Tuesday, June 16, 2015

Tales of Turf-N-Serf: The Low-Down on Trickle-Down



(Notes from the cephalopod:  This post is revised and updated from an earlier article to reflect current
macroeconomic data.  I intend to repost this article before election day and every election cycle thereafter.
As always, your comments, feedback and suggestions for improvement are always welcome.)

Supply-side macroeconomics, also known as trickle-down economics, has dominated our national debate for the better part of 35 years.  In theory, proponents argue, high taxes and burdensome regulations raise the cost of  business and drag down the economy.  Once relieved of these burdens,  more products and services at lower prices will attract consumers and unleash the engines of economic growth; hence the term ‘supply-side.’

No empirical evidence supports this view. In practice, consumers do not spend money unless they have discretionary cash in their pockets, and suppliers have no incentive to raise output when consumers have no money to spend. Furthermore, lower prices do not always reach consumers when businesses choose profit-taking over investment. In the real world, wealth does not trickle down from the top. Rather, the middle classes create wealth from within when they are prosperous and upwardly mobile.

In the pseudo-mathematics of supply-side theory -- where subtraction equals addition -- the privileges of a few justify the impoverishment of the many. The dark side of supply-side is confirmed in these trends of the past 30 years:
Median incomes are 12 percent lower than a generation ago.  The marginal propensity to save has vanished as middle-class families struggle with rising costs.  Debt has nearly doubled; bankruptcies are up twofold.  The economy has become an inverted pyramid where billionaires are taxed at lower marginal rates than teachers, and a privileged business class has won a disproportionate share of new wealth.
The result is an inequality bubble unseen since the Gilded Age. By all accounts, supply-side is the modern analogue of a medieval master-serf relationship; yet, it gives political cover to legislators and paid lackeys who argue the case on behalf of their wealthy benefactors.  Not a word on the evening news, but we see it everyday in our communities.

Monday, Monday, can’t trust that day
Monday, Monday, sometimes it just turns out that way
Monday morning, you gave me no warning of what was to be
Oh, Monday, Monday, how could you leave and not take me?

For some reason, everyone in my neighborhood prefers to take off weekends and mow their lawns on Monday.  Why every Monday but not Tuesday, you ask?  Bizarre, I admit. Perhaps it just turns out that way.

Good lawnmowers make good neighbors.  We keep up appearances and keep peace in the neighborhood.  Witness this daily exchange every time neighbors meet at the mailbox:

“Good morning, Mr. Briggs. How are you today?”
“Mighty fine, Mr. Stratton. And yourself?”

We mow our lawns on Monday but not always in the same way.  Some of us cut grass in straight parallel lines, while others tend to meander or zigzag around our yards. Folks of different strokes are good as long as the grass is cut, and everyone knows:  Good lawnmowers make good neighbors.  We keep up appearances and keep peace in the neighborhood … until something strange happened one day.

Exactly how it happened or when it happened, no one knows for sure … but assuredly it happened.  Lampposts, Manhole Covers, and Utility Poles won the right to be treated as legal persons. Then they secured easements that granted them special rights and privileges.

You would think homeowners in the neighborhood would find common ground and unite in common cause.  Oh no!  The Lampposts -- in league with Manhole Covers and Utility Poles -- started a PR campaign that forewarned the homeowners on Magnolia Street to beware the residents of Hawthorn and Dogwood, who sneer at the folks on Elm and jeer the good citizens on Elder.

The Lampposts convinced the homeowners on Magnolia to love the neighborhood more than the neighbors who dwell on Hawthorn, Dogwood, Elm, or Elder – all of whom no longer look like, act like, or talk like real neighbors, they claim.

In short order, the Manhole Covers demanded a tax cut.  As Job Creators, they claimed, tax cuts for Manhole Covers means more jobs in the neighborhood (although no job that has ever fallen into an open manhole has ever been seen again).

Unfortunately, tax cuts for Manhole Covers has meant less revenue for our town. To close the budget gap, Utility Poles voted to cut services, lay off workers, and raise the consumption tax on lawnmowers. Cutting grass, they insist, no longer levels the playing field, and lawnmowers have no right to complain. Irate lawnmowers are waging class warfare on Lampposts and Manhole Covers, they explain.

Meanwhile, the Lampposts and Utility Poles say: “If senior citizens living on Elder lose their healthcare or pension benefits, they should consider themselves empowered.” To further humiliate the jobless, Manhole Covers claim unemployment benefits kill the incentive to work.

Legal but non-living persons now rule the neighborhood.  They never created a single job but reserve the right to trample on our bushes and shine flashlights into our bedroom windows at night.

Years ago, when a Lamppost burned out, a service truck came to the neighborhood and replaced a bulb. This year, the Lampposts say: “Buy your own bulb and replace it yourself.” Then they demand a bonus, a pay raise, and another tax cut. Last year, the Lampposts traded in their service truck for a Jaguar. This year, their Jaguar morphed into a Rolls Royce.

