Thursday, September 24, 2009

Free Marketplace of Love

Back in days gone by, daughters were chattel – sold off, in one way shape or form, by their fathers (or other male guardian) to the highest bidder. Daughters were a way for fathers to secure business alliances, gain political favor, etc etc etc. We sometimes euphemistically refer to this as “arranged marriages” – as if men suffered as much as the women in these marriages which were not grounded in the concept of romance or love. In many societies men could seek solace elsewhere . . . .


But NOW – at least in most portions of our world today – we have progressed towards the idea of marriages being grounded in LOVE. Two people fall in love and choose to marry – no bargaining fathers in the wings. Marriage is now a matter of choice. Love, romance are granted free reign. We have further progressed (some might argue regressed) to the point where marriage – as a legal and/or religious bond – is no longer required. Couples may choose to enter into a committed, monogamous relationship grounded in love free from legal contracts.


Thus far I have admittedly been privileging heterosexual definitions of couple-hood. The whole issue of homosexual couple-hood is historically quite different in that it has faced unique prejudices and stigmatizations. However – on the pure concept of the modern economics of love – to which I would now like to turn - I think homosexual couples face similar issues.


We have now come, it would seem, to a place in societal development where we as individuals are free to pursue our hearts desires in the finding of a mate. We may choose whom we most favor. No more forced sharing of beds with total strangers for the sake of procreation.


Now notice I have NOT brought up the subject of SEX. This is deliberate. Though I of course recognize sex as a component of love I am, in this post, concerned with the concept of love – emotionally experienced love – in its most IDEAL form. I realize trying to separate the two may be a fool’s errand, but bear with me . . .


So it would seem that we have reached nirvana – yes? A free marketplace of love wherein we may choose the best mate for a loving relationship. The world is our oyster. Yeah!


Um – yes – well – how exactly does one do this . . . . . . . . ? How does one determined which shell actually shelters a pearl?


When we need a new car we go to a dealership – or two – or three. We haggle, bargain – go for test drives – eventually choosing the best model that suits us. We strive for the best deal. Well, ok – does this approach work for choosing a mate? Certainly not! You cry. How ridiculous! Love is about the heart . . . it just happens . . . when the time is right . . . like in all of the poems, sonnets . . . it's just . . . (do I hear violins warbling?)


Yes, well – BUT - It’s impossible to spend any time on-line these days without seeing a vast array of dating sites or personals sites advertising their services like car dealerships. In recent years I’ve seen sites advertised for Christians, for Muslims, for seniors, for homosexuals, for wealthy people, and even for those seeking Russian brides (no kidding!). All one has to do, it would seem, is to choose the correct web-site – our modern day matchmakers – then program in one’s personal criteria for the perfect mate & the rest is relationship bliss!!


Hold on – criteria? What the hell does that have to do with love? Can love be so programmed? And thus bought & sold as can other things in a free market economy? If so – how is this progress? Speaking from the female perspective . . . ok – so we are no longer being pimped for economic gain by our fathers but we can now pay, and thereby provide economic gain to, these on-line services to do it for us? If this is true – how hilarious that men are now paying to be pimped!! Progress?? Is love now being pimped like sex?


Now to take a step back – not all loving relationships these days are the product of these latest money-making, love-marketing services. There are people who actually meet their true loves in the simple everyday course of their daily lives. People for whom the sentimental idealism expressed in the song


“Some Enchanted Evening”

You will see a stranger

You will see a stranger, across a crowded room

And somehow you’ll know

You’ll know even then . . . .

[South Pacific]


holds true. However . . .


. . . it would seem, based on simple economics, that for many people this is not the case. That for many people the love marketplace is the only way to seek – and perhaps find – love. Otherwise – would there be so many on-line sites peddling their wares? E-harmony has even made the jump to television marketing – that takes a lot of money. It is a sign of that company’s success at generating revenue based on its pitching of the notion that it can provide a channel towards love. So clearly there are many who sign on for help seeking a loving mate.


If this seems like a cynical post – it actually isn’t. I suspect that many people involved in the free marketplace of love (not sex) are sincerely trying to find love, someone to share their life with. However – in terms of human development, societal development – I find the question of “progress” with respect to the pursuit of love fascinating – especially in light of human history’s less than enlightened past practices with regard to the subject.


We have gained much by simply gaining the right to CHOOSE. But HOW to choose or how to FIND someone to choose is, apparently, a hurdle, a stumbling ground for the actual fulfillment of the CHOICE that we may now freely embrace.


Matchmaker, Matchmaker find me a match

Find me a find, catch me a catch

Night after night in the dark I’m alone

So find me a match of my own

[Fiddler on the Roof]


At this stage in human development it would seem that offering up the concept of FREELY CHOOSING someone to LOVE is like dangling a bunch of grapes in front of thirsty, hungry Tantalus’ nose yet just out of his reach.

17 comments:

  1. "Couples may choose to enter into a committed, monogamous relationship grounded in love free from legal contracts."

    Simply living together may constitute a legal contract in some places and entitles either parties to protections and remedies.

    Observing the real high court, Judge Judy, it's obvious that a good part of our legal system gets tied up with unraveling the results of contract free coupling, which include property and custody and more.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What a fun post! I can think of nothing more fitting for the occasion than this Cole Porter lyric:

    Birds do it, bees do it
    Even educated fleas do it
    Let's do it, let's fall in love

    Argentines and Rick Sanford do it
    I hear even Boston beans do it
    Let's do it, let's fall in love

    The chimpanzees in the zoos do it,
    Some courageous kangaroos do it
    Let's do it, let's fall in love

    I'm sure sometimes on the sly you do it
    Maybe even you and I might do it
    Let's do it, let's fall in love


    The next frontier is species intermarriage. If Kermit and Miss Piggy do it, why not open the playing field! Let plants and animals do it. Why settle for a sound-alike when you can have a real Daisy, Heather, or Rose for a mate. Imagine the possibilities: Carrots, cucumbers, and zucchini without drama.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow - I want some of what you had for breakfast! Don't Bogart that thing. . .

