Friday, September 17, 2010

IMO: What's Right On What's Wrong

No pictures today. No jokes. There'll be plenty more to come, I imagine. Today, I want to spell out what I think is happening in our country, what I think it means, and where I believe true morality lies. This is for me. And for JMartin.

I had a couple of comments on a recent post( on my individual blog) from JMartin who made it clear that he or she did not agree with me, but was not swayed by demagogues like Beck and Palin. This commentor was interested in what others, who did not share his or her opinions, had to say. I realized that I read so many progressive blogs--from writers who are dead serious, to writers who use sharp-honed humor beautifully, to writers who wax obscene to make their point--I just assumed that everyone knows all the arguments, all the issues, all the stances available on the left. And that anyone can instantly recognize all of my positions by extrapolating logically from a joke here and a jab there. Or, else, I assume that no one gives a damn what I think. Well, maybe someone might.

So, here's what I think (and I'm not taking time to justify or explain these positions on this post):

1. The War In Afghanistan: The President could not have gotten elected if he had run on pulling us out of both wars at once, so he chose the one on which public opinion had most obviously soured. The Afghanistan surge was a waste of men and money, an expedient that just stirs the hornet's nest. Continuing to back Karzai was wrong. We can't afford to stay on in Afghanistan. The task now is to get out with some balance between saving global face (which ain't what it used to be, if it ever was) and minimizing further loss of life. And that's a balance that cannot be struck. It will be ugly for the Afghans; it will be publicized; we will be vilified; we will have deserved it. Bite that bullet, Mr. President. Fight terrorism as a police action, because terrorists are criminals; proceed accordingly. If there'd been a draft, neither war would have happened; we'd have cared enough to pay attention.

2.The Koch Party: At the bottom of the pile is the duped herd that actually thinks it is part of a grass-roots movement. This mass thinks it's been had, but it is confused about who the enemy is. It's members follow pied pipers, demagogues, and fools (Beck, Palin, Limbaugh) who are blinded by their own celebrity; they are delusional narcissists. Behind the mass and driving it are politicos who are determined to regain power at all costs (Gingrich, Boehner) and who believe that the end justifies the means. And, above the dust of this cattle drive are the Kochs, Murdoch, Cheney and corporate Robber Barons who believe that they belong to an entirely different species from the rest of us...and that works for them as long as we agree with their assumption that they deserve to be in control.

3. The Fundamentalists:  These are often so braided into The Koch Party and the Republican Party, they can be fooled into thinking they have a vital role in both--even a leadership role. Their primary cause is opposition to abortion and to anything that legitimatizes the LGBT citizenry. In fact, they provide a smokescreen that permits the Robber Barons to operate freely to ensure their financial monopoly. As long as the Fundamentalists are willing to beat the morality drum, Big Money will finance their cause. It's about the money. Corporate interests could not care less who gets an abortion, who marries whom.

The Republican party is hoping to let Reverend Beck and Spokesmodel Palin hold the moral hot potatoes for them, leaving the Repubs free to go after independents who have been scared into believing that only unfettered free markets can save us. We tried that already; they didn't and they won't.

4. Wall Street, Big Bank, and Capitalism: Investing is a game of chance largely played by computers now. We've applied our creativity and our energy to designing more and more complex financial products with which to rip off  the working class. Capitalism is a fine thing, but it is a cancer if it goes unregulated. The function of markets is amoral. Greenspan should be prosecuted. Elizabeth Warren should chair Consumer Protection, not advise it...unless there's a Cabinet position for her, even better.  Free markets will NOT operate indefinitely on their own to benefit individuals and the society, as the Bush years proved. In a society that worships The Free Market, money operates as a test of right and wrong--the good make it and the bad fail. And that's not right; hell, it's not even wrong.

5. The Economy, Taxes and Jobs: Mr. President, dump Geithner and Summers. Repeal tax cuts for the wealthiest echelon and save the endangered middle class. But do incentivize banks to loan to small businesses, which are more inclined to grow and hire. (Huge corporations are primarily motivated to perpetuate themselves and continue to grow profits by laying off, dropping benefits, and going off-shore for cheap labor; they do not turn tax cuts into jobs for Americans. They haven't in the last eight years and they won't, period.)  And, Mr. President, push those infrastructure jobs now. Not later; now. They won't put enough of America back to work to turn the economy around, but they might prevent another man-made disaster. We are already becoming a Second World country, with our potholes, our failed levees, our crumbling bridges and rupturing gas lines.

6. Healthcare: Change had to begin, but, no matter how many times I read about the palatable separate ingredients included, I fear that too many crooks cooks spoiled this broth. Glad we did it. Worried about it.

7. The Democrat's task: The real moral message is that the Koch Party, the Party of Wall Street, the Party of Big Oil, the Party of Big Insurance does not care one iota about those of us who earn less than that proverbial $250,00 a year. They sure as hell don't care about those of us who earn less than $100,00 a year. What's truly immoral is that our earnings are stagnant or reduced, our retirement funds were raped and left to die, we all know someone who was laid off and can't find work. We were seduced by predatory lending and our hopes, our credit, our very country, was destroyed when Wall Street bet that we couldn't pay off those loans. Small businesses cannot get loans now; they'd hire us if they could.

