"Thank you,
President Falwell and David. Thank you very much for inviting my wife, Jane,
and me to be with you even this morning. We appreciate the invitation very
much.
And let me
start off by acknowledging what I think all of you already know. And that is
the views that many here at Liberty University have and I, on a number of
important issues, are very, very different. I believe in a woman's rights....
And the
right of a woman to control her own body.
I believe
gay rights and gay marriage.
Those are
my views, and it is no secret. But I came here today, because I believe from the bottom of my heart that it is
vitally important for those of us who hold different views to be able to engage
in a civil discourse.
Too often
in our country -- and I think both sides bear responsibility for us -- there is
too much shouting at each other. There
is too much making fun of each other.
Now, in my
view, and I say this as somebody whose voice is hoarse, because I have given
dozens of speeches in the last few months, it is easy to go out and talk to
people who agree with you. I was in Greensboro, North Carolina, just last
night. All right. We had 9,000 people
out. Mostly they agreed with me. Tonight, we're
going to be in Manassas, and have thousands out and they agree with me. That's
not hard to do. That's what politicians by and large do.
We go out
and we talk to people who agree with us.
But it is harder, but
not less important, for us to try and communicate with those who do not agree
with us on every issue.
And it is important to
see where if possible, and I do believe it is possible, we can find common
ground.
Now,
Liberty University is a religious school, obviously.
And all of
you are proud of that.
You are a
school which, as all of us in our own way, tries to understand the meaning of
morality. What does is mean to live a moral life? And you try to understand, in
this very complicated modern world that we live in, what the words of the Bible
mean in today's society.
You are a
school which tries to teach its students how to behave with decency and with
honesty and how you can best relate to your fellow human beings, and I applaud
you for trying to achieve those goals.
Let me
take a moment, or a few moments, to tell you what motivates me in the work that
I do as a public servant, as a senator from the state of Vermont. And let me
tell you that it goes without saying, I am far, far from being a perfect human
being, but I am motivated by a vision, which exists in all of the great
religions, in Christianity, in Judaism, in Islam and Buddhism, and other
religions.
And that
vision is so beautifully and clearly stated in Matthew 7:12, and it states, "So in everything, do to others what you would
have them to do to you, for this sums up the war and the prophets." That is the golden rule. Do unto others, what you would
have them do to you. That is the golden rule, and it is not very complicated.
Let me be
frank, as I said a moment ago. I understand that the issues of abortion and gay
marriage are issues that you feel very strongly about. We disagree on those
issues. I get that, but let me respectfully suggest that there are other issues
out there that are of enormous consequence to our country and in fact to the
entire world, that maybe, just maybe, we do not disagree on and maybe, just
maybe, we can try to work together to resolve them.
Amos 5:24,
"But let justice roll on like a river, righteousness like a never-failing
stream." Justice treating others the way we want to be treated, treating
all people, no matter their race, their color, their stature in life, with
respect and with dignity.
Now here
is my point. Some of you may agree with me, and some of you may not, but in my
view, it would be hard for anyone in this room today to make the case that the
United States of America, our great country, a country which all of us love, it would be hard to make the case that we are a
just society, or anything resembling a just society today.
In the
United States of America today, there is massive injustice in terms of income
and wealth inequality. Injustice is rampant. We live, and I hope all of you
know this, in the wealthiest country
in the history of the world.
But most
Americans don't know that. Because almost all of that wealth and income is
going to the top 1 percent.
You know,
that is the truth. We are living in a time -- and I warn all of you if you
would, put this in the context of the Bible, not me, in the context of the
Bible -- we are living in a time where a handful of people have wealth beyond
comprehension. And I'm talking about tens of billions of dollars, enough to
support their families for thousands of years. With huge yachts, and jet planes and tens of billions. More money than
they would ever know what to do with.
But at
that very same moment, there are millions of people in our country, let alone
the rest of the world, who are struggling to feed their families. They are
struggling to put a roof over their heads, and some of them are sleeping out on
the streets. They are struggling to find money in order to go to a doctor when
they are sick.
