Thursday, September 2, 2010

Sarah Palin: No Laughing Matter

Of the Obama administration, she says, “They talk down to us. Especially here in the heartland. Oh, man. They think that, if we were just smart enough, we’d be able to understand their policies. And I so want to tell ’em, and I do tell ’em, Oh, we’re plenty smart, oh yeah—we know what’s goin’ on. And we don’t like what’s goin’ on. And we’re not gonna let them tell us to sit down and shut up.” The crowd’s ample applause at these lines swells to something vastly bigger when Palin vows defiantly that “come November, we’re taking our country back!”

The above lines are from an article by author Michael Joseph Gross for Vanity Fair. Gross followed Sarah Palin "...through through four midwestern states, speaking with whomever I could induce to talk under whatever conditions of anonymity they imposed—political strategists, longtime Palin friends and political associates, hotel staff, shopkeepers and hairstylists, and high-school friends of the Palin children. There’s a long and detailed version of what they had to say, but there’s also a short and simple one: anywhere you peel back the skin of Sarah Palin’s life, a sad and moldering strangeness lies beneath."


I just read Gross' article. It's long, but well worth taking the time to peruse.

A lot of us, myself included, have been guilty of dismissing Sarah Palin. We laugh at her gaffes, marvel at the way that she mangles the English language, and deride her for her lack of knowledge on most topics of substance. But here's the deal, Sarah Palin is a very dangerous woman and if we are to neutralize her, the first thing that we have to do is take her seriously.

While we're making fun of Palin, she's methodically increasing her base, travelling through middle America, trash talking the Obama administration, and regularly invoking the name of Jesus. Her base doesn't think that she's stupid; they think that she's one of them, and when you insult her, you insult them.

I'm guilty of it, as are most progressives. The provincial and narrow view of the world expressed by Palin's followers offends me and I express my distaste by asserting that they are devoid of intellectual curiosity, which is just another way for stating that they're stupid. Once you tell people that they're dumb, they just aren't interested in hearing anything else that you have to say.

However, Palin has successfully tapped into the psyche of a lot of Americans, people who identify with her because they buy her assertions that she is one of them. She makes them feel that their view of the world is valid, that their prejudices and narrow belief systems are superior to those of the heathen liberals. Early on she recognized that Obama represents everything that they fear and dislike. When he speaks, they don't always easily follow what he is talking about so they presume that he's speaking some anti-American, anti-Christian code. Palin feeds their fire; she's their leader.

Perhaps Palin's most clever move is the focus on generating the tent revival atmosphere demonstrated at Beck's Restoring Honor rally. Palin has two texts that she regularly cites at her appearances, the Constitution of the United States and the Christian Bible, sometimes interchangeably. Her audiences eat the mishmash of secular law and religious belief as if it were the mythical manna from heaven, secure in their desire to get their country back and the belief that God wants them to have it.

I don't believe Christianity is inherently evil but I do believe that humankind has repeatedly demonstrated our ability to twist the precepts of any belief system to justify the worst aspects of our nature. Misdirected religious fervor soon swells into fanaticism, and history is littered with the horrors perpetrated in the name of religious fanaticism. These people believe that they're on a mission from God and that Palin is their angel of light guiding them to salvation, not just for themselves, but for the entire country. If they have to trample on the Constitution, run undocumented immigrants out of the country by any means necessary, and kill off the liberals in order to enact their vision and get their country back, then so be it.

The saving grace of this country has been that most people who consider themselves to be Christians have never been overly involved in organized proselytizing. There have always been exceptions, but not any significant numbers involved in forcing the word of God on all, just a few souls wandering through neighborhoods and knocking on doors on occasion. However, the Palin/Beck base are a different and dangerous breed, and they have found their prophets in Palin and her acolyte, Glenn Beck.

They are fueled by their fear and discontent; Palin and Beck provide them with answers that fit their view that they have been wronged and that their entire way of life is danger of being destroyed. Every time they hear someone speaking Spanish they fear that the conversation is about them. They deeply resent being unable to understand the conversation, after all, this is their country. So they angrily question, "Why can't these people learn English?" They also provide the answer, "They don't want to learn English!"

