First celebrated nationally in 1937, Columbus Day pays homage to Christopher Columbus' arrival in the Americas. It is, needless to say, viewed very differently by different groups of Americans. Some people forget it's a holiday at all. Some Italian Americans see it as a point of cultural pride. Other people — especially Native Americans — point out that Columbus personally oversaw the murder and enslavement of thousands and see the holiday as an intrinsically cruel celebration of the beginning of a massive genocide and generations of oppression.Christopher Columbus, much like George Washington and Thomas Jefferson after him, is a widely mythologized figure, remembered in song and story for having discovered America, thereby proving once and for all that the world was round.
Thanks to the miracle of the American educational system, that's pretty much all most Americans know about the story. It also happens to be complete crap.
First of all (and this argument is actually known by most Americans), how could he have "discovered" America when the Native Americans were already there? Or when the Vikings were in Greenland, and possibly points south, from the tenth century through the mid-fifteenth century?
(There's also the theory that Chinese Admiral Zheng He discovered America in 1421, but that's been mostly debunked - Zheng He [a.k.a. "Cheng Ho"] stuck primarily to known trade routes, and visited India, the Middle East and Africa, the islands around them, and some various stops in Asia.)
On top of which, the people of Europe were well aware that the world was round: Aristotle had proven that in the 4th Century BC.
You might also think that Queen Isabella of Spain gave him her jewels to fund the trip: actually, she turned him down. It was King Ferdinand who overruled her and paid for half the expedition; the other half was financed by Italian investors who Columbus had lined up.
What were the names of his ships? The Niña, the Pinta and the Santa Maria, right? Well, that's not even entirely accurate: the Santa Clara was nicknamed Niña ("Girl") because her owner was named Juan Nino of Moguer.
A lot of the mythology comes from Washington Irving, who, in 1828, wrote "A History of the Life and Voyages of Christopher Columbus, which actual scholars have called "fanciful and sentimental." (Really? The guy who wrote "The Legend of Sleepy Hollow" and "Rip Van Winkle" might have an active imagination?)
Columbus never set foot in North America: after his first voyage (he had four), he was named Viceroy and Governor of the Indies (which as far as he was concerned, was mostly Hispaniola), and he poked around in the adjoining islands, which included Cuba; his third voyage touched down briefly on the north-east corner of South America, and on his fourth voyage, he actually explored part of the Central American coast.
But he wasn't a particularly good or moral man. He tortured, killed and enslaved the local people; when the native Taino people of Hispaniola revolted at their treatment and killed the men left there as a colony from the first expedition, Columbus demanded a quarterly tribute in gold and cotton. Anyone over the age of 14 who didn't deliver had their hands cut off and was left to bleed to death.
He and his men frequently kidnapped and raped the native women. One of Columbus' childhood friends, Michele da Cuneo, wrote about one such incident this way:
While I was in the boat, I captured a very beautiful Carib woman, whom the said Lord Admiral gave to me. When I had taken her to my cabin she was naked - as was their custom. I was filled with a desire to take my pleasure with her and attempted to satisfy my desire. She was unwilling, and so treated me with her nails that I wished I had never begun. But - to cut a long story short - I then took a piece of rope and whipped her soundly, and she let forth such incredible screams that you would not have believed your ears. Eventually we came to such terms, I assure you, that you would have thought that she had been brought up in a school for whores.After his third voyage, some of his sailors revolted, claiming he'd lied to them about the wealth they'd be able to find in the New World (which, by the way, Columbus was still saying was the Orient); that, plus continued reports of his treatment of the natives, caused the Spanish Crown to order his arrest and return to Spain.
He only spent six weeks in prison before the crown ordered his release; after all, he'd paid back his debt, and more, in gold and slaves. He was allowed to make one more expedition, with the Santa Maria and three smaller ships. All four were destroyed, and Columbus and his men were stranded on Jamaica for a year before they were rescued. (The new governor on Hispaniola hated Columbus, and refused to allow any of his ships to rescue them.)
He returned to Spain, where he lived out his last two years of life. He tried to get the Spanish Crown to pay him 10% of all profits from the New World, as they'd agreed before his first voyage, but since he'd been relieved of his duties as governor, Spain didn't feel they needed to pay him. (The lawsuits filed by his heirs because of this lasted through the end of the 18th century.)
So Columbus opened the Americas to European settlement, and made Spain the preeminent power in the area for many years; he also managed to bring one other thing back, along with gold and slaves: he introduced syphilis to Europe. The initial outbreak is thought to have killed more than five million Europeans.
Well, after Mitt takes the oath of office, Native American populations will be able to take solace when the school textbooks are changed to reconcile with the "Book of Mormon" which clearly documents that America was populated by the Lost Tribes of Israel who arrived here by boat around 600 BC. Hello Lamanites - Goodbye Columbus!
ReplyDeleteI would much rather honor the memory of the most intrepid explorer in US History, Hiram Lowell McStuff who, back in 1923 discovered the hole in the doughnut. Unfortunately it did not lead to a secret Northwest Passage but only to the first Starbucks on the shores of Puget Sound.
ReplyDeleteAnd don't you wonder how people can be so sure about something totally contradicted by a huge and growing body of contrary evidence -- and still pretend to have a simple solution to our complex problems, most of which were created by doing what that solution contains?
ReplyDeleteAaargh
Nah, I don't like the "exploration" thing either, unless you want to call viking raids on Europe "Exploration" Exploitation would be more accurate.
Starbucks. One of the few things that irritates me more than Republican economics. Imagine a country that gets irate when they hear anyone speaking Spanish, but has to start speaking in tongues to pretend they're ordering a cup of coffee in some pretend European country. At least at Dunkin' Donuts you can say "coffee" without some teen age dweeb asking if you want an "Americano" or a simploduploventigrande flappalappadingdong.
