Tuesday, January 4, 2011

The long history and bright future of the end of the world

Prophets are always disappointed dear Nostradamus. That's why new ones are always in the wings updating the catastrophes

-Andre Codrescu-

I remember the late 1970's when the new-agers were petting their pieces of quartz and telling us in solemn reverential tones that Mother Shipton had predicted the end of the world in 1982; although some said 1981.
The world to an end shall come
In nineteen hundred and eighty one.
Such is the malleability and durability of prophecy. Although prophecies said to be from the Yorkshire prophetess born in about 1488 were published in 1641, eighty years after the reported end of her days, they really didn't predict the end of the world but rather a series of catastrophes in the vague idiom of soothsayers and fortune tellers throughout time. In fact it's questionable that she ever lived, much more questionable that she was Satan's daughter, glowed in the dark and was not the fabrication of 17the century writers. Her prediction of the death of Cardinal Wolsey, for instance, was published years after the man died.

In the air men shall be seen,
In white, in black and in green….
Iron in the water shall float,
As easy as a wooden boat.

It wasn't until the mid 19th century in 1862 that Shipton's startling predictions of things like balloons and telegraphy and diving bells and England finally allowing Jews to live there appeared courtesy of Charles Hindley, who wrote it and publicly admitted of having done so. Of course he had predicted eighteen eighty one as the end time, but someone in the wings was happy to update it for the next century's crop of 20th century gulls.

Carriages without horses shall go,
And accidents fill the world with woe.
Around the world thoughts shall fly
In the twinkling of an eye.

Perhaps not so startling having been written in the age of steam transportation and the telegraph, of iron ships and submarine boats and hydrogen baloons, all of which existed already in Hindley's time. It's almost biblical in having predicting things ex post facto and passing off of current idiom as the dialect of the remote past. Any passing familiarity with late 15th century English should have set off alarms, I should think, but it's no surprise to find such ignorance amongst the hip and eager cognoscenti.

Shams and delusions are esteemed for soundest truths, while reality is fabulous.

-Henry David Thoreau-


Few of the crystal gazers, if any, bothered to risk the delicious feeling of being in the know to the extent of finding out that it was a hoax. Indeed, even today one finds lengthy and utterly fictional web posts about stealing the prophecies of Mother Shipton from secret rooms at secret libraries where the scrolls had been hidden "by the government" so as not to panic the people. Delicious indeed and it seems to fill some human desire for arcana, for ancient wisdom and the cheap high it brings. There is always someone to fill that need whether it be political groups with dire warnings about NATO hiding H bombs under Philadelphia, Obama hiding death panels in his health care reform, Mayan prophecy or some equally ludicrous cataclysm from John of Patmos.

Certainly most things will in time have an end; perhaps time itself, but it's not so much the knowledge of the inevitable that intrigues us, enthralls us, but the idea that the processes of entropy, the chaotic randomness of the universe have something to do with our species and its thoughts and actions and the myths of our more ignorant ancestors. Secret, undetectable energies and entities with the secret hopes and fears are delectable and they distract us from the utterly uncaring, incomprehensible emptiness of existence. They create a universe in which we might mean something, might feel at least temporarily superior to the other lumps of fragile mortality around us and so in twenty one and eighty two, Old Mother Shipton will have predicted yet another end and perhaps the Mayans math will be updated or reinterpreted and mankind reprieved for a hundred years. Jesus' ETA will still be imminent, the hidden Imam about to be revealed and the last days yet at hand. We'll still wave pieces of quartz and utter powerful words and formulae from an invented past. We'll still have some ancient calendar and myth. We'll still follow, as we were meant to

One that would would fain seem wise and learnt, and is but a fool and an ignorant self-conceited gull.

-John Florio-


There will be no final day I hear
While prophets whimper in our ear
of signs and portents in the skies
and issue forth unending lies.

Into the crystal ball we'll gaze
the obvious shall seem a maze
But never mind and never fear
It won't all end until next year.

-Father Fogg-

8 comments:

  1. Great companion post Capt! It brings to mind the fact that each and every one of us has an end of days. None of us will be getting out alive.
    Whether that day is tomorrow, May 21 or 20 years from now makes no difference in how i live my life - to live in the moment, the here and now is to live life fully.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The woods decay, the woods decay and fall,
    The vapours weep their burthen to the ground,
    Man comes and tills the field and lies beneath,
    And after many a summer dies the swan.

    I'm afraid a whole universe dies with each of us. As the poet says, immortality is cruel, but life is too short. I think an entire universe dies with each of us, with every living thing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Capt. Fogg,

    Well, if Tennyson says it, I say it's good.

