Saturday, November 7, 2009

Rape, racism and Republicans

A friend of mine used to have the job, back during the Vietnam war, of flying a helicopter over dangerous areas so as to draw fire from hidden gun emplacements, flushing out the enemy so that we knew where they were. Barak Obama has been a bit like that and sad to say, I've now identified far too many enemies, some that I thought were friends.

I got another e-mail this morning, from someone I would hardly call a redneck: a northeasterner, ex military intelligence with a long career at the Pentagon. "I despair for the country" was the title and it had a link to a YouTube video wherein the President confesses to being a Muslim. It's an obvious cut and paste job that wouldn't fool anyone who didn't want to be fooled -- and there's the rub. Too many want to be fooled and bask like pigs in the warm and stinky deception. The hate and fear of our President long preceded his election and for some it preceded his birth. The closeted racists of America desperately need such insultingly stupid stories as a defense against the obviously true accusations of racism.

I grew up in the 1950's and I'm no stranger to segregation or blood in the streets for that matter, but still I'm amazed at the breadth and depth of the long concealed and highly fermented racial and ethnic hatred that's been lurking in the jungle and is emerging like tracer bullets whose dotted line shows the way, right to their source.

I can't count the outraged e-mails and comments I've seen about the recent California schoolyard rape, which of course has allowed the haters to vent their paranoid fear and loathing of Hispanics. It was of course a Hispanic girl who reported it, not a "regular" American as Archie Bunker would have said, but no matter. Hate has its own sort of statistics and only needs an example to declare it "typical." Indeed, it doesn't even have to be true if you have even a mediocre shareware video editing program.

In its own way, this sick and disgusting incident seems not to be out of context of what is happening in many disparate groups, even of white, Anglo-Saxon protestants, marching in the streets for lower taxes as though Obama had actually raised them; showing pictures of Nazi death camps as though any sane person connects piles of murdered bodies to a government administered health plan -- the people who call the Democratic health care bill "Obamacare" but never think to call Social Security Roosevelt Retirement or identified the GI bill with Communism or call the public library the Socialist Book Store -- or identify the recession with Republican economic policies. These things and more are part of the Us against Them view where the government is "them," the 15% fringe element and the corporate lobbyists are "We the people," the government is the enemy and only illegitimately exercised authority is legitimate.

The twenty or so witnesses to this crime, if they had any compassion at all, were prevented by the entertainment value and hatred of police and the Maverick mentality from doing anything or reporting anything. The criminals are The People, the cops are not and the law is the enemy because it interferes with our freedom to commit crimes ad libidum. Is that really different from not caring how many innocents are killed abroad in a war started and continued under false pretenses and appeals to fear and patriotism? Is that different from not giving a flying damn how many millions die, how many sick children clog the emergency rooms and drive up the cost of insurance and spread disease, or how many lives are ruined by insurance companies? Its them against us and 'them' are the unfortunate, the minorities, the sick the old and unemployed. Who wants the damned law and the government to help them even if it protects us too?

Perhaps you find the connection tenuous or even far-fetched, but I don't. There is no "us" in the US any more unless it's in the context of us against them and that miserable, militant and malicious group who flatter themselves with the stolen title of 'Conservative' are as much to blame as anyone for the rape that is our for-profit, cartel run health "system." Anyone who brings the government in is a "snitch."

Oh no, it's those liberals who insist any criticism of the President is racist and we're not racist at all - it's just that he's a foreign born, Marxistnaziterroristracist who "hates white culture" (whatever the hell that is) and murdered his grandmother and wants to murder yours. It's because he's trying to reconstitute the Auschwitz death camp by giving us health insurance, not because he's a Ni - I mean black.

Hey, we're not responsible for not reporting a vicious and nearly fatal rape, it's because we can't trust the cops, the cops are the problem, the government is the problem and we want less government, you know.

5 comments:

  1. Is that different from not giving a flying damn how many millions die, how many sick children clog the emergency rooms and drive up the cost of insurance and spread disease, or how many lives are ruined by insurance companies? Its them against us and 'them' are the unfortunate, the minorities, the sick the old and unemployed. Who wants the damned law and the government to help them even if it protects us too?

    This is an interesting point. I can imagine the teabagger protests already.

    America has the best anti-rape system in the world! Who cares if we let 15% of the population get raped -- protecting 100% would be socialism!

    If we call the cops about this, it'll mean a complete government take-over of our park benches!

    I'll never get raped (I'm a guy) -- why should I pay for police to protect someone else from the bad lifestyle choice of being female?

    You know where else the police arrested rapists? Nazi Germany! The anti-rape police-state fascists are just like Hitler!

    Nowhere in the Constitution does it specifically empower the government to regulate rape. We need to stop this statist power grab!

    The police have no authority because we haven't seen the police chief's original birth certificate! What does he have to hide?!

    This may sound ridiculous, but what could have been going through the heads of the "Dirty Thirty" who voted against Franken's amendment on the KBR / Jamie Leigh Jones case? "Oh come on, it's already difficult for these poor corporations to recruit good employees to go to Iraq.....if they can't let 'em blow off steam with an occasional gang-rape, it'll become impossible."

    Who knows, it may become the next teabagger crusade after they lose on health-care reform.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Actually, the Republicans who voted against Senator Franken's bill don't support rape. They simply don't care if someone is raped. Shielding corporations from lawsuits... that is what they care about. Who needs laws when we have contracts? Who needs the police and courts when we have binding arbitration? We should put all our trust in corporations and the free market... and shrink government down to the size where we can drown it in the bathtub.

    Do Republicans "flatter themselves with the stolen title of Conservative"? I don't know. I prefer the term "fiscally responsible" to "fiscally Conservative". One thing is certain though, since Reagan Republican "conservatism" has been nothing but a scam.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for the laugh infidel - I really, really need a laugh!

    Fiscally responsible? Now doesn't that sound like Socialism?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I definitely learned something new here. Rape is being physically irresponsible, the libruls are at fault, Lieberman will veto the Senate healthcare reform bill, and the Republicans are the Pinata Party.

    Oy! Wake me when its over.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Strangely, the number of witnesses at the scene actually limited the chance someone would call the police. Remember Kitty Genovese? There is something about the mob mentality that strips away all sense of responsibility, which is why the best way to stop a riot is to call the names of individuals in the crowd.

    ReplyDelete

We welcome civil discourse from all people but express no obligation to allow contributors and readers to be trolled. Any comment that sinks to the level of bigotry, defamation, personal insults, off-topic rants, and profanity will be deleted without notice.