pick your teeth from a catalog.
    You prefer car keys to Q-Tips.
    You bring a fishing pole to Sea World
    You use a rag for a gas cap.
    Your front porch collapses and kills five more dogs.
    You think a chain saw is a musical instrument.
    You can tell your age by counting the number of rings in the bathtub.
    The ASPCA raids your kitchen.
    You come home from the garbage dump with more stuff than you brought.


    I hope the adhesive sticks.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I've pointed this information out countless times to the fact-challenged Pee-Tardys; but in additon to being fact challenged, they have a comprehension problem as well. No matter how many times they're informed of southern political history, they are not able to understand that "conservative" and "liberal" are more apt terms to use in discussing Democrats, Dixiecrats, and Republicans.

    William Seward and Salmon Chase were not happy with Lincoln's nomination as the candidate for the new Republican Party. Why? They, and others, believed Lincoln was not liberal enough, that he wasn't as committed to the Abolitionist cause as they were. Seward and Chase were opposed to the conservative south's determination to keep slavery as an economic institution.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's the United States of America, 2014. Scratching my head in bewilderment.

    Time for a single malt scotch.

    Good news? There is tomorrow.

    Sad news. Nothing will have changed.

    Repeat the above.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Teddy Roosevelt was a Republican...until he wasn't.
    Robet LaFollette was a Republican....until he wasn't.

    Neither was very conservative....
    Progressive.....before that was a Liberal thing to be.

    I believe in drinking liberally.....but I have to be conservative with my money.....and progressive on my way home.


    I believe in trees more than men...... Trees know enough to leaf things as they should be....men only believe in chopping down trees.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I like trees. They stop soil erosion, they provide shade, they help make for breathtaking landscaped, and they are a perpetually renewing resource. Responsible forest management is critical.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The fourth state that Thurmond carried in 1948 was South Carolina, not North Carolina. We have our own shame to bear; NC repeatedly elected Jesse Helms to the U.S. Senate. Please do not revise history and saddle us with Strom Thurmond as well! Oh the horror, oh the shame!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I occasionally found Jesse humorous but not so funny that I could forgive his shrunken racist heart. The thought of bearing the burden of that equally ratty bastard Strom Thurmond makes my stomach turn. So please, do not give us Strom! We have Pat McCrory and he makes Jesse look like a piker by comparison.

      Delete
    2. Ladies, I apologize sincerely for this egregious oversight, and have taken efforts to correct it.

      Delete
  7. Just finished an article from the e-mail about how "Obama and the Liberals" were responsible for all the rioting and recommending a "Ferguson Survival kit" consisting of, you guessed it, the AR-15 rifle, stores of food and water and survival equipment ( all conveniently available from the author)

    Obama and the Liberals and this in an article rightly condemning the public for disregarding facts and promoting emotionalism on one side while agreeing with it on the other. I do recall predicting that all the smoke and shouting would benefit the NRA and gun sales and paranoid racists and white supremacists -- and do more to set back progress than anything else. Just want to go on record there with my QED.

    We we know how language is gotta change, but did we remember that along with it history, logic and many other things including responsibility, decency and the ability to tell shit from shinola is gotta change too. Nothing really means anything to more than one or two people at a time -- and sadly, that seems to include words like racism. How can we have a cause and anything like that dialog we keep talking about when everybody is speaking his own language? Liberal, racist, progressive, scrooby separatist, Italian irridentist, Zombie. What you fear is what you get, what you think you said is what we tell you you said and nothing means anything.

    Neither Carolina has to feel more shame than Georgia, in my opinion. I would cite George Wallace who has the third longest gubernatorial tenure in post-Constitutional U.S. history at 5,848 days. A sometimes Democrat, he reminds us that the term means nothing without the coordinates of time and place. Have we heard how Martin Luther King was a Republican? I rest my case. I hope he's keeping Strom and Jesse company in hell where survival kits don't work.

    But having just heard Charles Barkley say on CNN that we should be able to disagree without being called Uncle Toms or Racists and I think he's saying that we have to face that not everyone we make into heroes are heroes. That makes his the voice I've been waiting to hear.


