Wednesday, July 22, 2009

perspective please.

Here we go again. Some group called the Violence Policy Center has released statistics showing that in a 23 month period 44 US residents were killed by people legally carrying concealed weapons and therefore "the violence" is too much to bear and we must ban the practice of allowing private citizens to bear weapons. Perhaps my math is faulty but I think in a country of 300 million people, this translates to a 0.0000075% chance of being shot and killed in any given year by someone with a legal concealed weapon permit. That's quite a bit less likely than an innocent person being killed by the police either as a victim or a bystander and it suggests that private permit holders have a safer record than the police.

No figures were given with regard to the number of lives saved by legally owned guns, but in my small county of 130,000 people several have been this year so far by thwarting home invasions, and of course shooting deaths in Florida have declined steadily since the State started issuing licenses and instituted the "castle doctrine." Overall, shooting deaths have declined over the decades and that includes shootings of police officers in the line of duty. Yet the beat and the myth of escalating violence go on.

I don't feel like doing all the work, but I'd like to see how many people die in ER waiting rooms every year because they can't get insurance. I'd like to see how many people are shot by drug gangs and more than anything I'd like to see how many innocent people are shot by the police. I'm willing to bet that more people are killed by MADD members driving SUVs while talking on the phone.

Of course the Flu claims about 36,000 lives every year and cars even more. Cigarettes and alcohol? Well, you know. More people are killed every year by lightening in Florida alone and we're not closing the golf courses in a hysterical panic.

At the risk of being called a "gun nut" I take a vastly higher risk of dying or of killing someone else every time I take the boat out -- or the car for that matter and I have to conclude that our friends at the Violence Policy Center are proceeding from the conclusion that guns are so frightening to them that the right to self defense against violent criminals is washed away by their phobia and so they must grasp at these self contradictory arguments and fallacious conclusions like a drowning man at straws.

Yes, yes, the NRA -- the Gun Lobby. Everything including the ancient right to self defense is the fault of "the gun lobby." Forget not that that worn out straw/bogey man only exists because people are tired of being forced to accede to other people's phobias and it has such clout because it has so many individual, dues paying members. Much more of this twaddle and they'll have one more.

7 comments:

  1. I agree. In fact, i think it would be the worse thing to ban guns.

    Because then only criminals and cops would have them. And there aren't enough police to protect everyone all the time.

    If criminals knew people might have concealed weapons, they may hesitate to go in there. But if they know no one but them has a gun, they will have less fear.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am quite ready to believe that gun enthusiasts are not related to crime problems in the United States. Talking to people at gun shows, I get the same sort of geek-vibe that comes from a sci-fi convention. Substitute the finer points of AK-47 models for the various incarnations of phasers on Star Trek and you'll get an idea of the conversations you can overhear. To these people, guns are culture.

    That said, our problem with gun violence starts with loopholes and lax regulations that allow too many guns into "the wrong hands" (to use a hackneyed phrase). Those "wrong hands" are the ones who see a gun as empowerment to break moral codes. The "gun culture" of Chicago, then, is very different from the gun culture of Alabama. Which is why I am glad to see the Senate NOT pass legislation to make CCW laws "one size fits all." When it comes to gun culture, one size definitely DOES NOT fit all.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Some great comments here, and I agree with you all. I don't think that I would ever hear myself say that here! j/k :-)

    I think a ban on guns would be the height of stupidity. Criminals will have no problem getting them but the citizens that want to protect themselves won't have access.

    I do think that there should be restrictions and that it should be on a state to state basis.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I do have issues with the fact that kids get guns and then go on killing rampages at schools or distraught people go off and kill their family members...

    But I realize that stupid people will do stupid things and they do not necessarily need guns to do the stupid things they do...

    I do believe we have a glut of guns and we need to come to grips with so many guns in all the wrong hands but with globalization there will always be a ready supply of guns someplace so the present situation will never change...

    ReplyDelete
  5. It's still more likely you'll be killed by lightening than in a school shooting, but having a license to carry hardly makes it more likely that your kid will steal your gun.

    Personally I wouldn't have a gun in my house if I had kids, but cops do and their kids aren't stealing them to any measurable extent.

    For what it's worth, having a carry permit means the sheriff knows what I own, has a copy of my fingerprints and so does the FBI. It's not the sort of thing I would do if had any intention of criminal activities.

    It's self evident that crimes are committed by people with illegal guns and the illegality of the gun is no more a hindrance than the illegality of the crime. I think it's delusional to think that writing more and more overlapping and confusing gun laws will have the slightest effect on crime - it never has.

    I sometimes think that the climate of fear and dread the anti-gun people promote has a lot to do with why some people buy guns in the first place. You'll never hear MADD admit that drunk driving is on the decline or the Brady group admit that gun crime is on the decline and has declined most in the places with the most permissive gun laws.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Free 9mm hollow point between the eyes for people who try to peddle their shit here!

    ReplyDelete

We welcome civil discourse from all people but express no obligation to allow contributors and readers to be trolled. Any comment that sinks to the level of bigotry, defamation, personal insults, off-topic rants, and profanity will be deleted without notice.