The black man in the oval office further confuses and upsets them. He must be up to something nefarious; he can't really be working for the good of all Americans. At the core of the obsession with so-called reverse racism is a subconscious belief that black people must have some desire for retribution. That belief fuels the vitriolic dislike expressed for President Obama and the obsessive beliefs that he is on the side of the terrorists, has plans to destroy the United States, and plans to chuck the Constitution and replace it with a socialist manifesto.

I vehemently disliked most of the policies of the George W. Bush's administration but I can't recall there ever being an assessment by progressives that GWB was intentionally and with malice aforethought attempting to destroy the country. Certainly, there have been accusations that certain actions on the part of past presidents would result in the destruction of the foundational beliefs of this country but never the assertion that the president in question ran for office for the express purpose of destroying America.

At the top of the progressive agenda must be plans to reframe our message to re-engage liberals and progressives prior to the November 2010 elections and to begin to lay the foundation for the 2012 elections. I'm not confident that there is any framing that will sway those who are enraptured of Palin and Beck, and I fear that the Palin/Beck base will continue to grow.

There is a great deal of apathy among progressives and liberals; declarations that Obama has betrayed us abound. Like a petulant child who didn't get everything on his or her Christmas list, far too many of us focus on what remains undone and look past all that has been accomplished. We threaten not to vote in order to teach the Democrats not to take us for granted.

It's time that we start taking Sarah Palin seriously; her base certainly does. If we don't, there may lessons learned in November 2010 and 2012 but we may the ones who are schooled.

16 comments:

  1. I'm glad your taking her as the threat she is. I have to say for quite a while now, we have ignored the so called crazy's. We figured, if we pay no attention they would just go away. That was a big mistake. It's a political War out there and their winning. They have a juggernaut of Media hype. We have Blogs. MSM is just about worthless as the kowtow to Fox. It's not the first time we have been underdogs.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sheria,
    I stayed up way too late last night reading the Vanity Fair articles. I fear the same things in Palin that I fear in Beck--namely,that she's not and has never been like her audience and that she is backed by alarmingly rich and powerful puppet masters. She's the disturbed and disturbing spokesmodel for Koch products, a charismatic fanatic driven to either succeed or burn up in the effort.

    She believes she is a Chosen One.
    "Prayer warriors" are encouraged to rev up the angels who protect her from evildoers, to pray a firewall around her that guarantees her victory--this is not metaphor or hyperbole; this is her reality! YOU are among the evil ones she battles.

    In her worldview, I see the perfect counterpoint to radical, fanatical Islam. Her's is a black and white world. Her's is an anti-intellectualism that perfectly represents a culture designed by the ad-men, dumbed-down by reality television, and defined by junk-thought.

    Her followers are not stupid; they are rabble-roused.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Sarah Palin is a very dangerous woman"

    She's a clever politician - I believe even Obama has said that at least once.
    But she's not an intelligent person in the sense of understanding the world or what goes on it... and this is the essence of a dangerous politician, a combination of power to manipulate and total lack of ability to comprehend.

    I said all along that you don't want her to run... because you don't gamble with total catastrophe just for the entertainment of how crap she'd be.

    "I don't believe Christianity is inherently evil"

    Neither do I, and - unlike a lot of bloggers I otherwise agree with - I also believe overly aggressive anti-religiosity is counter-productive.
    And before it gets forgotten... Obama IS a Christian.

    Yes he is.

    Really.

    I'm not.

    He is.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Her base doesn't think that she's stupid; they think that she's one of them, and when you insult her, you insult them."

    I think the intelligence of your post insults them sufficiently.
    That's amply illustrated by the pile up of comments that will not be appearing in print here; comments from people who can't quite read the conditions set forth rather clearly.

    I use the world pile deliberately, because of the emphasis on fecal matters contained therein. Sometimes you visit the monkey house, sometimes the monkey house visits you but you can't ever argue with monkeys.

    One of the things that annoys people the most is the impression, true or false, that anyone looks down on them, feels more or actually is more intelligent. The mere possibility of there being a superior viewpoint is enough to call them to arms, even if it mostly manifests itself in anonymous dung flinging and idiot rage.

