"The makers of the Constitution conferred the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by all civilized men—the right to be let alone."
-Justice Louis Brandeis-
Whenever there's a lot of outrage being sold, whether it's about protecting children, preventing tax shelters or defending the faith, it's fairly safe to assume they're selling something else and it's safer to assume it's something you wouldn't have bought otherwise.
There are few things easier to bundle with invasive, intrusive or even abusive government than protecting children, hence the carefully maintained impression that children are in vastly more danger then ever before and controlling the internet in the cause of controlling people and their unwanted thoughts and words attaches to our parental fears like a remora to a shark.
A free internet
"offers anonymity that has opened the door to criminals looking to harm innocent children,"says U.S. Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican. Well of course! So does freedom of association and freedom of speech and assembly and of course, so does freedom in general. It also offers opportunities for dissent, for exposure of secrets of invidious nature and other things authoritarian and paranoid governments fear. So in order to protect the children, Cornyn would like to make sure that with every word you write, every breath you take, every move you make, he'll be watching you. listening to your calls, reading your mail, checking your financial records, tracking your movements: all these things we bought in the name of Bush's "warrontare" and yet it's not enough.
The plan is to have everything you say on the internet and a list of every search you make and every site you visit stored for the benefit of anyone who may want to investigate you -- for two years. Two bills have been introduced so far--S.436 in the Senate and H.R.1076 in the House. Both bills bear the same title: "Internet Stopping Adults Facilitating the Exploitation of Today's Youth Act," or Internet Safety Act. Both use the same words:
"A provider of an electronic communication service or remote computing service shall retain for a period of at least two years all records or other information pertaining to the identity of a user of a temporarily assigned network address the service assigns to that user."And what is a provider or remote service? If you're got a home network with a wired or wireless router, you are! Better buy another hard drive and keep it backed up, you potential child molester, you.
says CNN.com's Declan McCullagh.
"That sweeps in not just public Wi-Fi access points, but password-protected ones too, and applies to individuals, small businesses, large corporations, libraries, schools, universities, and even government agencies. Voice over IP services may be covered too."
Alberto Gonzales may be gone, George Bush may be a bad memory, but the Republican Dream lives on. A country where nothing you do is private and nothing they do is public; a country where "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects" is seen as an unnecessary impediment to control.
I'll be working out my electronic potentially criminal device in order to send forceful emails to my senator about these bills and I hope everyone, Dem or Rep do the same. Time to put your pen where your mouth is, folks. I hear all this call for less government out of the conservative camp while they keep pushing these invasive, unAmerican bills.
ReplyDeleteSo, which is it; less government or more "Big Brother?"
Can't have it both ways.
I didn't wait; I was afraid I'd get busy and forget to write, so I just went to my senator's website and sent her an email.
ReplyDeleteYou should cross-post this at Kos and have everyone contact their representatives.
ReplyDeleteI'm sure it's getting publicity, but what worries me as much as the snooping on innocent people without probably cause, is the idea that they can decide you're a criminal and demand your records and if you don't have them, you are a criminal. I think there's an element of creating laws that are nearly impossible to obey for the purpose of creating criminals of anyone they want to "get."
ReplyDeleteI recall that in Orwell's 1984, the next logical step is taken: the very concept of law implies a settled socio-political structure in which people have certain protections, so away with that troublesome concept: nothing is "illegal," but anything the Party finds inconvenient (or even insufficiently supportive) is punishable by death. Thoughtcrime doubleplus ungood! Not that our top-hat-wearing, clock-back-turning capitalists would ever say, "Oldthinkers unbellyfeel Ingsoc," but the American Far Right seems to have its own strange brand of Orwellianism these days.
ReplyDeleteGeorge Orwell was a Republican...
ReplyDelete"1984" and "Animal Farm" are now the official positions of the Republican Party.
Seems like conservatives are turning into reactionaries and democrats are becoming moderates...
Where are the conservatives that would laugh at these two bills and say, "...if you worry about your kids then get involved with them and pay attention to what they are doing..." You know take responsibility for your kids...
I am lonely!
Lol, Tao, you need to come into the Moderate light. Conservative no longer means what it once did and you will just have to adjust to this brave new world.
ReplyDeleteBesides, we are much more lively bunch!
Sooner or later everything the Republicans do or try to do will be compared with Orwell. It's too compelling; it's inevitable.
ReplyDeleteTrotting out that one dimensional "liberal - conservative" measuring stick is a waste of time. An actual conservative and an actual liberal should both be quite upset with having records kept of everything we write and everything we read and if we dropped categorizing ourselves we might realize we're all against it.
The spirit of the constitution is anathema to this kind of legislation and if we haven't all learned by this time that when they start talking about safety, it's time to sell everything and take to the hills, we deserve to live in Orwell's nightmares.
It seems that nothing means what it used to mean. It wasn't all that long ago when Americans shared a common set of fundamental principles. But now the ones that bang the drums the loudest for smaller government, free markets, and quote extensively from the Federalist Papers are the ones supporting the biggest infringement of our civil rights.
ReplyDeleteThose that claim to love this country the most and cherish the foundations that this country was established on seem to be the most angry and hateful bunch one could ever imagine...and its been the party that they support that has run the show for pretty much the last 20 years....
After listening to the Obama news conference today he might actually be the true conservative.
The Supreme Court struck down the Communications Decency Act 0f 1997, which attempted to ban online "indecency." Then Congress enacted the Child Online Protection Act (COPA), which was also struck down by a federal appeals court.
ReplyDeleteThis latest attempt violates every provision of the Constitution and will assuredly be struck down by the Courts, as were earlier attempts. Even if this bill gets passed, which I doubt, it won't happen. No way.
And even if it does, Washington will soon be swallowed by rising seas due to climate change, and all of you will wish you were an octopus, whilst I get the last laugh. So please don't tease or make fun of cephalopods because the time may come when you wish you were one.
I will always be on the ship of Truth Octo. Bring on another Great Flood God.
ReplyDelete"Bring on another Great Flood God."
ReplyDeleteGood idea, but please wait until Thursday, I'm having the barnacles scraped off my hull and propellers.
Unfortunately though, the ship of fools is much larger and usually commands the right of way.