Thursday, July 9, 2015

Failure at the Bully Pulpit

On Wednesday, Medea Benjamin of Code Pink confronted Lindsey Graham at a press conference, and really didn't do a particularly good job.
Benjamin was supposed to be asking the Republican presidential candidate a question, but instead held onto the microphone for more than two minutes before security escorted her out of the room. While she still had the floor, Benjamin implored Graham to speak out against beheadings in Saudi Arabia and the Israel’s “repression” of the Palestinians, among other issues.
Graham had a chance to respond appropriately, and instead he chose to flounder.
“Is there a question?” an uncomfortable-looking Tapper asked as Graham chuckled to himself and rubbed his eyes.

“I’m going to put her down as undecided,” Graham joked after Benjamin’s mic had been taken away. While he said he respected her right to express her opinion, the senator said, “I couldn’t disagree with you more.”

“I think people like you make the world incredibly dangerous,” he continued. “I think people like you are radical Islam’s best hope.” He argued that the Iraq War did not create ISIS just as American intervention did not set the stage of 9/11. “You’re not going to fool me that somehow we brought this upon ourselves,” he said.
So, apparently, despite being a US Senator, Graham is either willfully ignorant or a liar. (I'm willing to say "both," but perhaps I'm too forgiving.)

OK, let's go through this quick: in the 80s, the CIA funneled money to train fighters in Afghanistan. One of those fighters was the son of a rich architect, a guy named Osama bin Laden who would go on later to create a little social club called Al Qaeda. So, already we see where American intervention over there didn't do us much good.

Then we went into Iraq and started blowing shit up. People lost their homes, their families and their hope. And like many hopeless people through history, they turned to religion.

On top of that, we left former Iraqi soldiers and former Al Qaeda operatives with no jobs, and since all of their training was in the area of "urban destruction," and they suddenly had plenty of time on their hands, they needed a hobby as well. So, Lindsey, that was how we helped create ISIS. Simple, right?

But both Lindsey and Benjamin held the national stage for a moment and neither one used it appropriately. Benjamin came to the Atlantic Council knowing that Graham would be there, and had plenty of time to prepare. She could have asked him a question that he could have been forced to respond to in some way.

For instance, "Senator Graham, you supported the invasion of Iraq. You consistently support our relations with Saudi Arabia, a repressive regime where most of the 9/11 terrorists came from. You have been consistently wrong in every way in dealings with the Middle East. Why do you think we should listen to you now, and especially why do you think we should put you in the White House?"

Instead she chose to do what CODE PINK does most of the time and just disrupt the proceedings with some incoherent rambling and unfocused anger.

Lindsey could have found a way to respond graciously, or could have begun discussing Middle Eastern policy. Instead, he make a lame joke and tried to dismiss with non sequiturs and lies.
“I think people like you are radical Islam’s best hope.”
How is that, Senator? Because she chose to exercise her right to free speech (even if she didn't do it well)?

Lindsey Graham showed that, at his best he would probably be an ineffective president; at his worst, he would most likely be that most dreaded of all natural disasters, a third Bush term. Medea Benjamin and Lindsey Graham met Wednesday night. But they were both prisoners of their own ideology.

10 comments:

  1. I think he's an also-ran. But I was very wrong about the traction Trump would get...

    Curious about the quotes around repression in: Israel’s “repression” of the Palestinians

    Is that from Nameless Cynic, or something the Cynic quoted?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That was how Mediaite chose to punctuate it. (Link's up there around the first two words, I think) I mean, I happen to agree with both sides on that - Israel IS repressing the Palestinians, but it's a defensive action on their part. I don't see where either side comes out well on the subject.

      That's just me, though.

      Delete
  2. The prospect of Graham as president is too horrifying to discuss much less to find something mordantly cynical to say in jest, I don't think he could survive the primaries, but in this country where his limitations are seen as a virtue, I have no faith. Perhaps "the South" smarting from the latest smackdown will get behind some Gentleman Idiot like Graham, but really I don't want to think about it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Graham has little to no chance of getting the GOP nod, much less the presidency.

    But he, like Cruz, Huckabee, Carson, Santorum,
    and Trump to names a few, certainly gives one
    the shivers.

    Trump is getting most of the attention and
    press these days. Who knows how long it will last before he flames out. The real concern is what if he doesn't.

    Shuddering. ..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At this time, I think a Trump presidency would actually be worse than an HRC presidency. And that makes him bloody awful in my book. His language about Mexicans is like something out of a Klan rally.

      Delete
    2. Trump is a zero who had his money and opportunities handed to him, so he likes to dump on the less fortunate to make it seem like he really earned it all. I sometimes think guys like him are encouraged to campaign so that Jeb will be a shoe in with no other sane choices. Democracy is supposed to be about having choices - right?

      Delete
  4. I'm sure the GOP isn't depraved enough to let that happen, otherwise we might as well let Hillary start moving in today. On the other hand, I'm getting sporting goods catalogs running sales on Confederate Flag merchandise.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I saw someone in town recently put up the Confederate flag in front of their house, flying level and side by side with the US flag.

      I'm thinking this is actually a violation of the US flag code maybe?

      Delete
    2. AI think you're right, but when you're trying to pretend you're a "rebel" a rogue, maverick, renegade why bother with the Flag Code? Everybody's a rebel and the more they indulge in following the crowd, the more like a rebel they feel. Idiots.

      I wish more was made out of the fact that this is a flag of open and armed rebellion against the legitimate government of the United States and is a gross insult to the flag they pledge allegiance to and fly on the same pole. It should have been declared illegal in 1865. Now it just lets the idiots think they actually didn't lose.

      Delete
  5. "incoherent rambling and unfocused anger"

    Code Pinks doesn't speak well of us or for us. How embarrassing!

    ReplyDelete

We welcome civil discourse from all people but express no obligation to allow contributors and readers to be trolled. Any comment that sinks to the level of bigotry, defamation, personal insults, off-topic rants, and profanity will be deleted without notice.