    A thought occurred to me a while back -- and dinosaurs don't have many thoughts that don't have directly to do with sinking their teeth into some other dinosaur, so listen up y'all: there are many theories about the progress of the universe or multiverse, one of which is the Gib Gnab that says someday the uni will collapse in on itself and we'll have a reverse big bang, and then it'll all start over again. Some physicists don't like that one, but I don't trust anyone with a brain larger than my own (walnut, you'll recall). Anyhow, my thought is that the deck is always stacked in favor of life:

    We are sentient beings at present, but one day we'll die and become inanimate. And who knows for how long? Does it matter? I suppose the dead don't experience time -- to be out for "ten trillion trillion years" is the same to the dead as to be out for an hour in the dentist's chair. It don't make no nevermind.

    Perhaps, then, "we" shall awaken someday, a few dozen universes from now, as some other conscious or sentient being -- I just mean that the matter of which we were composed will be part of some living thing again. We're all just animate stardust, right? It may be that the new "us" will be a blade of grass on planet HeeHaw22L, or a godlike, ultra-conscious critter that lives for millions of years on planet HoHum73TVL, or -- well, you get the idea. And since the inanimate don't experience the passage of "time," might it not be that there is only a seemingly unbroken and infinite series of such reanimations? In this sense, the idea of permanent death could well be an illusion.

    How does that sound? Remember, you're dealing with a lizard here, but somehow my theory makes sense to me, and it's perhaps not too far removed from the way Hinduism conceives of the vast cycles of cosmic time.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Can a carbon atom be a "we" or "us?" If so, we'll be part of many things, perhaps including -- more likely including a cloud of dust, a lump of floating stuff or a fragment of plasma in some star which is the most likely in the short term if you consider 50 billion years the short term. I don't know about the long term, but my atoms have a good 10 to the 30th years to worry about re-assembly and finding a software backup without which I'd just be some organic goo.

    Then there's the entropy thing, but I haven't had my second cup of coffee yet.

    Seeing as our material was once part of a star, even if only during the last moments of that star, we could say that we're somewhat less than plasmatic stars, but we're not. The 'we,' to my way of thinking, lies in something else and something not separable from our components and their history. Reassemble every last component and we still have no continuity with what we once were.

    It's very poetic to think we're walking on Whitman as we stroll through the grass, but there's more of him in the leaves of his books.

    I like to think that the usness of us is not inherent in the atoms, but in an arrangement which will not occur again. I don't find much of an intimation of immortality when contemplating being eaten by a shark. I won't be the shark.

    The thing I'm most grateful for however is that there won't be a me waiting for miraculous re-assembly. I'm not easily bored, but a trillion, trillion years?

    ReplyDelete
  5. ma però che già mai di questo fondo
    non tornò vivo alcun. . . .

    ReplyDelete
  6. The crucified planet Earth,
    should it find a voice
    and a sense of irony,
    might now well say
    of our abuse of it,
    "Forgive them, Father,
    They know not what they do."

    The irony would be
    that we know what
    we are doing.

    When the last living thing
    has died on account of us,
    how poetical it would be
    if Earth could say,
    in a voice floating up
    perhaps
    from the floor
    of the Grand Canyon,
    "It is done."
    People did not like it here
    .

    - Kurt Vonnegut (2005) -

    ReplyDelete
  7. Capt. Fogg,

    Yes, that's the rub, if one construes it as a rub: this "we" is itself an illusion if we're expecting continuity of consciousness AS THE SAME THING, I think. My simple-dino-suggestion is only that what we are composed of may "always" (leaving room for those ten-trillion-year stretches as a rock, etc.) be participating in life, some way or somehow. That's starlight-cold comfort if one expects to wake up ten billion trillion years from the here and now as Capt. Fogg or bloggingdino.

    What is lost is lost, and teaches us to die as well. I see no way around that thought, just speaking for myself, and it seems scarcely possible to put away the melancholy cast of it by basking in notions about some part of me, or they, taking part in some grand cosmic comedy. Perhaps there are no happy endings -- only an infinity of beginnings.

    As for the Dante quotation, striking part of Inferno indeed -- I love the Paradiso, with its fine effects of light. Everything is awash in "il primo amore," it seems, and to varying degrees.

    ReplyDelete
  8. All In all, I agree, but then the amount of life in the universe is so vanishingly smell even if we have underestimated it by a hundred orders of magnitude that I'm sure my lonesome atoms will spend eternity as a gas cloud until the universe reaches absolute zero at which point there are no points and everything is everywhere.

    I don't think we're separable - as physical objects - from the universe and consequently from time and space. We're already gone.

    ReplyDelete

We welcome civil discourse from all people but express no obligation to allow contributors and readers to be trolled. Any comment that sinks to the level of bigotry, defamation, personal insults, off-topic rants, and profanity will be deleted without notice.