Now, when
we talk about morality, and when we talk about justice, we have to, in my view,
understand that there is no justice when so few have so much and so many have
so little.
There is
no justice, and I want you to hear this clearly, when the top one-tenth of 1 percent -- not 1 percent, the top
one-tenth of 1 percent -- today in America owns almost as much wealth as the
bottom 90 percent. And in your hearts, you will
have to determine the morality of that, and the justice of that.
In my
view, there is no justice, when here, in Virginia and Vermont and all over this
country, millions of people are working long hours for abysmally low wages of $7.25 an hour, of $8 an
hour, of $9 an hour, working hard, but unable to
bring in enough money to adequately feed their kids.
And yet,
at that same time, 58 percent of all
new income generated is going to the top 1 percent.
You have got to think about the morality of that, the justice of that, and
whether or not that is what we want to see in our country.
In my
view, there is no justice when, in recent years, we have seen a proliferation
of millionaires and billionaires, while at the same time the United States of
America has the highest rate of childhood poverty of any major country on
Earth. How can we? I want you to go into your hearts, how can we talk about
morality, about justice, when we turn our backs on the children of our country?
Now you
have got to think about it. You have to think about it and you have to feel it
in your guts. Are you content? Do you
think it's moral when 20 percent of the children in this country, the
wealthiest country in the history of the world, are living in poverty? Do you think it is acceptable that 40 percent of
African American children are living in poverty?
In my
view, there is no justice, and morality suffers when in our wealthy country,
millions of children go to bed hungry. That is not morality and that is not in
my view ... what America should be about.
In my
view, there is no justice when the 15 wealthiest people in this country in the
last two years -- two years -- saw their wealth increase by $170 billion. Two
years. The wealthiest 15 people in
this country saw their wealth increase by $170 billion.
My friends, that is more wealth acquired in a two-year period
than is owned by the bottom 130 million Americans. And while the very,
very rich become much richer, millions of families have no savings at all.
Nothing in the bank. And they worry every single day that if their car breaks
down, they cannot get to work, and if they cannot get to work, they lose their
jobs.
And if
they lose their jobs, they do not feed their family. In the last two years, 15
people saw $170 billion increase in their wealth, 45 million Americans live in
poverty. That in my view is not justice. That
is a rigged economy, designed by the wealthiest people in this country to
benefit the wealthiest people in this country at the expense of everybody else.
In my
view, there is no justice when thousands of Americans die every single year
because they do not have any health insurance and do not go to a doctor when
they should. I have talked personally to doctors throughout Vermont and
physicians around the country. And without exception, they tell me there are
times when patients walk into their office very, very sick and they say, why
didn't you come in here when you're sick? And the answer is, I do not have any
health insurance or I have a high deductible or I thought the problem would get
better. And sometimes it doesn't, and sometimes they die because they lack
health insurance.
That is
not justice. That is not morality. People should not be dying in the United
States of America when they are sick.
What that
is, is an indication that we are the only major country on earth that does not
guarantee health care to all people as a right, and I think we should change
that.
And I
think -- I think that when we talk about morality, what we are talking about is
all of God's children. The poor, the wretched, they have a right to go to a
doctor when they are sick.
You know,
there is a lot of talk in this country from politicians about family values.
You have all heard that. Well, let me tell you about a family value.
In my view, there is no
justice when low income and working class mothers are forced to separate from
their babies one or two weeks after birth and go back to work because they need
the money that their jobs provide. Now I know everybody here -- we all are,
maybe in different ways, but all of us believe in family values.