8. The Deficit Reduction Commission: Alan Simpson is demented. Social Security is not the problem; years and years of war is a much bigger problem. If Soc.Sec. is privatized, Wall St. will get that, too. At which point, every state might as well legalize assisted suicide.

How could anyone vote for the party that designed and engineered those moral crimes? How could anyone vote for the confused Koch Party candidates? How could anyone vote for the Republicans who ignored our streets, our gas lines, our levees? How could anyone vote for the party that was brought to you by Big Oil, and radicalized beyond the point where they are recognizable? How could you vote for any party that doesn't care enough about the unemployed to extend them the pittance of unemployment compensation? How could anyone vote for the party that wants to hold the middle class hostage to tax breaks for the richest 2% of the country?



[Imma turn the mic back over to Slutticia von Heretik, now]

p.s. Well, okay, maybe just this one picture. Big H/T to Tom Degan at The Rant





13 comments:

  1. Can I sooooo steal the picture and post it on Facebook?? I love it!!

    Great post.

    #5. I have been screaming about the fact that those tax cuts have been in place and the economy is still crap for 2 years. No one listens.

    #6. And the crowd said, "Amen"

    #7. The problem is that many, many, many don't see that the GOP HATES us. The see anti-abortion, God hates fags and people screaming about Jesus. Why would a black person EVER vote Republican? Ever? Why would a poor person vote that way? Even someone like Oprah, who NOW has billions of dollars, but was raised poor and may be old enough to remember when it was REALLY bad to be black. (As opposed to now, when I am guessing it is only pretty bad, but I am not black).

    #8. Makes me cry.

    ReplyDelete
  2. LLL,
    Thanks! Take that little image and create all the delightful havoc with it that you possibly can.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Excellent summing up.

    Now take these issues and present them to a complacent, incurious, consumerist electorate and that's when the fun starts.

    Given that we Americans mediate the world through switching a channel, downloading iTunes or buying stuff its easy to see why the loudest, crassest, most simplistic slogans resonate.

    It takes time and willingness to become informed and it takes being informed and empathetic to be a good citizen.

    At the end of the day who really wants to make the effort when there's shopping to be done?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sums it up for me too. Do you think I could trademark this and get a penny royalty for each click:

    ApocaLips Palin?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Excellent, well reasoned, clearly stated rant Nance. Says it all for me.
    Octo - ApocaLips Palin!?! Priceless! Hurry up at get that trademark protection!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Velvet paintings, penny royalties...we'll be rich! And then I might have to try to protect all that wealth, think it belongs to me, think I deserve it, and...aw, hell, let's just stick with being generally brilliant.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Obama was stuck with the war in Afghanistan - the problem is, he's showing no signs of getting us out of there.

    Admittedly, having gone in and blown the crap out of, the fundamentalists are using that as evidence that the USA hates Islam, and if we leave without making things a bit better, the Taliban will radicalize the country, and it will be very bad for them, and eventually, possibly very bad for us. So it's a balancing act.

    On the other hand, although I can see the use of targeted assassinations, I find it morally appalling that we're sanctioning it at all, and somewhat depressed that we aren't even doing it well.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Nance,

    Well reasoned and stated. But the people who need to internalize your points can't. I'm sorry if I sound elitist, but the fact is that so many in the tea party mentality don't know jack about complex issues. As you so succinctly state, it's easier to be told what to be against than to sort it out yourself. Hence useful idiots like Palin, Limbaugh, and Beck.

    Why do stupid people capture the imagination of so many Americans?

    Oh. Wait...

    ReplyDelete
  9. Nice site! We sure as hell do live in interesting times, do we not?

    Keep 'em coming!

    All the best,

    Tom Degan

    ReplyDelete
  10. I agree with every point you make except, unfortunately, I also think the Democrats are as complicit in handing power over to the Koch Party as the Republicans. Though not quite as monolithic as the Republicans, most of our Democrats (especially the Senate ones) seem to be as interested in making sure Wall Street crooks and corporate cronies continue to steal the nation's wealth and return us to turn of the century style income gaps, where a privileged few enjoy their mansions and the rest of us live in squalor.

    ReplyDelete
  11. We all have different ideas of what constitutes a mansion, but what if your mansion is squalid too?

    Seriously, turnabout may sometimes be fair play, but it may also not be. The problem is that we let money absolve people from responsibility rather than add to it.

    Where is our Kipling to remind us of the Rich Man's Burden?

    ReplyDelete
  12. I just wanted to say that this is one of the best posts I have read in a long time.

    ReplyDelete

We welcome civil discourse from all people but express no obligation to allow contributors and readers to be trolled. Any comment that sinks to the level of bigotry, defamation, personal insults, off-topic rants, and profanity will be deleted without notice.