ReplyDeleteHere in Boston's North End, the Italian community collected money to erect a monumentino to Cristoforo Columbo in the park that is named for him. I use the term "monumentino" because the statue of Cristorforo is quite small, and I've always wondered why the local Italians, so proud of their putative countryman [no one really knows for sure where he was actually from), settled for such a puny statue of a supposed giant of a seaman.
ReplyDeleteThe first year I moved here, October of 2004, I took an early morning walk in the park and to my astonishment beheld a beheaded Cristoforo Columbo statue--vandals had attacked it in the dead of night. The head mercifully had been found in the greenery and saved, but there, for weeks, stood the headless Cristoforo monumentino in all its gory, with a blue plastic garbage bag taped on his hapless stump of a neck.
Eventually the head was reattached.
"Chè per vendetta mai non sanò piaga"
Indeed, his Italian nationality may have been a false identity and I think the evidence for being from Genoa is shaky. He may have been of Jewish ancestry too, but who knows?
ReplyDeleteBut to me, the mythology hides the true nature of European contempt for non-Christians -- a murderous contempt. The story of Hatuey has been an inspiration to me.
The controversy over his birthplace is pretty well settled. The Portugese claim is mostly based around the fact that he named the isle of Cuba after a region of Portugal. The Spanish claimed he was a Spanish Jew for some time, based on some fairly flimsy evidence, too.
ReplyDeleteMy favorite, based (as far as I can tell) on no evidence whatsoever, was from the 60s Black Power movement, and claimed he was a Moor; the guy I heard trying to explain it hinted that he'd been diddling the queen, which was why she financed the voyage.
People are crazy.
Read an interesting book last year, 1493, by Charles Mann. He focuses on the Columbian Exchange, the biological changes that came about as a result of Columbus' accidental arrival on the shores of America. He also addresses the sociological implications. It's fascinating reading and debunks the childhood history lesson that is reduced to, "Columbus discovered America in 1492."
ReplyDeleteFlimsy perhaps but it's enjoyed a strong resurgence of late. C was a strange man fond of cryptic messages. I think the Genoa evidence is quite flimsy and born of Italian desires. The article you link to is almost a century old.
ReplyDeleteThe name Colon or Colomb means dove and in the iconography of the period, that meant the Holy Spirit. Even today, names like Espirito Santo are considered 'Jewish names' in Portugal even after a thousand years of being Christian, one is still a Converso. Conversos, Marranos or pigs as the Spanish called them seem to have taken such Holy Spirit names in many languages. Columbus also signed his name with a cryptogram like those used on Jewish tombstones in the area and instructed his heirs to use it in perpetuity. But it's speculation and we may never know for sure. I'm not sure it matters.
He didn't speak Italian and linguistic analysis of his surviving letters done a few years back is said to suggest he was a native Catalan speaker, hiding that origin and perhaps posing as Italian because the royal court had some serious problems with Catalonia. CNN gave a lot of attention to all this last Spring. If he wasn't of some Jewish background -- large numbers of Iberians were, since the Muslims had been somewhat tolerant and Al Andalus was a major Jewish center before the Reconquista -- he may yet have had some sympathies and certainly Jews (and muslims) in the 1480's and afterwards were desperate for a new and less murderously Christian destination. I believe there were wealthy Jewish investors too. In a time when using a compass or even Arabic numerals for navigation and calculation could get you burned alive, perhaps he had some non-Christians aboard, but that's speculation too.
But who cares? I agree, the Spanish and Portuguese invasion of the New World was an ugly and vicious thing and with nasty consequences the Europeans didn't forsee -- a ruthless quest for wealth at the expense of the lives of millions of people and involving theft, torture, slaughter, slavery and subjugation. It speaks to the state and nature of Western European Christianity and it's political institutions in the late 15th and early 16th century. Things weren't so good for non-Christians back home in Europe either and we only got a rather grudging apology after 14 hundred years of sweeping it under the rug.
It also gave birth to millions of Africans being sold into slavery after the indigenous Caribbean people were exterminated under horrifying circumstances. To me, it's one of the great horrors of human history.
Mann's book is a good, unbiased look at that history, although I can't imagine a world without all the dietary changes we've enjoyed at the expense of the millions of native peoples: Chocolate, Vanilla, Corn, Tomatoes Chile Peppers and Potatoes alone have changed life and waistlines.
"There's also the theory that Chinese Admiral Zheng He discovered America in 1421, but that's been mostly debunked."
ReplyDeleteMaybe, but look at the map - it's just an nice sail up the coast and a few miles of Bering Strait and shazam!, America.
Surely someone must have gone that route?
When you look at the ancient migration to the Australasian countries by people in just canoes or rafts, compared with the seafaring skills that East Asians have had in more recent history... It's got to be hasn't it?
Karl Bushby and Dmitri Pfeiffer even showed that you can swim across the Bering strait.
I don't know if the 1421 thing is true or not, but the Eskimos certainly showed up in their kayaks thousands of years ago and they're really from the same area. It's not as hard as it seems and all you had to do was follow the coast living off the sea life, as they did.
ReplyDeleteThere's even some tempting speculation that Europeans came across the Atlantic skirting the ice pack in the Neolithic.
And Europeans were present in East Asia perhaps much more than is now understood - there are 3,500 year old caucasian mummies from the Tarim basin. I don't see why Eurpeans couldn't have made it further across Asia and over to America.
ReplyDeleteIt's a big world, people have been around for a long time, it's hard to say who has been where.
For fun, here's how to cross the Bering Strait under your own power - no kayak needed!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zy2rOM7bdK8
ciao