Friday, November 20, 2015

Aux Etats Sunni


(Note: This article was originally posted on August 31, 2014 - almost a year and half ago.  Please note the play on words:  Aux Etats Uni is French for the “United States;”  Aux Etats Sunni is a reference to “Sunni States” — almost an acronym for ISIS.  Both are pronounced exactly the same.)
By (O)CT(O)PUS

Let us recall this quote from the film classic, Lawrence of Arabia:


So long as the Arabs fight tribe against tribe, so long will they be 
a little people, a silly people - greedy, barbarous, and cruel …

Arabs or Americans?  Sometimes I wonder which of the two are the little people, the silly people. If anything, Americans are a meddlesome people - provincial, opinionated, and arrogant; yet exceptionally ignorant of Middle Eastern culture and history.

How many Americans recall the coup that overthrew Mohammed Moseddegh, the first democratically elected leader of Iran?  In 1953, our own CIA aided and abetted the British in toppling a nascent democracy over access to Persian oil. “A cruel and imperialistic country” stealing from a “needy and naked people” were the words spoken by Mosaddegh at the International Court of Justice in the Hague. These words have informed Middle Eastern attitudes for more than half a century.

Does terrorism represent the face of Islam? Not according to the highest religious authority of Saudi Arabia, who said: “Extremist and militant ideas and terrorism which spread decay on Earth, destroying human civilisation, are not in any way part of Islam, but are enemy number one of Islam, and Muslims are their first victims” (The Grand Mufti Sheik Abdulaziz Al al-Sheik).

Not according to the highest religious authority of Egypt, who said: “An extremist and bloody group such as this poses a danger to Islam and Muslims, tarnishing its image as well as shedding blood and spreading corruption” (The Grand Mufti Shawqi Allam).

Not according to the Egyptian military, which overthrew the government of Mohamed Morsi and bans the fundamentalist Muslim Brotherhood. Nor the monarchy of Saudi Arabia, which banished al-Qaeda, whose affiliated groups now operate in remote regions of Yemen and North Africa. Yet, how many Americans pay attention?

Consider the impact of successive Western interventions in the Middle East over time starting with European colonialism.  Shall we forget vainglorious wars over spheres of power and influence -- and access to Middle Eastern oil.  As colonial empires crumbled in the aftermath of WWI, European powers gave little thought to the historical schism between the Shiite and Sunni branches of Islam.  Britain drew borders around rival ethnic enclaves and formed artificial nation states - thus creating a recipe for future volatility.

Failing to take these historical antecedents into account, America blundered into an occupation of Iraq that worsened an already unstable situation. In short order, the American regency of Paul Bremer swept away a long established order. Regime change brought in a new Shiite government that promptly disenfranchised and persecuted the Sunnis. Thus began a cycle of sectarian conflict and civil war – rife with insurgencies, ethnic militias, car bombings, kidnappings, massacres, and more. The American misadventure triggered a chain reaction leading directly to the rise of ISIS.

A headline de jour fails to capture the broader perspectives of history. What our news media never told us: Every bungled misadventure by a Western power has upset the fragile status quo and upped the ante on radicalism and savagery.


We broke it. Now our loyal opposition party exhort us to fix it. How ironic!  Ethnic and religious divisions of the Middle East mirror our partisan divisions at home, as the current state of the debate in Washington demonstrates:
A war-weary American public says: “No more boots on the ground.”  Neo-conservatives in Congress demand military action. 
Iraqi President al-Maliki oppresses the Sunnis and creates a window of opportunity for ISIS. Republicans blame the crisis on the president. 
Al-Malady refuses to sign a Residual Force Agreement; Republicans blame the president. 
Our military says ISIS cannot be defeated without a Syrian incursion. Last year, a GOP dominated Congress failed to reach a military authorization agreement.
Follow the trail of duplicity amongst our allies in the region: ISIS trades Syrian oil for money and arms with our NATO ally, Turkey.  Our military maintains vital strategic strike capabilities at al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, Ali al Salem Air Base in Kuwait, and al Dhafra Air Base in the United Arab Emirates.  Yet, the wealthy citizens of Qatar, Kuwait, and the UAE underwrite radical jihadi groups throughout the Middle East -- from al-Qaeda to ISIS.

How can the enemy of your enemy be your friend when you can no longer distinguish enemies from friends?

Meanwhile, partisans in Congress criticize the President over an honest admission: “We don't have a strategy yet” for dealing with the 'existential threat' of ISIS.  Perhaps the time is long overdue to rethink the complexities, duplicities and past failures -- to avoid another national repetition compulsion -- before we blunder yet again into another Middle Eastern abyss.

2 comments:

  1. In reply to this discussion thread at Shaw's place:

    Dave Miller: “The problem from the liberal side is this ... the left has done a horrible job of addressing these concerns … our President owes us an explanation (November 20, 2015 at 1:52 PM).“

    I agree with this assessment. It has been this President’s Achilles heal from the beginning. To assuage the inevitable fear mongering and backlash that follows tragedy and sell a counter intuitive argument when Americans demand retribution requires direct engagement of the public. For better or worse, former President Bush understood this; President Obama does not.

    Not just spin, but a truthful argument: The Paris incident was not the work of foreign born jihadis, but the work of homegrown malcontents with criminal records. It is also the product of a culture that is less successful at assimilating its immigrant populations.

    Not just spin, but a moral argument: The overwhelming majority of innocent victims are NOT Americans or Europeans, but Muslims — by ratios greater than a thousand to one. How can we regard ourselves as a moral people when we turn away refugees and compound the worst humanitarian crisis since WWII. Islamophobia and xenophobia are also forms of victim blame.

    Not just spin, but a strategic argument: ISIS feeds off the refugee crisis and exposes Western duplicity as a recruitment tool. There is a logic and purpose behind extreme brutality. ISIS is an Apocalyptic Cult that feeds off chaos and blood and banks on backlash — reactionary Islamophobia, victim blame, hypocrisy, and sheer stupidity. Why deliver to ISIS their own narrative on a silver platter?

    And why can’t the President just explain it in simple terms … LIVE on national television … to an American audience! The GOP wins when the President is MIA.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Explanation in simple terms is the opiate of the masses.

    ReplyDelete

We welcome civil discourse from all people but express no obligation to allow contributors and readers to be trolled. Any comment that sinks to the level of bigotry, defamation, personal insults, off-topic rants, and profanity will be deleted without notice.