Friday, January 17, 2014

Bloody revenge

"Oh, my God," said Amber McGuire as she watched her father die, strapped to a table like a sacrificial victim snorting and  gasping for air for almost 25 minutes. Dennis McGuire was guilty of  the rape and murder of a pregnant woman, there's no doubt about it.  The only doubts, and there are quite a few, is whether killing him was so urgent a matter to the State of Ohio that they had to use a new method, yet untried and without any particular regard to the chances of yet another, screwed up execution or should I say, state murder.

No pig or other animal was harmed in this experiment, only a human. Since the manufacturer of the three-drug killing machine drugs refuses to sell to executioners and Doctors refuse to administer far more humane injections, it's left to the kind of loathsome creeps that manage executions to choose how to kill people and besides, as Assistant Ohio Attorney General Thomas Madden said over the objection of McGuire's lawyers that while the U.S. Constitution bans cruel and unusual punishment, "you're not entitled to a pain-free execution." Not any more than you're entitled to humane imprisonment, entitled to be protected against unwarranted search and seizure or due process these days. And apparently we like it that way. We won't give it up. We won't stop finding lame excuses for doing it.  Unusual?  Sad to say, no. Cruel?  Well not if you're angry enough 

I have no idea whether the electric chair produces severe pain.  I suspect that in some cases it does and of course it's so gruesome to observers that the very first time it was tried, the witnesses fled the scene sobbing and vomiting, but that was then. This is now.  We are a far more hard hearted country, or at least the negative pole of our polarized country is. Read any news report that allows public commentary, watch Anderson Cooper with the viewer comments crawl and you skin may begin to crawl at the bloodthirsty rage of Americans.  It's as though we were still the land of barbaric public executions cheered on by the drooling bloodthirsty multitudes.  America treasures it's rage.  I'm sick at listening to people so in love with killing that any chance for doing it legally is a necrodesiac. They want death, they want it NOW and they want it as gruesome as those effeminate, whining, WWJD bleeding heart liberals will let it be.   Mad dogs are treated with far more compassion that mad humans in Ohio. A simple injection and the dog drifts painlessly away. 

So when the family of McGuire's victim says they have forgiven them but he still has to pay, I once again have to give up on Homo Americanus. Payment after all is not punishment. the offended party is not reimbursed nor made whole and the dead remain dead no matter what you do to the man, strapped helplessly to a cross, arms spread wide for the nasty accomplices to pump him full of agony.  While America smiles at the divine bookkeeping entry.  One family feels better, another has to live with having sat by and watched the state of Ohio kill her father. Surely that makes God smile in approval, seeing his books balanced.

Only a few countries execute people.  We're taught to see those countries as barbaric tyrannies.  Statistics don't show any preventative value, we do it because we can and because it's a chance to indulge our blood lust without guilt and so may of those who try to tell us this is a Christian Nation are firm supporters of killing people in cold blood.

I've never been closer to simply getting on a boat and sailing away

10 comments:

  1. As we watch the execution of a murderer, what we can take away from such a gruesome punishment is that the state tells us that killing people is wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 8x10 cell, bread and water, protein shake, some veggies and fruit, no windows, co phone, no TV, no human contact, no rope, no belt, Just a mattress, sink, and toilet. Until death do you part.

    Much more humane. And just.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Life in prison isn't much of a life. It's horrifying, in fact.

      Delete
  3. A key reason why capital punishment is stupid, I think, is that it is simply incompatible with due process. Many of us understand the idea of "cutting someone down in the midst of his evil acts," but of course that isn't at all what happens when the state sets about to put a killer to death. It generally takes years and includes (if memory serves) mandatory appeals and so forth. By the time it all finishes, you end up lethally injecting some guy in 2014 for something he did in 1982. And it hardly seems just or even minimally humane to do it that way, to allow such a gap between the evil a person does and the day of reckoning for it. For some people identity may be relatively stable, but in a couple of decades even very bad people sometimes change, and you may end up putting a "someone" to death who now bears little or no resemblance to the vicious criminal or drug-addled loser who committed the act so long ago. I'm just suggesting that thanks to our need to grant due process, we couldn't carry out such a drastic penalty in anything like the time frame that might make it seem "right."

    ReplyDelete
  4. I've often wondered what it is that attaches to the criminal upon committing a crime and whether it deteriorates or changes along with the person it attaches to. Does it have substance? Can it be removed? What attaches to us when we execute someone? Indeed, hanging an old man for what a young man once did seems to pose all kinds of questions. More questions than I can list or want to think about.