Jane and I
have four kids. We have seven beautiful grandchildren. We believe in family
values. But it is not a family value when all of you know that the most
important moments and time of a human being's life is the first weeks and
months after that baby is born. That is the moment when mothers bonds with the
baby; gets to love and know her baby -- dad is there as well. That is what a
family is about. And those of you -- at least those of you who are parents --
more parents back here than there I suspect. You know what an unforgettable
moment that is. What an important moment that is. And I want you to think,
whether you believe it is a family value, that the United States of America is the only -- only -- major
country on earth that does not provide paid family and medical leave.
Now in
English, what that means is that all over the world when a woman has her baby
she is guaranteed the right because society understands how important that
moment is. She is guaranteed the right to stay home and get income in order to
nurture her baby. And that is why I believe when we talk about family values
that the United States government must provide at least 12 weeks of paid family
and medical leave.
In my view
there is no justice in our country when youth unemployment exists at tragically
high levels. I requested a study last month from a group of economists. And
what they told me is that 51 percent
of African American high school graduates between the ages of 17 and 20 are
unemployed or underemployed -- 51 percent.
We have in
this country sufficient amounts of money to put more people in jail than any
other country on earth. The United
States has more people in jail than China; a communist authoritarian country.
But
apparently we do not have enough money to provide jobs and education to our
young people. I believe that's wrong.
I am not a theologian, I am not an expert
on the Bible, nor am I a Catholic. I am just a United States senator from the
small state of Vermont. But I agree with Pope
Francis, who will soon be coming to visit us in the United States.
I agree
with Pope Francis when he says, and I quote, "The current financial crisis
originated in a profound human crisis, the denial of the primacy of the human
person," and this is what he writes: "We have created new idols. The
worship of the ancient golden calf has returned in a new and ruthless guise in
the idolatry of money and the dictatorship of an impersonal economy lacking a
truly human purpose," end of quote.
And the
pope also writes, quote, "There is a need for financial reform along
ethical lines that would produce in its turn an economic reform to benefit
everyone. Money has to serve, not to rule," end of quote.
Now those
are pretty profound words, which I hope we will all think about. In the pope's
view, and I agree with him, we are living in a nation and in a world, and the
Bible speaks to this issue, in a nation and in a world which worships not love
of brothers and sisters, not love of the poor and the sick, but worships the acquisition of money and great wealth. I do not believe that is the country we should be
living in.
Money and
wealth should serve the people. The people should not have to serve money and
wealth. (APPLAUSE)
Throughout
human history, there has been endless discussion. It is part of who we are as
human beings, people who think and ask questions, endless discussion and debate
about the meaning of justice and about the meaning of morality. And I know that
here at Liberty University, those are the kinds of discussions you have every
day, and those are the kinds of discussions you should be having and the kinds
of discussions we should be having all over America.
I would
hope, and I conclude with this thought, I would hope very much that as part of
that discussion and part of that learning process, some of you will conclude
that if we are honest in striving to be a moral and just society, it is
imperative that we have the courage to stand with the poor, to stand with
working people and when necessary, take on very powerful and wealthy people
whose greed, in my view, is doing this country enormous harm.
Thank
you all very much."
Did you transcribe that entire speech? A very valuable public service. It shows that it means a lot to you. Of course, there is a fairly big blunder in one of the bible quotes. But nevertheless, I thank you and salute you.
ReplyDeleteI imagine that the speech was extremely well-received. It has a genius of simplicity. It is a very natural idea to take the principles of the bible and use them as a measuring stick by which to judge our society. It seems to me that our own Fogg likes to take biblical teachings and juxtapose them against the failures and cognitive dissonance of the hypocritical religious right. And I'm quite sure that these young people understand exactly what it was that Bernie had to say. Funny thing is, a lot of republicans, particularly those who are serious about an actual faith in God are somehow able to espouse the message of the gospel or the words of the prophets and still see the election of republican politicians as the logical route to a holy and just nation. Something to do with doublespeak I guess. We have all heard contemporary republican politicians speaking about the stagnation of wages or the disappearance of the American middle class as if they had all they answers.
