I ask because currently the same party is chastising him for not having gone into Syria thus allowing ISIS a breeding ground. We need those airstrikes -- why didn't he make those airstrikes? We need airstrikes, says John McCain, in his time-worn tradition of damning Obama if he does or if he doesn't. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) wants to commit ground troops. This is all
"due to our total inaction. And it's going to be one of the more shameful chapters in American history," says John McCain
Sen. Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire said the President's limited foreign policy is no longer acceptable. I have no idea whether that refers to the hundred airstrikes the Obama administration has unilaterally launched into Northern Iraq to help the hopelessly rickety and incompetent government Republicans bragged about setting up not long ago, but we can be assured of at least one thing: Republicans will damn him for doing it and damn him for not stepping in earlier back when they were trying to impeach him for it.
It is really so confusing. But at the same time helpful really. Actually it is making that agonizing choice of which party to support in the 2016 national election easy. At least for me.
ReplyDeleteSupport all alternayve party candidates on the ballot, whatever party they may be from. At the presidential slot it will be libertarian for me. I've had it with the major party BS and republicans are the indisputable party of the clowns at this point in history.
Who was it. . . Caligula who made his horse a senator? We could do worse!
Delete"Who was it. . . Caligula who made his horse a senator? We could do worse!"
DeleteThus began the time-honored tradition of having horsesh*t come out of the Senate.
After a proper period of filly-bustering, that is.
Delete