    I do know that there is no evidence that killing people deters murder and a large amount that it does not, but I think the deterrent argument is only an excuse. We have an instinct for revenge. We have an instinct for revenge and I suspect we get a charge out of working ourselves into one and a bigger one carrying it out, watching someone else carry it out or simply thinking about it -- in that order.

    Indeed I read a psychological study showing that had subjects watching videos of "bad guys" being punished and MRIs showed pleasure centers lighting up. No surprise there. Not hard to understand, but like all human instincts and proclivities, we wallow in them, just to get that 'kick.' We gloat over the pain and suffering of others easily when we have an excuse not to feel guilty and I'll bet Nero didn't have to advertise much to get people to pack the coliseum.

    The folks who wrote the bit about cruel punishment in the constitution were humanists and recalled things back in England like drawing and quartering and disembowelment. Many Americans would have enjoyed such things, would have brought lunch and the wife and kids to watch the slow hangings at the Tyburn Gallows. In many ways, that secular humanist, enlightenment movement that produced the USA was in vain.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "In many ways, that secular humanist, enlightenment movement that produced the USA was in vain." I agree, Captain,

      Delete
  5. This is interesting to read:

    "One day after a controversial lethal injection case in Ohio put the death penalty in crosshairs, another set of state lawmakers have proposed legislation that would allow execution by firing squad.

    The St. Louis Post Dispatch reported Friday that Missouri's HB 1470 puts that option on the table. State Rep. Paul Fitzwater (R-Potosi) told the paper that he cosponsored the legislation with the victims in mind.

    “People look at inmates who will be executed as victims,” Fitzwater said. “But the real victims have no voice because they are gone.”

    The Missouri bill arrives alongside that Ohio execution, which saw Dennis McGuire suffer through a 26-minute infusion of chemicals into his body. According to the AP, that was the longest of 53 executions in Ohio since the state reinstated capital punishment in 1999."

    ReplyDelete
  6. Capt. Fogg,

    Yes, I think it's all about revenge, not deterrence, and it answers to a very deep, even instinctual, propensity for violence in humans. I never bought the deterrence meme for one minute -- it's utter bullpucky because someone who commits such an extreme crime as murder is often either a conscienceless psychopath, a florid psychotic, or an ordinarily sane person somehow driven into or worked into a state of rage -- such people don't sit around thinking about consequences.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Then there is the somewhat understandable argument that when you take another life except in the act of self defense you forfeit your right to your on miserable life.

    Just sayin...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can accept that taking a human life is a crime against humanity. What I cannot accept is that killing is any less of a crime against humanity when it's done by the state. Capital punishment has not been demonstrated in any empirical study to serve as a deterrent to murder. No victim has ever been resurrected upon the execution of his or her killer. As the Captain states, the motivating factor for capital punishment is a desire for societal revenge. Very few of us recognize the inherent irony in our gleeful satisfaction at the execution of a human being for the killing of a human being. Even the life of a killer has value and taking that life should not be an option for the state. Neither should prisons be inhumane dungeons of gloom and doom. Treat people like savages and they will behave like savages.

      At one time in this country, we actually thought of prisons as places for rehabilitation. Not all people who commit crimes are salvageable, but many are, even killers. But we abandoned the notion of rehabilitation and focused on prisons as places of punishment. The result is that most people who are released from prison have developed more anti-social behaviors than they possessed when they were initially incarcerated. Then we marvel at the recidivism rate for convicted criminals.

      We live in a world where killing is commonplace. We communicate such mixed messages about the value of human life. Law enforcement generally kills with impunity. Even if the victim is unarmed, the standard is to justify and excuse the behavior. In the neighboring town of Durham, NC, a 15 year old Hispanic male was shot while in police custody, He was in the back of a squad car, his hands handcuffed behind his back. According to the arresting officer, this boy managed to conceal a gun on his person that was missed in the pat down during his arrest and the boy used the hidden weapon to commit suicide, shooting himself in the head. Some of us have questioned exactly how he managed this feat with his hands handcuffed behind him but so far, the police investigation has found no evidence of wrongdoing on the part of the officer; however, they have arrested some of the protesters of the secrecy of the police investigation on charges that they threw rocks at police officers.

      We kill on the battlefield where it's a kill or be killed world.

      We kill someone for robbing our home using the castle doctrine as our defense. Suddenly human life is less sacred than protecting our collections of things.

      We don't so much value human life as we value our ability to remain in control. Capital executions are the ultimate manifestation of societal control.

      Delete

We welcome civil discourse from all people but express no obligation to allow contributors and readers to be trolled. Any comment that sinks to the level of bigotry, defamation, personal insults, off-topic rants, and profanity will be deleted without notice.