Of course, the real question is, beyond whatever controversy and excitement that his appearance may briefly stir on this campus, how many of these young people will have a change of heart to the point of supporting Sanders? How many others that hear him will come around to offer their support? Is his appeal broad and strong enough to reach peoples' better selves and common sense on the scale that is necessary to become elected? It's probably got to be now or never for him, much as it was for Hillary eight years ago. These moments only come once in a lifetime for most politicians. (Nixon being the notable exception!)
It is certainly refreshing. If he is elected president, he may someday request an audience with our awesome hippie pope! Free the people, baby.
Moral Politics is the title of book by George Lakoff, a linguistics professor at Berkeley, who has admonished fellow liberals for allowing religious rightwing hacks to hijack public policy debates. Perhaps Bernie Sanders read this book and is trying to redress an imbalance by calling attention to inequality and injustice in contemporary America.
DeleteI am also thinking of an influential essay, ”The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America is Tearing Us Apart,” by Bill Bishop, who reminds us of our natural tendency to self-segregate along partisan and religious lines. When people holding opposite viewpoints stop talking to each other, the result, he says, is mutual incomprehension and animosity. Even worse, self-segregated people tend to adopt more extreme and intractable viewpoints.
Does this speech at Liberty University represent an opening? Will Bernie Sanders’ speech help break down these divisions? Maybe. Maybe not. Why I remain skeptical:
The moral hypocrisy of certain religious rightwing factions is striking. On the one hand, they espouse Christian values yet embrace public policies that contradict those values.
They embrace a primitive worldview (pre “Book of Job”) that equates material wealth with godliness.
Their economic and fiscal policies reward privilege but not work. They disdain the working poor and regard them as “morally inferior” to the rich and powerful.
They claim to love God and all Creation, yet they deny climate science and the responsible stewardship of Earth resources.
They claim to value “life” but do not support educational, healthcare, or social safety net initiatives that can improve the quality of life of families and children.
There are authoritarian social-controllers among them whose sense of “freedom” versus “oppression” is inverted and self-serving, who would criminalize the most natural and private aspects of our lives and turn all concepts of “religious freedom” into a de facto theocracy. On matters of personal conscience, these are not your Golden Rule or “live-and-let-live” kind of people.
So it remains to be seen where any of this goes.
You don't need a weatherman to see which way the wind blows,
Deletenor need you be a prophet to guess which way this story goes.
You need only observe human behavior in the long term and in the long term, the victor takes the spoils and the war never ends. Religion is a tool for the powerful regardless of any original cause or meaning. The belief in Jesus of Nazareth served Jewish rebels and one has to be fairly ignorant not to notice the facility with which the target of those rebels bought it and the Bishops sold it for power and safety and the founders of the religion became the persecuted of the religion.
We are not guaranteed freedom of religion, only freedom from any religion being made official and this is precisely what the Evangelicals are seeking -- the right to their own judiciary, their own country. That this makes the idea of an Almighty a bit risible escapes these dysfunctional minds. They seek tyranny and nothing less, hence their mouths are full of talk about freedom and every word a treasonous insult to the promised equality and the right to live on'e life as one will that is our birthright as citizens of a secular Republic.
How can we reconcile the basis of law being the will of the governed with the basis being the words of men and women who say they talk for some God they invent for the purpose? That's not to say there is no God, but that our only source for his word is some text written by human hands -- some crazy quilt of ancient myth; gods sewn together from other gods and the political rants of long forgotten context.
All indeed is vanity. So I don't look for anything from Christianity either, even if it's possible that Christians can act rationally and respect their own inability to be certain and honest at the same time. There aren't enough of such, reason and God being antithetical.
I don't have much hope for Bernie either. I think he would do for the Democrats what Walter Mondale did for them. His arguments may be impeccable and compelling but he's arguing with people who roll babbling on the floor before idols and see existence in the same fashion as Gilgamesh did. I see religion as the failure of Humanity, not the salvation and if those students were likely to accept what he's saying, they probably wouldn't be there to listen.