The situation has set homeowner against homeowner, and these non-living entities are ruining our community.  Today, you can hardly tell the difference between a Lamppost versus a real person anymore.

Meanwhile, the neighborhood mood has turned ugly.  Everywhere you see: Weeds taller than Utility Poles, crabgrass, hardship, and resentful neighbors no longer talking to neighbors. If there are lessons to be learned, forget the Lampposts, Manhole Covers, and Utility Poles.  Forget the polemics and dog whistles. How I yearn for the smell of fresh cut grass, E Pluribus Unum, and friendly neighbors exchanging friendly greetings at the mailbox again.

Monday morning couldn't guarantee
That Monday evening you’d still be here with me.

Reminder:  Tomorrow is Tuesday, the day we bring our trash to the curb.

12 comments:

  1. Bellum omnium contra omne, The war of all against all: lamp post against lamp post, dog eat dog, but the more dogs you eat, the more you become such a big dog the less you're likely to be eaten. Pretty soon you're a monopoly; too big to fail, too big to have to listen to anyone. It's a kind of primitivism, the "natural state" according to Hobbes.

    The big dogs would certainly like that but the miracle is that they have us all sitting up and begging for the opportunity for a very, very few to make it to the top in a rigged game.

    Too bad we're not much smarter than dogs, or at least there are so many that are not rational enough to achieve any kind of enlightenment or recognize their self interest. Too bad the big dogs are so good at the game, urging us to put the rent money in the slot machine and dream.

    It's not that Capitalism is evil or doesn't do a good job of providing a better life for more people, but we're asked to confuse it for a free for all, the primal struggle between an individual and the rest, "And the life of man solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." Promoting the monad, the autonomous individual free from restraint is just that condition Hobbes and thus the "society" he talks about is really what the Tea People are against, prreferring some pseudo-Crhistian normalizing force, which is the antithesis of a society that sets its own rules and is really only power dressed up in funny clothes.

    Sometimes I think or poor Dr. Moreau, trying to get his animals to walk upright. For are we not men?

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's not that Capitalism is evil or doesn't do a good job of providing a better life for more people, but we're asked to confuse it for a free for all, the primal struggle between an individual and the rest,...

    Capitalism is in actuality responsible for great growth , wealth, and prosperity. Thanks to capitalism the world became a better place, considered in total. Even Karl Marx understood it was the best system devised as of his time.

    The problem? IMV capitalism is suffering from what I call stunted growth syndrome. In other words it has failed to adapt to changing economies and societal evolution effectively. In the USA the party of business is most responsible.

    TOO little regulation and too little taxes is as bad as too much regulation and to high taxes. But, that's what we spend our time arguing over and it appears the former is winning thus far.

    We live in an ever more complex and rapidly changing world and far too many just can't keep up.

    We just took the trash out today. There will be more next Weds.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes, The party formerly known as the Party of Business. There is usually a saddle point between two limits that produces the best results but anyone looking for compromise, a middle ground, a point of maximum efficiency is a commie or a Fascist or a heretic. Pragmatism is the enemy of doctrines. Capitalism isn't a religion, isn't handed down in its perfection from above and you're right, in a world that's always changing we sometimes have to fight inertia and we have to fight the by products of fast change which leaves some disenfranchised, impoverished and hopeless enough to consider stupid things like Communism.

    Capitalism was at risk during the great Depression any yet the effort to bring enough consumers back into the system to drive demand was a battle. It still is for some reason I do not understand. Just my opinion but there's saddle point where enough people have enough discretionary income to make Capitalism thrive but a concentration of capital or wealth is only good for the yacht builders.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As recently as yesterday, I was in a furniture store when a salesman started railing against the evils of taxes and government regulations ... lamenting the flight of manufacturing from American shores. A gross misattribution, I thought, he ignored the impact of cheap wages on the price of commodities and goods sold. My point about this experience: The public has been so indoctrinated with repetitions of bogus bullshit, they accept it as gospel.

    Here is another point: You know there is a HUGE problem when Johann Rupert, the billionaire owner of Cartier, sounds this alarm:

    How is society going to cope with structural unemployment and the envy, hatred and the social warfare?,” he said. “We are destroying the middle classes at this stage and it will affect us.

    Johann Rupert is not the only one. The well-known commentator, Chris Hedges, has warned of revolution in the streets. Meanwhile, our news media allows fallacious talking points to go unchallenged. You cannot start a dialog on vital issues by looking for excuses to avoid it.