    Yes, I think she's even more dangerous than Beck because she's more charismatic and less concerned with making a buck than with rising to power.

    There is indeed a tide in the affairs of men and what men and women have ridden it simply because they float.

    I have to respond to one commenter here though and that is to warn against confusing disbelief in the supernatural with somehow being the enemy of those who do believe. It's a response disturbingly similar to the defensiveness of Palin supporters.

    No, I don't think Christianity or Islam or most any other religion is intrinsically evil, but I think people are and for those who are, religion tends to be less capable of changing them than the the application of crystals or spells or ritual chants. people make what they will of religion and always have done so, just as they make what they will with reality. What Sarah will make of it is a weapon to destroy democracy.

    I think virtually all of us have to chuckle at the idea that Palin isn't stupid if you define it in terms of IQ and I say that knowing I may be the least of this group. Still it isn't her stupidity that's frightening, but her ability to rally the genetic detritus of our species, charge and focus their anger and use it as a weapon.

    For me, it's the matter of fact way she refers to witches and being 'saved' by a witch hunter as though she was describing a visit to the 7/11 to buy a six pack. That's not religion, it's dementia.

    ReplyDelete
  5. As I read your post and the accompanying articles, I am struck by the strange parallels between Palin and Adolf Hitler.
    Hitler wasn't particularly intelligent and he made mistakes along the way but he learned how to manipulate and incite the "low information" masses. At the time Germany was in deep economic despair and the people were looking for something or someone to focus their anger and frustration - Hitler gave them the Jews and was able to enact horrible tortures and genocide with the peoples' support.
    Most people think something this horrible and extreme couldn't ever happen again but I disagree.
    Beck and Palin are probably the most dangerous of the extreme rightwingnuttery and it would be a huge mistake for us to simply dismiss them.
    In fact, we had better find our own warrior - my money would be on Alan Grayson - to refute and diffuse this runaway train before it is too late. November is upon us and 2012 is just around the corner.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I actually think Beck and Palin are laughable...they are so absurd that I laugh so hard I cry...

    I cry because they are more creatures created by the times than they are creatures who have created the times.

    To me, I wonder what is so wrong with our political system that creatures like this can be created?

    What is missing in our political system that these two end up representing a very powerful force in our political system?

    ReplyDelete
  7. "I am struck by the strange parallels between Palin and Adolf Hitler."

    Me too, but I'm tired of having that turkey Godwin thrown at me.

    "What is missing in our political system that these two end up representing a very powerful force in our political system?"

    Is it about what's missing or what's there? Have we ever had such a concerted effort to keep people misinformed and stirred up? When the media was held responsible to the public, we couldn't have had this, I don't think, but now they're responsible to no one and there is no downside to lying, libeling and fomenting insurrection for profit.

    ReplyDelete
  8. For me the parallels between Palin and Ronnie Reagan are what stand out.

    Take one attractive, none too bright, personable and highly motivated lump of clay and mold it into whatever shape you want.

    Lest we forget one of Ronnie's key contribution to politics as practiced in the mid 20th century and further refined even as we speak is the commodification of the public sector.

    At the end of the day it's just soap.

    ReplyDelete
  9. That's amply illustrated by the pile up of comments that will not be appearing in print here; comments from people who can't quite read the conditions set forth rather clearly.

    LOL! Disturbed some folks, did I? Must be doing something right.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Capt Fogg,
    If you were speaking of this statement, ""Prayer warriors" are encouraged to rev up the angels who protect her from evildoers, to pray a firewall around her that guarantees her victory--this is not metaphor or hyperbole; this is her reality! YOU are among the evil ones she battles,"
    I WAS framing that from Sarah's point of view--that she views anyone who disagrees with her or is critical of her as an enemy and an evildoer, therefore Sheria would be seen by her as an enemy. That's the extent of Palin's self-righteous, polarized world view.

    ReplyDelete
  11. "...therefore Sheria would be seen by her as an enemy."

    Dear Nance, that's one of the nicest things that anyone has ever said about me. SP sees me as her enemy! ;o

    ReplyDelete
  12. "However, Palin has successfully tapped into the psyche of a lot of Americans, people who identify with her because they buy her assertions that she is one of them..."

