Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Judge rules against deep water drilling moratorium

Why does this not surprise me?

Today a federal judge in New Orleans blocked a six-month moratorium on deep-water drilling that the Obama administration had ordered after the Gulf of Mexico oil spill.

In a 22-page ruling, Judge Martin L. C. Feldman of Federal District Court issued a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of a May 28 order halting all floating offshore drilling projects in more than 500 feet of water and preventing the government from issuing new permits for such projects.

Citing the economic harm to businesses and workers in the gulf caused by the moratorium, Judge Feldman — a 1983 appointee of President Ronald Reagan — wrote that the Obama administration had failed to justify the need for the sweeping suspension, which he characterized as “generic, indeed punitive.”

He wrote that “the blanket moratorium, with no parameters, seems to assume that because one rig failed and although no one yet fully knows why, all companies and rigs drilling new wells over 500 feet also universally present an imminent danger.”

The White House immediately responded by saying that it would appeal the decision.

Good. But what hope is there with the current and seemingly currupt Supreme Court?

The Obama administration had argued that a six-month suspension of deepwater drilling was necessary so that the government could complete its investigation of the Deepwater Horizon accident, and make sure that other drilling operations on the outer continental shelf were safe.

But the order was challenged by a coalition of businesses that provide services and equipment to offshore drilling platforms. The companies sued, asking the judge to declare the moratorium to be invalid and arguing that there was no evidence that existing operations were unsafe.

If I remember correctly, there was no evidence the Deepwater Horizon drill was unsafe either - until it exploded killing 11 workers and  spewing anywhere from 67 million to 127 million gallons of oil into the Gulf.

I'm sure businesses that rely on oil companies to stay afloat are deeply concerned about the welfare of the residents, wildlife and environment in the area. Do I hear the echo of BP in the background?

The State of Louisiana filed a brief supporting the lawsuit, arguing that the moratorium would damage its economy.

I can appreciate the concern of Gulf Coast residents for their livelihood and I wouldn't want to be in their shoes - not for a day, not for a minute. But sometimes short-term sacrifices have to be made to ensure that the future will provide a safer and more secure life style.

Catherine Wannamaker, a lawyer for environmental groups that intervened in the case and supported the moratorium, called the ruling "a step in the wrong direction."

"We think it overlooks the ongoing harm in the Gulf, the devastation it has had on people's lives," she said. "The harm at issue with the Deepwater Horizon spill is bigger than just the Louisiana economy. It affects all of the Gulf."

UPDATE FROM MOTHER JONES: According to the most recently available financial disclosure form for US District Court Judge Martin Feldman, he had holdings of up to $15,000 in Transocean in 2008. He has also recently owned stock in offshore drilling or oilfield service providers Halliburton, Prospect Energy, Hercules Offshore, Parker Drilling Co., and ATP Oil & Gas

5 comments:

  1. Since the Arab oil embargo of 1973, our country has been dithering with energy reform to the point of paralysis. One would think the worst environmental catastrophe in history would finally bring citizens to their senses. Perhaps that Eureka moment that says: "This time, lets get it right." Nooo!

    Same old special interests. Same old hand-wringing politicians. Same old short-term, parochial concerns. Same old lack of unity. Same old bullshit and stupidity.

    Now we learn the judge in the case had fundamental conflicts of interest and refused to recuse himself. There are reasons why I quit the human species. Anyone care to join me?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Only if you find a nice cozy cave with gas and electricity. ; )

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ahh, but tnlib, when lie at the bottom of the reef surrounded by friends and anemones and bask in warm tropical waters, you have no need of gas and electricity.

    From your coral-lined hideaways, you watch all of creation float overhead ... clown fish, snarks and sharks, wahoo, Johnny Mantas, Ike and Tina Tuna, and all ... and then you see a small oval object directly above (the hull of Captain Fogg's boat, no doubt, with old blog posts about tea baggers, Glenn Beck, Flushed Dumbaughs, and bottles of petite Sarah tossed overboard), you say to yourself: "I want my ocean back!"

    ReplyDelete
  4. The trash can on deck has it's own compartment and upon the door to that compartment is a placard listing all the things one may not throw overboard and all the awful things that will happen to those who do. (unless of course I were a corporation and punishing me would be Communism)

    I'd hardly dare toss anything really, but especially not those gems of insight and wisdom as have appeared here and elsewhere. What would the swine of the world do without such pearls? The ocean has pearls enough of it's own anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Welcome home, Captain. Of course, I was just teasing (rarely missing any opportunity), and I do like those pearls, you know.

    ReplyDelete

We welcome civil discourse from all people but express no obligation to allow contributors and readers to be trolled. Any comment that sinks to the level of bigotry, defamation, personal insults, off-topic rants, and profanity will be deleted without notice.