    I'll let him speak for himself, but sorry Hillary; in 2016, I'm on the Barkley bandwagon. Thank you sir for your honesty and for restoring the faith in mankind I've had less than nothing of in recent times.

    You know in most elections, the tallest man usually wins -- I'm just sayin'

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I mean I hope WALLACE is in hell -- jeez, gimme a break here.

      Delete
    2. I learned quite a lesson about what a devilish little twelve-year old partisan I was the day after George Wallace was shot in the spring of 1972. This wasn't long after his failed run for the presidency. I was in Stockholm. The land of blonde, nice-looking people. The headline in the Swedish newspaper in the machine read something like, "George Wallace Fem Skötten." (George Wallace shot five times.)

      I actually rejoiced thinking that he had been killed. What a young and foolish bloke was I to hold a human life in so little regard. I mean, isn't that the same governor that Lynyrd Skynyrd loved so well?

      A few years ago the UCSD drama department put together an interesting play about the affectionate, secret relationship between Strom Thurmond and his mixed race daughter, Essie Mae Williams entitled The Haunting of Jim Crow. The play was commissioned as a celebration of the official demise of racial segregation that some of us thought was possible three years before all bets were off. It was in recognition of the strongest ever opponent of civil rights incredibly celebrating his 100th birthday as a sitting U.S. senator. The third point was the fifty year milestone since Brown vs the Board of Education. Apparently Thurmond had the ear of both justice Earl Warren and justice Hugo L. Black. Essie Mae Williams had patiently waited until his death in 2003 to announce to the world that he was her father. Fascinating stuff. Sometimes even cold-hearted, racist bastards have a human side.

      Maybe it's time for us to take up that mantle again today. We can move forward into a brighter future. The hateful right wing of today will quickly die away. We can reclaim that victory. Just don't give an inch to the haters.

      That play can be seen in reader's theatre here.

      Delete
    3. It's only one hour long. How many TV shows is that?

      Delete
    4. Very well said. I'm sure both Strom and George thought they were doing the right thing. We do too. There's a lesson there. Which of today's voices are teaching it?

      The comedian Chris Rock, who I think deserves more respect as a social commentator, points out that we now have the best white people we've ever had. If things are better it's because "white" people are better, I don't think it's the result of riots or arson or mindless slogans shouted in the street, yet to listen to some not only is racism worse, but it's so deeply rooted in our bones that even with a fanatical deconstruction of everything we say and do and feel, even on a primal level, it's hopeless. It's not class based or economic and no statistics need apply, it's just white racism and white racism alone.

      It isn't hopeless but to some institutions and "leaders" who would be irrelevant without something to shout about in the street it must be appealing to call it hopeless. Hate and all human nastiness is quite well distributed and when someone burns down a black church why should we be afraid of being called racist to mention it if the match wasn't lit by a light skinned hand? Yet we are and we're quick to haul out the "blame the victim" trope. Are there some of us who are afraid not to join the dance in the street for fear of being called racist? I was cynically called that for opposing Allen West, the war criminal, for Congress by Republicans and the Klan has been known to sing "we shall overcome"

      Since it's impossible to prove that one is not a racist, or communist or heretic or witch, it's a game stopper.

      All I'm suggesting is that we've caught ourselves in a trap where it seems impossible to make things better unless we follow the unseen leaders and their programs; unless we are seen as being furious and uncompromising and single minded puppets -- unless we keep insisting there has been no improvement, unless we keep insisting that we bypass due process and that there are no social problems or components to social ills other than racism.

      The trope du jour is that we're all denying that racism exists, particularly when we mention that it was much worse not long ago. We're denying it when we mention that Hispanics are being abused as much and others too. We're not, we're denying some people who want to coopt the struggle, control the facts and distort reason with rage.

      Delete
  8. The history of political leanings is a long and winding road which is why I have always and will always be a registered Independent. My vote goes where my brain determines it should go based on political platofrms and how they fit with my values.

    ReplyDelete

We welcome civil discourse from all people but express no obligation to allow contributors and readers to be trolled. Any comment that sinks to the level of bigotry, defamation, personal insults, off-topic rants, and profanity will be deleted without notice.