    Admittedly, the analogy of lawnmowers is a silly construct but all satire is silly. Nevertheless, it gets a few points across: How supply-side impacts people locally; why people do not vote their pocketbooks; how dog whistle politics divides an electorate by creating suspicion and derision; how a privileged class distorts our economy and our system of government; and how to get these points across without pushing partisan buttons.

    No, I don't expect miracles, nor do I believe this treatment will convince hardcore supply-siders; but the goal is to start a conversation. Economics will dominate the debate in next year's election cycle. It has already started.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I fear any real conversation has no chance of getting started. Once it attracts the public's attention it's so easily drowned out and diverted. The science of delusion and opinion manipulation is so advanced and the media, whose function is to expose and investigate are no more than whores seeking only financial gain -- which brings me back to the nature of Capitalism. Public good is only a side effect, IMO and that side effect fades away when profitability is the only virtue. I'[m convinced that when the point of maximum profitability is reached, the number and kind of choices to the consumer reach a minimum. When enough capital can enable its owner to manipulate the system, Capitalism and Capitalists become independent of the system and its checks and balances evaporate and the invisible hand serves only to give us the finger. Why make a better product when it's cheaper to make a poor one seem the best? Why bother to create a better, more responsive government when it's cheaper and more profitable to lie, cheat and steal while the people applaud and vote for more? The "information age" has been more of a boon for con men than for anyone else because "net Neutrality" can't exist if the rich can flood us with murderously effective propaganda more easily than any of us can refute it.

      Delete
    2. That's why I keep fighting the good fight: Our regressive economy has turned into an oppressive economy.

      Delete
  5. I had a conversation this morning with my barber on the Trump phenomenon. Like many he thinks Trump is not a serious candidate. He also thinks Trump's purpose for announcing is to force the media to focus attention on issues on the minds of many of us. Not a politician Trump doesn't give a damn about PC and if he is on the debate stage he'll force issues that otherwise may be ignored.

    Anyway that's his take and it caused me to think on it. He may be right.If he is his it does not work in the republicans favor. Trump remember has contributed heavily to democratic candidates, as well as the Clinton Foundation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think Trump is the grift that keeps giving (and vice versa).

      Delete
  6. I appreciated candidates like Ross Perot and Ron Paul for that reason: bringing up really important subjects that the other candidates adeptly avoided. Our election process is a circus and our "debates" don't even rise to that level. I would love to get a barber's opinion on what the hell that is on Trump's head though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The finest and most ridiculous comb over ever on display.

      Delete
  7. I love when I get a couple of minutes to hang out here with you guys. I always get such an education. The Republicans, if they gain the White House will totally screw this up. Their policies are rampant in NC where they have taken over the governorship and the state legislature. They are slamming through so many bad bills designed to marginalize and oppress the very people who idiotically voted them into office. They vote them in and then have a cow when fracking is pushed through, they lose their minds when Raleigh cuts spending to education and other services they use and did not realize were on the firing line. Gov. Rat Boy has vetoes a couple of unpopular bills, knowing the legislature would override. And all he talks about is strengthening our economy and creating jobs, none of which has materialized. Less is not always more, if you do not have a solid infrastructure and generous perks, you will not attract new business. Let's level the playing field by going to a national sales tax and eliminating the IRS, tax shelters, etc. You want to spend, you pay. If you save you are rewarded. Set a tax structure for businesses when they buy materials or whatever needs to be done with intellectual businesses. There is a way to structure a national tax that will be far less burdensome to the American taxpayer. Term limits in Congress to diminish the effects of corruption and graft. Let's ask every able bodied American to donate a couple of hours a month to a charity or rescue group. Walk dogs, serve in a soup kitchen, clean up a park. We have forgotten the connected community known by our ancestors where everyone just pitched in where needed and then minded their own business. Alma and Henry did not endlessly discuss Mabel's vagina and what she should do with it. Those two gentleman sharing a house were not discussed at the dinner table, religion was confined to home and church. We have regressed to unbridled barbarianism, bent on mindless destruction of everything sane and sacred. The Morlocs are here.

    ReplyDelete
  8. And eating us alive, as Morlocks do. I want a time machine MOW!

    It's over. I read this morning about the billions and billions Walmart has stashed away in Europe and with the cooperation of the Democrats the Treasure is making it impossible for retired school teachers in Mexico to have a bank account lest they avoid ten bucks in taxes. If I did what Walmart and Halliburtond inter alia do, I'ld lose everything I own and spend the rest of my life in jail.

    The rich make their own laws and elect our representatives to fleece us and ignore us. This is the 800th anniversary of the Magna Carta. Can we stand up to the powers of today and demand anything? Hell no and now we can't even escape to another country unless we want to live off the land without money.

    ReplyDelete

We welcome civil discourse from all people but express no obligation to allow contributors and readers to be trolled. Any comment that sinks to the level of bigotry, defamation, personal insults, off-topic rants, and profanity will be deleted without notice.