    What is discouraging about the above is that the people who identify with her have no understanding that she isn't one of them--economically. She's of the privileged classes--the elite--that they detest: the Hollywood types, the rich and famous.

    But Sheria is so correct in that it matters not a whit, so long as she affirms their fears and prejudices while at the same time invoking the name of their version of Jesus.

    I agree with the good Capt., she isn't intellectually smart--she's actually intellectually lazy--according to the VF article, she didn't know who Margaret Thatcher was. But intelligence and nuance were never admired by her crowd, and that is why she is such a force in Rightwing extremism.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Oh dear, the Palinator is back. Ironic when I think about it. The self-appointed defender of Supply Side Economics has spent half her adult life trickling down on pregnancy test strips. But I am being a smug and sarcastic liberal, the kind her kind hates.

    What an amazing article you have written, Sheria. Impressive! If I offer a contrarians’ viewpoint, it is not in disagreement but merely an attempt to explore something we may have overlooked.

    Sometimes I approach our body politic as if it were a client on the couch suffering mood swings from a kind of social distress disorder. There are times when the public mood is down, and times when the public mood is up. I admit, there has always been a McCarthy streak in American politics, but McCarthyism is also an expression of the public mood – it comes out in times of fear and results in irrational behavior, then subsides.

    In clinical terms, anger and depression are two sides of the same coin; when anger is bottled up inside, the result is depression. In political terms, an economic recession leaves people feeling that their lives are out of control, and their impulse is to lash out in anger (to externalize the depression of what they feel inside) and find a scapegoat to blame. To ignore their reality is to deny them the validation that they seek. Beck and Palin validate them. When liberals dismiss them as irrational or stupid, our unwillingness to validate them earns their rancor.

    Here is another irony. The right wing stink tanks … Cato, Heritage Foundation, AEI, and their sponsors, David Koch and the Walton family… have done their homework. They know how to swing the public mood when times are tough and bring the malcontents into their fold. As a consequence, we sit back utterly stupefied at how tea baggers can embrace an ideology so inimical to their self-interest. Astrofurf the bumpkins, that is how Koch and company co-opt them while we ignore them.

    We lose every time because we look down our long noses, when we should be challenging people to think about their options. By default, we end up scrounging for votes among our party faithful. We should be winning this argument, not bungling it.

    Of course, it is too late for this election cycle. The messages were firmly imprinted long ago, but I think we should consider other strategies in the future since we have few at the moment.

    (And folks make fun of me for trying to engage the bumpkins in dialogue.)

    ReplyDelete
  14. Excellent post, Sheria.

    From the very beginning of Palin's rise to national fame in the late summer of 2008, I had the uneasy feeling that when we deride and try to ignore her, we do so at our own peril.

    Say what you want about her -- and oh, yes, there is plenty to say, and I've done it myself numerous times -- she is a force (of destruction) to be reckoned with and she is here to stay -- and, unfortunately, she'll only get stronger.

    Rocky, Godwin's law or not, your impression (on similarities between Palin and Hitler in the popular reception of both) is right on target, IMO.

    An intellectually empty vessel with tons of personal ambition, Palin is plenty smart and opportunistic to see "a God's opening" (or whatever she called it once) for herself in the American political life, but not smart enough to realize that she's being used and manipulated by forces larger than herself for their benefit. Not that it matters to her, because she satisfies her goals in the process as well.

    She and Beck may seem like harmless clowns, but I'd say they are far from it.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Well as long as we've let him out of the bag, yes, Hitler was written off as a harmless clown who could be useful in helping silence the socialists.

    He did just that.

    Reagan was more of an avuncular old buffoon. I think Palin is truly evil.

    ReplyDelete
  16. "In the long-run every Government is the exact symbol of its People, with their wisdom and unwisdom; we have to say, Like People like Government.

    (Thomas Carlyle, Past and Present)

    A chilling thought, isn't it?

    ReplyDelete

We welcome civil discourse from all people but express no obligation to allow contributors and readers to be trolled. Any comment that sinks to the level of bigotry, defamation, personal insults, off-topic rants, and profanity will be deleted without notice.