Sunday, January 8, 2012

That frothy mix

I have to assume that Rick Santorum is still in the race to be the GOP nominee because he hopes that some simultaneous outbreak of monkey pox will wipe out the rest of the field. That, or, as a good Catholic, he enjoys a little flagellation every so often - it's good for the soul.

He is probably the thirteenth or fourteenth least-electable candidate in the history of humanity, but we can't seem to get him to just shut the hell up and go away.

Even before the primary, Santorum was surging in Iowa (eeewww!) at 15%, but he still can't seem to consistently break 5% nationally. Not that he isn't optimistic (or possibly sadistic): he put it a few weeks ago, "I'm counting on the people of Iowa to catch fire for me." (Which seems unnecessarily cruel, but what do I know?)

The problem is that Santorum is just the latest flavor of not-Romney to hit the shelves. It's his turn to be touted nationally for the next few weeks, until somebody remembers that we're electing a president, not a pope.

Santorum has two major disabilities that are going to prevent his election: his sanctimonious, unpleasant nature, and his aggressively ignorant and regressive social policies. His entire platform, as far as I can tell, seems to be abortion and gay marriage - everything else is secondary. If he were, by some miracle, to be elected president, we'd have an uninterrupted 4-year fiesta of fag-punching.

We know that Santorum is so homophobic that he'll only eat a corndog with a knife and fork, but is he also racist? Well, that one's a little trickier. He has, for a long time, been consistently in favor of the full GOP stand on immigration: no amnesty for illegal immigrants, and likewise no benefits for them; deport criminals, strengthen border security, and even the somewhat trickier "English as the official language" stance. And while that has overtones of "scary brown people," it's the Republican party line. So no points there.

On the other hand, it's somewhat telling when you stand in front of a group of white people from Iowa (a redundant statement, but let's move on) and explained that "I don't want to make black people's lives better by giving them somebody else's money; I want to give them the opportunity to go out and earn the money."



His first explanation was that he didn't remember making the comment. Faced with the video, he huddled with his campaign, but the best they could come up with was that he "mumbled it... I was starting to say one word and I sort of came up with a different word and then moved on."

What he couldn't seem to explain was what that "one word" was. "Blaa" is a pretty unique sound. Who does he not want to help? Bloggers? Bluefin tuna? Blink 182?

Blacks?

But let's move beyond that. What would a Rick Santorum presidency do for America? Well, let's consider his belief system for just a moment. What does Rick Santorum believe in?

His career should have been over after he tried to make political points leading the charge in the Terry Schiavo case, exploiting the pain of the family of a provably brain-dead woman. But he weathered that (presumably, the $250 thousand he earned in campaign contributions from the Schiavo debacle helped a lot).

Rick Santorum believes that birth control is directly responsible for the moral decline of America, saying "the dangers of contraception in this country, the sexual liberty idea and many in the Christian faith have said, you know contraception is OK. It’s not OK because it’s a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be."

He wrote an article in 2002 blaming pedophilia in Catholic priests on "moral relativism" and "cultural liberalism."

This is a man who said that John McCain, who was tortured while a POW in Vietnam, "doesn't understand how enhanced interrogation works."

He tried to require the "No Child Left Behind" law to ensure that creationism was taught in schools.

In 2007, the Center for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington named him one of the twenty most corrupt members of Congress.

Will Bunch, the senior writer and columnist for the Philadelphia Daily News has covered politics in Pennsylvania since shortly after Rick Santorum was elected for the first time. He wrote a fascinating article from a Philadelphian's point of view entitled "The Rick Santorum That America Doesn't Know." Take a few minutes and read it - it's worth your time.

But the worst thing I know about Rick Santorum is what happened when his wife Karen was 20 weeks pregnant. Her non-viable fetus was not expected to survive, and the mother developed an infection. And Rick Santorum, who is opposed to abortion for any reason, allowed the doctors to give his wife pitocin to speed the birth. And while that may have been wildly hypocritical, what followed was completely insane.

After spending the night with the dead fetus on the bed between them, they took the body home with them, and forced their children to cuddle with it and sing songs to it. Ms Santorum even proudly wrote a book about it.

Where the hell was Child Protective Services when this was going on? Where was the Health Department?