    ReplyDelete
  4. Our lives have been so affected by the internet that we trust a website and a profile to find us a mate more than we trust our own ability to find, to observe, and to decide for ourselves...

    Thus is the power of the internet....I am sure that there are groups out there that believe that 'cyber sex' is more fulfilling than sex...

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have always loved contemplating the image of "educated fleas!"

    Hey! wait a minute - isn't that song really about sex?!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Squid: "Hey! wait a minute - isn't that song really about sex?!"

    When coupling with plants, these lyrics from Nat King Cole come to mind:

    It was pollination
    I know
    Seeing you alone
    With the moonlight above
    Then I touch your hand
    And next moment
    Pollination turned - to – love


    So Captain Fogg wants to know what I had for breakfast this morning. I HAD what all cephalopods have for breakfast in the morning … a spicy little She-Crab.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The next frontier is species intermarriage.

    Octo, this is what Sarah Palin has just advocated in her Hong Kong speech (if I understood her correctly):

    sharing of peoples and bloodlines and wildlife and flora and fauna

    ReplyDelete
  8. Elizabeth, many thanks for the link. Here is the quote about Sarah and her husband, Todd, ending up "... here on dinner tables ... either as whole Salmon or caviar ..."

    Sheesh! Maybe we should let the bears have them and stick with vegan.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Octo - romancing with carrots, etc etc without drama? You think that do you?!

    TAO - I agree with what you say - but I think the internet has effected us also in the sense that it has changed how we communicate in general. Because of the ease with which it presents itself to us as a communication tool - we lose our sense of also needing to be part of a living, breathing community of folks. We, as a society, I think, are becoming increasingly internalized on an individual basis.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "romancing with carrots, etc etc without drama?"

    But, Squid, my fellow cephalopod in arms, think of how satisfying is a good salad undressing!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Squid,

    Interesting post -- I don't know where to come down on the issue. There's much to be said for serendipity in the forming of relationships, while a net-spawned romance seems like it would be much more planned and pedestrian....

    Of course, many have found that one of the most awkward and painful things about desire is the necessity of its dissimulation, the multiplicity of social and even internal constraints placed upon its free expression. "Just meeting someone" has never been easy -- not that you're suggesting it is. It may take some of the confusion out of the whole affair if you know that the other person you're interested in is at least interested in being interested, whether in you or in someone else.

    But then, what would I know? We dinos just choose our mates around the watering hole and have done with it. Simple.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Now, why do you hate bears so, Octo? You are not going to get far in that interspecies mingling with this attitude. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  13. I have nothing against bears. Its just that ... talking about Sarah and Todd ... I always knew there was something fishy about those two.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Ahem - OCTO - my dearest fellow cephalopod - just how many good salads are you imagining to be undressing? And does this include the she-crab you had for lunch?!! Mmmmm? You should know better than to toy with a squid!

    Dino - yes we carnivorous squid aren't terribly knowledgeable about romance and love either. If a male squid makes a female squid wait by her shell phones (forgive me!) then we are likely to literally devour him & rip him to shreds.

    But as for the human species - there is much in what you say. The desire to lovingly connect is strong in humans. I suspect using online resources has its advantages & disadvantages. No doubt like many things - it will be partly at least defined by those who use it. And, I suspect, that for humans, unlike dinos, finding an inviting watering hole is often difficult.

    And, in all due seriousness, Dino, I do think that the growing presence of online dating sites & the like are a very telling symptom of the human world's DECREASING socialization.

    ReplyDelete
  15. On behalf of my dear friends, Squid and Bloggingdino, here is my humble …

    Cephalopod Guide to Dating and Mating

    An octopus does not mate until the end of life. Thus, we do not concern ourselves with matters of romance, compatibility, domestic chores, finances, buying a house, child rearing, life insurance, investments, or retirement.

    When the time comes, we find a mate, make a clutch (100,000 eggs at least!), tend the clutch until they hatch, then waste away. When our nymphs and nymphets are born, we die. In short, we don’t date, just mate. That’s it.

    With human beings, they date and mate early in their lives and, for better or worse, must live with the consequences for a lifetime. One can understand why human beings obsess over romance, compatibility, domestic chores, finances, buying a house, child rearing, life insurance, investments, retirement and … yikes … a college education for the clutch. That’s a lotta drama.

    ReplyDelete
  16. It was late last night, and (O)CT(O)PUS should have left a postscript. With respect to matters of Eros and Thanatos, there is a significant time interval among humans that separates the former from the latter, whereas, among cephalopods, the former leads quickly to the latter. Perhaps an obvious point but one almost always lost on humans.

    Since I am a cephalopod, not Ann Landers, I offer no advice to the lovelorn (except to remind our dated but as yet unmated readers to try herb-flavored condoms when your salad is undressing).

    ReplyDelete
  17. This is getting way too kinky for me.

    ReplyDelete

We welcome civil discourse from all people but express no obligation to allow contributors and readers to be trolled. Any comment that sinks to the level of bigotry, defamation, personal insults, off-topic rants, and profanity will be deleted without notice.