The worst thing that could possibly happen to America would be a Rick Santorum presidency: I wonder how long it would take him to appoint a Grand Inquisitor?

And yet, he is suddenly one of the two front-runners in the GOP field. Is the Republican Party so desperate to find an alternative, any alternative, to the robotic hair-helmet that is Mitt Romney that they're willing to embrace anyone at all?

7 comments:

  1. Thank you!!!!!! You said it well!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. If any readers of faith visit this blog, I have some important questions I would like to ask of you. If our country elects a person of faith as president, such as Rick “Frothy” Santorum, it is important for me to know what to expect. That is why I am seeking advice regarding some of C-D’s laws and how to best follow them:

    1 - When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord (Lev 1:9). The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. How shall I smite them?

    2 - I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

    3 - Since I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual unseemliness (Lev 15:19-24), the problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.

    4 - Lev. 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. I have a friend who claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

    5 - I have a neighbor who works on the Sabbath. According to Exodus 35:2, he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?

    6 - Lev 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I admit to wearing glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?

    7 - Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev 19:27. How should they die?

    8 - I know from Lev 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

    9 - My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also curses and blasphemes a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them (Lev 24:10-16)? Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws (Lev. 20:14)?


    So, if someone like Rick “Frothy” Santorum is elected president, it is important for me to know these things. Please accept my thanks in advance for any help our readers can provide.

    ReplyDelete
  3. .

    Pal ese,

    This too will pass. The RepublicanT Party will have Mr Romney as the party's nominee.

    The extreme 'not Romney' crazies will probably not turn out to vote in November. As much as they hate Mr Obama they will not be able to overcome their distrust of Mr Romney. (Mr Romney is, after all, not one of them.)

    The bat-sh!t crazy base have been able to push Mr Romney far to the right. One can expect the Democratic Party campaign to force Mr Romney leftward, trying to convince the middle that he, Mr Romney is really sane. Each step toward the light of sanity will lose Mr Romney the whacko base votes.

    Mr Santorum, (and his positions), as crazy as he has been, is not nationally electable. He and Gewt Ningrich will leave Mr Romney seriously wounded.

    Ema Nymton
    ~@:o?
    .

    ReplyDelete
  4. Santorum is a deeply disturbed individual who needs to be in therapy, not running for president.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ema, oh Ema - Do not be so sure of your premise. In fact many non Romney supporters {I KNOW MANY} have told me that in the final days, if it comes to it, they will rally around Romney to defeat Obama.

    Your candidate, as is Romney, is wounded as a result of disappointing the base of your party and their ideology.

    My prediction at this early stage is that it will be a very tight general election. In other words neither party can take anything for granted.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Santorum is serving a useful purpose. It's more or less a death knell for his brand of hardcore religious and sexual intolerance. It was pure joy to hear the young Vermont republicans take him apart on gay marriage yesterday. It doesn't seem like blind coincidence that his downfall seems to be happening just moments after an ethnic Malaysian politician is justly acquitted on sodomy charges. What did Santorum say? "The Constitution does not guarantee privacy?" Scary shit.

    And I constantly hear that Romney will "move to the center..." You can't just move to the center. It's not like steering a car or playing a game. Just like Lucy complained to Ricky, "What do you do? Write down everything I say?" There is a permanent record of his every public breakfast conversation uploaded or transcribed by somebody. He can't just pull back on his radical stance on immigration for instance. Get ready to return to El Salvador, Guatemala, South America, Asia, Europe and India all you wicked illegals. You can't backpedal that. He's a big phony and nobody really trusts him.

    Obama OTOH made a calculated move to the center both to get elected and to work with conservative elements in congress. He never misrepresented himself and has shown constancy.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Nameless,

    I think the G.I. appointment would come on the PDQ. Maybe January 23rd 2013. The worst thing about RS is that he probably believes a lot of what he says. He may even believe all of it. Listening to him makes a body yearn for the calming stream of glib hypocrisy issuing from the talk-nozzles of some of the other candidates.

    ReplyDelete

We welcome civil discourse from all people but express no obligation to allow contributors and readers to be trolled. Any comment that sinks to the level of bigotry, defamation, personal insults, off-topic rants, and profanity will be deleted without notice.